Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03THEHAGUE1729
2003-07-07 13:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): 14TH SESSION OF

Tags:  PARM PREL CWC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 THE HAGUE 001729 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR AC/CB, NP/CBM, VC/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS(GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR CHUPA
WINPAC FOR FOLEY

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): 14TH SESSION OF
THE ADVISORY BODY ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL MATTERS
(ABAF),9-13 JUNE 2003

This is CWC-73-03.


(U) Sensitive but unclassified, please protect accordingly.

--------
SUMMARY
--------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 THE HAGUE 001729

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR AC/CB, NP/CBM, VC/CCB, L/ACV, IO/S
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS(GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR CHUPA
WINPAC FOR FOLEY

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): 14TH SESSION OF
THE ADVISORY BODY ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL MATTERS
(ABAF),9-13 JUNE 2003

This is CWC-73-03.


(U) Sensitive but unclassified, please protect accordingly.

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (U) The Advisory Body on Administrative and Financial
Matters (ABAF) of the Organization for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons (OPCW) held its 14th session in The Hague,
from 9-13 June 2003. The primary focus of attention was on
the draft programme and budget 2004, which calls for an 8.36
percent increase in budget level and a 9.0 percent increase
in assessments to Member States. The ABAF noted the lack of
justification or explanation in the text of the document for
major increases and decreases proposed in the budget
estimates and took exception to a number of proposals. Other
items on the agenda also receiving active consideration were
the progress report on the recommendations by the 13 session
of the ABAF, the report on status of income and expenditure
in implementation of the OPCW 2003 programme and budget of 30
April 2003, and the audited financial statements and the
report of the External Auditor. Some items on the agenda were
not considered due to the unavailability of documentation
and/or a shortage of time. End summary.

--------------
ATTENDANCE
--------------


2. (SBU) Attendance at this session of the ABAF was
rather poor. In addition to the Chairman, Farajvand (Iran),
there were only six other members in fairly regular
attendance: Brasack (Germany),Fox (USA),Iossifov (Russian
Federation),Komuro (Japan),Malpaga (Italy),and
Poornalingam (India). Three others, who attended more
irregularly, perhaps due to budget consultations with Member
States being conducted at the same time, were Suarez
(Mexico),Lee (Korea) and Kamron (Pakistan). Kamron
apparently was attending without formal notification of his
membership to the Executive Council and thus his he will not
be named as an attendee in the report on the session. Those
members with apparent budgetary experience appeared to be
Poornalingam, Fox, Kamron, and perhaps Iossifov.

--------------
OPENING STATEMENT BY

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
--------------


3. (U) The DG attended the opening of the session and
delivered a statement indicating his personal endorsement of
the proposed programme and budget for 2004. He noted his
commitment to transparency and his intention to move to
results-based budgeting (RBB) for 2005 as a means to improve
to improve management and to provide better measurement of
resources in terms of results produced. Other points he made
include:

- The proposed increase of 8.36 percent includes 2.92
percent (EUR 2 million) for staff turnover largely due to the
decision on tenure policy, which means the increase is only
5.44 percent without the provision for staff turnover.
- The large increase in official travel (128 percent)
reflects the requirements for full performance of the
organization's work as well as the DG's belief that he must
make visits to Member States to encourage more observance of
the Convention and he also needs to make efforts toward the
goal of universality of the Convention.
- The increase in consultants (94 percent) is because
this is a less expensive way to provide skills and expertise
not available within the Secretariat and it also could help
to improve geographical balance within the organization.
- The Member States need to assist the DG is providing
the necessary leadership for the organization by giving him
more authority for reclassifying and transferring posts.
- This is a barebones budget and reductions would have
serious impact on OPCW effectiveness.

4. (U) The DG also hosted a luncheon for members of the
ABAF on the opening day. The key topic at the luncheon was
the possible use of "on call" Inspectors. The DG stressed
this would be a way to reduce the cost of Inspectors, since
they would not receive the benefits paid for regular
Inspectors, and the use only of retired Inspectors would
assure the quality of those selected. Furthermore, the "on
call" Inspectors would be used only for destruction, which
would avoid confidentiality problems regarding industry
inspections.

