Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04ANKARA2663
2004-05-12 08:01:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

NEW DRAFT LAW REMOVES BARRIER TO UNIVERSITY

Tags:  KPAO OEXC SCUL PHUM TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 002663 

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR R (U/S TUTWILER); ECA (A/S HARRISON, P/DAS
CROUCH); ECA/A/L (KERR); EUR/PPD, EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/11/2005
TAGS: KPAO OEXC SCUL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: NEW DRAFT LAW REMOVES BARRIER TO UNIVERSITY
ENTRANCE FOR GRADUATES OF IMAM HATIP SCHOOLS

REF: ANKARA 2600


(U) Classified by DCM Robert Deutsch. Reasons: 1.5 (b) and
(d)


C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 002663

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR R (U/S TUTWILER); ECA (A/S HARRISON, P/DAS
CROUCH); ECA/A/L (KERR); EUR/PPD, EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/11/2005
TAGS: KPAO OEXC SCUL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: NEW DRAFT LAW REMOVES BARRIER TO UNIVERSITY
ENTRANCE FOR GRADUATES OF IMAM HATIP SCHOOLS

REF: ANKARA 2600


(U) Classified by DCM Robert Deutsch. Reasons: 1.5 (b) and
(d)



1. (C) Summary: AK Party (AKP) government will press ahead
with its new draft higher education law despite open
opposition from the military and higher education
establishment. Under the existing law, higher education has
been under the purview of the controversial Higher Education
Council (YOK),set up by the military after the 1980 coup.
YOK has been autonomous from the government, i.e., the
Ministry of Education. Rather than overhauling the troubled
educational system, the draft law would transfer important
decisions formerly reserved for YOK to the government,
further reducing university autonomy. The most controversial
provision would equalize the university entrance exam
coefficient for graduates of the religious-oriented imam
hatip high schools who want to study in departments other
than theology, a change demanded by AKP's voter base. This
move is viewed by AKP as righting the discriminatory ranking
of entrance exam results but by the "secular" establishment
as an effort to turn the university system into a fifth
column for "fundamentalists". End Summary.


--------------
Highlights of New Draft Law
--------------



2. (U) The new law would transfer the authority from YOK to
universities to hire low-level staff and to the Inter
University Council (university rectors and one professor from
each university) for higher-level staff. If the draft law
passes, all 22 YOK members will be dismissed and replaced by
15 members selected by the President, government ministers,
and the Inter University Council of Rectors. A
constitutional amendment adopted by Parliament May 7 removed
the Turkish General Staff (TGS) representative from YOK.
Instead of being selected by the President, the chairman of
YOK will be elected by the 15 YOK members, ostensibly
bringing more democracy to the process. The law will also
establish ethics commissions in universities to punish
professors who plagiarize. It will bring more objective

criteria to hiring staff, shorten the waiting period between
assistant and associate professorships, and legalize student
organizations. The most controversial clause will level the
playing field for students of imam hatip schools wishing to
enter departments in universities other than theology.
Minister of Education Celik has announced that more
fundamental changes to the higher education law will have to
await a further constitutional amendment.


--------------
Background of Imam Hatip Schools
--------------



3. (U) The ostensible purpose of imam hatip schools (IHS),
which developed rapidly starting in the 1950's, is to train
future imams or IHS teachers. For this reason, IHS are
designated as vocational schools. They are attractive to
parents who want their children to receive a more formal and
extensive religious education than the general morals/history
of religion lessons that are compulsory under the rubric of
"religion education" in middle and high schools schools. In
1996, more than 511,000 students were enrolled in IHSes. In
a move designed to swing the balance more toward "secular"
education in the wake of the military's 1997 post-modern coup
against the Islamist government of then-PM Erbakan (who had
declared IHSes the Islamist movement's back yard),the
succeeding government made education in regular schools
compulsory until eighth grade, resulting in a drop to 193,000
IHS students in 1998. At the same time YOK effectively
barred university entrance to IHS graduates to departments
other than theology by dropping their university entrance
coefficient to 0.3 from the standard 0.8. A lack of
university opportunities for IHS graduates caused parents to
place their children elsewhere. IHS enrollment dropped by
40,000 students per year from almost 193,000 in 1998 to
92,000 in 2001, and finally to approximately 70,000 today.
PM Erdogan,s campaign promise to raise the lower coefficient
renewed hope that there is a future in Turkish universities
for IHS graduates, resulting in a rise of 20,000 in
applications to these schools.



