Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04ANKARA1675
2004-03-19 15:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

GOT'S COUNTERPROPOSAL ON CFE INSPECTION PROCEDURES

Tags:  KCFE PARM PREL TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 001675 

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/19/2014
TAGS: KCFE PARM PREL TU
SUBJECT: GOT'S COUNTERPROPOSAL ON CFE INSPECTION PROCEDURES

REF: A) SECSTATE 6149 B) 03 ANKARA 6909


C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 001675

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/19/2014
TAGS: KCFE PARM PREL TU
SUBJECT: GOT'S COUNTERPROPOSAL ON CFE INSPECTION PROCEDURES

REF: A) SECSTATE 6149 B) 03 ANKARA 6909



1. (U) This is an action request. See para 4.



2. (U) On March 18, MFA Head of Department for Disarmament
Affairs, Bulent Meric delivered the GOT's counter proposal
for the CFE host country agreement proposal that was conveyed
to the Turks (ref. A). The body of the letter as follows.



3. (C) Begin text.


With regard to Washington's amendment proposals on the draft
Turkey-U.S. Bilateral Cooperation Agreement on CFE Treaty
Inspections, please find here below the comments of our
relevant authorities on the proposed amendments:


A) Comment 1: U.S. proposal to replace the phrase "for the
covered equipment and facilities" in various parts of the
text, with the phrase "of a site or specified area that
contains U.S. equipment or facilities" can unfortunately not
be acceptable.


Rationale: The phrase "for covered equipment and facilities"
is in fact originally a U.S. proposal which was later
accepted by Turkey.


The proposed new phrase does not fit in the main thrust of
the draft text. On the other hand, since there is only one
site (Incirlik/Adana) which contains U.S. equipment or
facilities, subject to CFE inspections, there is no need to
mention the site and type of inspections in the text.


Proposal: Turkey is in favor of maintaining the phrase "for
the covered equipment and facilities" in the text. If U.S.
has strong views in rephrasing, we propose to revert to the
original working in the text agreed upon ad referendum on 5
April 2001, which is "of conventional armaments and equipment
subject to the CFE Treaty belonging to the United States of
America, of equipment and materiel belonging to the United
States of America, and of structures or premises utilized by
the United States of America by agreement with the Republic
of Turkey present on the territory of the Republic of Turkey".


B) Comment 2: Turkey agrees on the second U.S. proposal to
replace the phrase "on the conventional armaments and
equipment limited by the CFE Treaty" with "on the
conventional armaments and equipment subject to the CFE
Treaty."


End of Text.



4. (U) Embassy would appreciate Washington's reaction as soon
as possible.
EDELMAN