CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): 1ST MEETING OF

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 THE HAGUE 002939

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR AC/CB, NP/CBM, VC/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR CHUPA
WINPAC FOR LIEPMAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): 1ST MEETING OF
LEGAL EXPERTS AT OPCW

This is CWC-123-03.


1. (U) Summary. Two USG legal experts (Bernard Seward from
State/L/ACV - JAGLCS/CLAMO and Randy Pratt from
Commerce/OGC/IS) participated in the first meeting of the CWC
"Network of Legal Experts" November 4-7, supported by the
Commerce representative to the U.S. CWC Delegation (Brandon
Williams). The meeting was useful in providing information
about the status of implementing legislation in the 37 States
Parties participating and in identifying how the USG may
assist interested governments in taking steps toward full
implementation of the Convention. End Summary.


2. (SBU) Attendance: 37 countries sent representatives to
the initial meeting of the CWC Legal Experts Network (LEN)-
Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Benin,
Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Czech Republic, El Salvador,
Ethiopia, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Indonesia, Kuwait,
Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Mexico, Moldova, Morocco, Nicaragua,
Nigeria, Palau, Peru, St. Vincent and Grenadines, Serbia and
Montenegro, Spain, Sri Lanka, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago,
Uganda, UK, USA, Uzbekistan and Viet Nam. Japan and Iran
attended intermittently but did not actively participate. Key
legal and other assistance donor countries such as France and
Australia were missing, and others such as Canada, UK, and
Germany attended only the presentations and otherwise
participated only minimally. Members of their National
Authority or their general legislative drafting departments
represented most recipient countries.


3. (SBU) Comment: According to Technical Secretariat (TS)
Legal Officer Lisa Tabassi, more countries were interested in
participating. However, the TS originally planned for
participation of only 36 countries, so certain countries
which had expressed interest, but which had recently received
sponsorship to other fora were not funded and so did not
participate. End Comment.


4. (U) The first two days of CWC LEN meeting were dedicated
to TS and national presentations. Tabassi began by framing
the discussions for participants by referencing the Action
Plan for Article VII and how the Convention and its
comprehensive implementation complement global
counter-terrorism efforts. Tabassi also discussed various
legal issues including the need to provide legal authority
over "free zones" and "free ports" in CWC implementing
legislation and the need to account for the obligation to
provide legal assistance to other States Party to prosecute
violations of laws prohibiting CW activities. TS Policy
Officer Trapp then provided a detailed brief on the Action
Plan for implementation recently adopted by the OPCW CSP.


5. (SBU) Status of implementing legislation: The attendees
then briefed their status as follows:

-- (SBU) Comprehensive legislation enacted - 11 (Austria,
Belarus, Canada, Czech Republic, Ethiopia, Germany, Peru, St.
Vincent and Grenadines, Spain, UK, and USA). Of these,
Austria, Canada, and Spain indicated updates to legislation
are in process to fill remaining gaps.

-- (SBU) Legislation drafted but awaiting Cabinet/Legislative
approval - 3 (Bangladesh, Morocco, Trinidad and Tobago)

-- (SBU) In process of drafting - 14 (Algeria, Argentina,
Benin, Burundi, Georgia, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico,
Nigeria, Palau, Serbia and Montenegro, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan,
Viet Nam)

-- (SBU) Nothing - 9 (Cameroon, El Salvador, Gabon, Kuwait,
Malawi, Nicaragua, Moldova, Togo, Uganda).


6. (SBU) During presentation of national statements, Togo
and Nigeria publicly specifically requested U.S. help while a
number of other countries also privately approached the Del
for assistance (see para X.). The representatives from
Nigeria, Uganda, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh seemed inclined to
use the TS model law provided in its "National Legislation
Implementation Kit." Moldova, Republic of Serbia and
Montenegro, Trinidad and Tobago, and Togo were interested in
how to implement their laws once they are passed, and/or
being able to describe the resources and regulatory measures
that will be required for implementation during the current
consideration of legislation.