4. (U) Under the present system, approximately 35% of
secondary students (900,000) study in technical schools and
65% in regular and Anatolian (elite) high schools. After
ninth grade, students in regular and Anatolian high schools
must choose among three broad categories of specialization:
math, verbal, or a combination of the two. University
departments are divided into the same broad categories. For
example, philosophy is considered a verbal subject,
engineering a math subject, and economics a combination of
the two. The high school graduation score is multiplied by
0.8 for all students, including technical students, who
continue university studies in their field of specialization.
However, the score is multiplied by 0.3 for students wishing
to enter departments outside of their secondary school
specialization.



5. (U) In practice, this means that graduates of IHSes have
their scores multiplied by 0.8 if they enter theology
departments but have their scores multiplied by 0.3 for all
other subjects, effectively barring them from studying
anything other than theology in the university. The new law
would widen the choices for IHS graduates by placing them in
the verbal category. A graduate of an IHS who wanted to
become an engineer would face the same penalty of the 0.3
coefficient, but one who wanted to study history at the
university would have his university entrance score
multiplied by 0.8 just like a graduate of a regular high
school in the verbal stream.


--------------
Revenge of February 28?
--------------



6. (U) The AKP government argues that these changes are
necessary not to save IHSes, but to save technical schools in
general. In public and private remarks, Minister of
Education Celik has argued that 65% of the population should
be in technical schools, not the inverse, as is the current
case. One high-ranking education official remarked to poloff
that the new rules are required to save technical schools.
It is true that IHSes cover most of the courses that regular
high schools do and make up the difference of added religious
content by requiring students to study an extra year. PM
Erdogan reminds interlocutors that he himself is a graduate
of an IHS.



7. (U) The new draft law is viewed by the "secular"
establishment as an attempt by the AKP government to reverse
the post-modern coup of February 28, 1997, which led to
Erbakan's ouster. In this context, the TGS issued a press
release asserting the draft law is a threat to "secularism".
In the secularists' view, opening up universities to IHS
graduates is thus a move to pack the universities with
religious-minded students and eventually fill government
positions with religious "fundamentalists". Forcing YOK
members to resign will allow the government to replace the
current board with a group more sympathetic to AKP,s aims,
they assert.



8. (U) Secularists go on to argue that there is no need for
IHSes, which produce 25,000 graduates annually when Turkey
needs only 5,000 new imams a year. Slightly less than
one-third of the students are female, and cannot become
imams. The draft law was put together hastily, the
secularists claim (the YOK debate has been going on for years
and the current government began to consider draft laws soon
after taking power at the end of 2002),with basically no
input from YOK, to be enacted before the June 20 university
entrance examinations.



9. (U) The real victims of the university entrance
examinations are not graduates of technical schools, whose
entrance rate in regular university courses is more than 7%,
the secularists, state, but graduates of regular high
schools, whose entrance rate is approximately 8%. In fact,
the secularists claim, the government,s argument that the
new law is necessary does not hold water since in contrast to
IHSes, the student population in other technical schools
increases every year.



10. (U) The present draft law continues the acrimonious
climate and mutual distrust between the AKP government and
Turkey,s academia. The government has already taken control
over scholarships from universities and frozen hiring of
research assistants. It was forced to retract a proposal to
dismiss all rectors and senior administrators under public
pressure. From the other side, YOK,s uncompromising stance
has exasperated even the Inter University Council, which
negotiated directly with the government, essentially leaving
YOK with no say in its future. On the other hand, most of
the teachers in IHSes are graduates of departments of
education and provide the same education as in regular
schools. Since students in IHSes perform poorly in university
examinations in any event, there is little likelihood of a
flood of IHS graduates into the universities.



11. (C) Comment: There is wide agreement on the need to
reform Turkey,s overly centralized higher education system,
though not on the details of how to do it. Unfortunately,
fundamental issues have been overshadowed by the debate over
coefficients. The head of the Parliament,s Education
Committee admitted to the press that the new bill is prepared
in reaction to pressure from the IHS base, despite claims by
the Minister of Education to the contrary. Unlike its stance
regarding entry into the EU or Cyprus, AK Party, in this
case, appears to be appealing to its base. Instead of
increasing budgetary, administrative and academic equality,
the bill largely leaves important decisions in the hands of
the government. All parties concerned -- YOK, the Inter
University Council, and the Ministry of Education -- have
been unable to compromise and produce a bill which addresses
the real problems of the education system. Minister Celik
has stated that fundamental reforms will have to wait for
constitutional changes. Meanwhile, the current poisoned
atmosphere bodes ill for real educational reform.


EDELMAN