Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
04ABUJA1284
2004-07-23 07:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Abuja
Cable title:  

ELECTION NULLIFICATION OVERTURNED, KEEPING

Tags:  KDEM PGOV PREL PHUM NI ELECTIONS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001284 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/22/2014
TAGS: KDEM PGOV PREL PHUM NI ELECTIONS
SUBJECT: ELECTION NULLIFICATION OVERTURNED, KEEPING
ADAMAWA'S GOVERNOR IN PLACE

REF: A. ABUJA 588

B. ABUJA 539

Classified By: ACTING POLITICAL COUNSELOR RUSSELL J. HANKS FOR REASONS
1.5 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001284

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/22/2014
TAGS: KDEM PGOV PREL PHUM NI ELECTIONS
SUBJECT: ELECTION NULLIFICATION OVERTURNED, KEEPING
ADAMAWA'S GOVERNOR IN PLACE

REF: A. ABUJA 588

B. ABUJA 539

Classified By: ACTING POLITICAL COUNSELOR RUSSELL J. HANKS FOR REASONS
1.5 (B) AND (D)


1. (U) Summary. On July 5, an appeals court sitting in Jos
overturned the March 24 election tribunal decision that had
nullified the election of Adamawa State Governor Boni Haruna.
The verdicts of the appeals court and the election tribunal
differed so significantly on their findings of the relevant
facts that they beg the question of whether one verdict or
the other may have been "influenced" by outside parties. End
summary.


2. (U) On July 5, an appeals court sitting in Jos overturned
the March 24 election tribunal decision (reftels A and B)
that had nullified the election of Adamawa State Governor
Boni Haruna, PDP member and protege of VP Atiku Abubakar.
The original election tribunal had found "beyond reasonable
doubt" that electoral malpractices had taken place, and that
the election was noncompliant with the Electoral Law.


3. (U) The appeals court in Jos, however, found that the
evidence used by the election tribunal was "absolutely
inadequate even to prove the simplest of a criminal offence,
very impotent to affect the appellants/cross respondents,
ridiculous for convicting any of the appellants/cross
respondents with commission of any electoral offence," and
that the evidence was scandalous and naive as a basis for
nullifying the election.


4. (C) According to an attorney for Haruna, the outcome was
ensured in typical Nigerian fashion: with cash. The
attorney, who works for Presidential attorney Afe Babalola,
said that when President Obasanjo sent Babalola to take over
the appeal, he also sent cash to be used for the appeal. The
attorney claims that he went along for the delivery of 30
million naira (about $225,000) to each of the five judges on
the tribunal but did not know if this was all the money
disbursed. "This is the normal procedure when it is an
important case," he averred.


5. (U) Note. The appeals court decision is final and cannot
be appealed to Nigeria's Supreme Court. End Note.


6. (SBU) Comment. While the Embassy has been unable to
examine the Appeal Court ruling in its entirety, the verdicts
of the appeals court and the election tribunal differed so
significantly on their findings of the relevant facts that it
begs the question of whether one verdict or the other may
have been "influenced" by outside parties. Both courts were
composed of senior members of the judiciary, both operating
under the same laws, principles, and guidelines. It would be
normal for an appeals court to have a slightly different
interpretation than a lower court, but the radically
divergent views of the Jos court from the Yola tribunal leave
little doubt that something other than the law was factored
in to the final decision.
CAMPBELL