7. (SBU) Most of the countries that had not enacted
comprehensive legislation reported that they currently were
relying on scattered existing legislation for possible
enforcement actions, primarily penal code provisions on
poisons and dangerous substances, environmental regulations,
and customs laws. They recognized, however, that overall
legislation to fill in the gaps, modernize their laws and
provide for declarations and inspections is necessary.


8. (U) On Nov. 6, to facilitate language-based group
discussion, attendees were divided into UN-based language
groups. The U.S. joined the so-called "English speaking"
group (which consisted of all countries that did not speak
Russian, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or French - around 20
countries). No agenda or moderator was provided by the TS so
each group decided for itself what it would do. The
English-speaking group decided to use the time to engage in
bilateral consultations (see para X).


9. (SBU) Del conducted bilateral discussions with Vietnam,
Indonesia, Trinidad and Tobago, Serbia and Montenegro, Togo,
Uganda, and Nigeria each of whom requested specific U.S.
implementation support to facilitate development of a
national authority and facilitate enactment of legislation.
Most requests were for assistance in educating government
ministries, industry and legislators as to the requirements
of the CWC, rather than drafting or other legal assistance.
Discussions surfaced a general theme of implementation
support needs for implementation information and guidance,
industry outreach seminar assistance and government personnel
training. Bangledesh, Sri Lanka, and Cameroon also expressed
interest in assistance, but indicated that timing of such
assistance should follow enactment of legislation. Del
provided each representative with USG contacts for written
requests (State/National Authority - Sidler and CWDel member
- Williams) to initiate dialogue on implementation support
type, timing and intensity.


10. (U) At a sparsely-attended Nov. 7 meeting of the
"English-speaking" group, TS Policy Officer Trapp attempted
to solicit ideas as to what legal assistance could be
provided in the future by the CWC Legal Experts Network (LEN)
and through what mechanisms. In the absence of any reaction,
USDEL led off with its view:

-- (U) Having many of the actual legislative drafters present
was very useful in providing an accurate assessment of the
current state of affairs regarding implementing legislation
in the countries represented.

-- (U) The informal, experts nature of the meeting greatly
assisted the free flow of information and should be
continued. The establishment of points of contact for
legislation greatly improves communication and provides a
conduit for follow-on bilateral and TS action.

-- (U) USG CWC legal experts Seward and Pratt were available
to review draft legislation and regulations and discuss legal
issues, either directly or as part of submissions to the TS
Office of the Legal Adviser.

-- (U) The USG was prepared to entertain requests for other
forms of implementation assistance such as brochures
explaining the CWC to industry or conducting information
seminars. While USG CWC legal experts could not receive
official requests for resource, information or other
non-legal forms of assistance, they could provide information
on how to formally request assistance and would alert the USG
that specific countries were inquiring about assistance.
(Information on USG contacts for such requests -- CWDEL
member Williams and State/MA Sidler -- was subsequently
distributed.)

-- (U) The TS should set up a password-protected area for the
confidential exchange of information among experts. This

SIPDIS
forum should be the main focal point for coordination of the
LEN, augmented by annual meetings. The TS should also
solicit information for and post an informal quarterly update
of the progress countries were making in
drafting/passing/implementing their legislation and
regulations. This site should include copies of national
statements presented during the LEN meeting.


11. (U) There were few other responses. Sri Lanka liked the
idea of a quarterly report. Trinidad and Tobago asked for TS
assistance for the Caribbean regional group and stressed the
need for more interaction among the LEN participants,
specifically requesting establishment of a Commonwealth-based
review and coordination group for legislation.


12. (U) The TS (Trapp) indicated it would be setting up the
website for coordination, will consider annual meetings of
the LEN to monitor and encourage progress, and will solicit
other States Parties participation with a focus on linking
donors to recipients.


13. (U) Javits sends.
SOBEL