--------------
REVIEW OF PROGRESS ON
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 13TH ABAF
--------------


5. (U) The key issue was the failure this year to
implement the recommendation in the report of the 13th ABAF
that actual expenditures for the previous year should be
provided to serve as a point of reference for considering
proposed budget levels. The Indian and U.S. members expressed
the most concern about this matter. The Secretariat indicated
they were reluctant to provide information on 2002 actual
expenditures because of the irregular budgetary situation in

2002. Nevertheless, in response to an ABAF request, the
Secretariat belatedly provided a listing of 2002 actual

SIPDIS
expenditures by programme and assured ABAF that previous year
actual expenditures would be included in the 2005 budget
proposals. The ABAF took official notice of this assurance by
the Secretariat.

--------------
2003 BUDGET STATUS REPORT
AS OF 30 APRIL 2003
--------------


6. (U) The Russian member, especially, took issue with the
heading "Revised Budget" for column 5 of Annex 6 (Expenditure
by programme as 30 April 2003). He and other members
questioned the implication of this heading that the
Secretariat had the authority to officially revise the budget

SIPDIS
that had been approved by Member States. The Director of
Administration indicated that, in accord with Financial
Regulation 4.7, the Secretariat is obligated to manage
expenditures in view of funds available, which meant they had
to take into account the historical pattern of a shortfall in
contributions (as well as transfers to Programme 3 -
International Cooperation and Assistance required by a policy
decision). ABAF commended the Secretariat for observing
Financial Regulation 4.7, but recommended that column 3,
"Anticipated Shortfall", should be deleted and the heading
for column 5 should be changed from "Revised Budget" to
"Allotment".


7. (U) Regarding Annex 7 (Expenditure by Category as of 30
April 2003),the U.S. and Indian members pointed out that the
main objects of expenditures listed reflected more activities
than usual objects of expenditures. The Secretariat explained
that previous efforts to revise the objects of expenditure
had been resisted by some Member States. Nevertheless, ABAF
recommended that the Secretariat should revise the objects of
expenditure in accordance with the practices followed in the
UN common system.


8. (SBU) Regarding Annexes 4 and 5 (concerning
reimbursement of verification costs under Articles IV and V
of the Convention),the ABAF was concerned to see the levels
of outstanding balances of reimbursement payments. The ABAF
noted the claim of the Secretariat that it had substantially
improved the system of invoicing for such reimbursements (a
claim that may have been overstated),but reiterated the need
for the Secretariat to further improve the process of
invoicing. Director of Administration Schulz indicated his
understanding of the need to adjust the invoicing process to
the different requirements of the possessor states, and his
intention to make efforts toward doing so. In view of the low
percentage of payments of the verification reimbursements,
the Italian member, especially, wanted the ABAF to recommend
that the possessor states should expedite their payments.
After some discussion of the propriety of the ABAF making
recommendations directly to Member States on how to manage
their affairs, the Italian member agreed to have the ABAF
just stress the need for expeditious payments by Member
States.

--------------
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND REPORT OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITOR
--------------


9. (U) In response to a recommendation last year by the
ABAF, a representative of the External Auditor presented the
report of the External Auditor on the financial statements of
the organization for 2002. This was appreciated by the ABAF
and it was recommended that this practice be continued in the
future.


10. (U) Among the points raised in considering this item,
the ABAF expressed concern over the delay and the alarming
increase in costs for implementation of the Smartstream
project. The Secretariat acknowledged serious problems in
implementing this project and indicated that the original
assumptions on which it was based were entirely unrealistic.
ABAF thought it was time for an objective review of the
project and thus recommended a critical evaluation by an
external expert of the financial and human resources required
for the project.


11. (U) Another issue under this item concerned the very
low rate of expenditure (often zero) reported for the various
trust funds. While some members of ABAF wondered if this
meant that the need for the funds should be reconsidered, it
was noted that at least some of the funds were just meant to
be available for use when needed rather than be used
continually. The ABAF ultimately just recommended that the
programme managers should take steps to utilize the funds
appropriately in accordance with the mandates for the funds.


12. (U) The report of the External Auditor (para. 16) says
that they "were informed that there were no frauds or losses
in 2002." When questioned by the U.S. member, in view of the
recent history of the organization, the representative of the
External Auditor reiterated the position taken in the report.

--------------
DRAFT PROGRAMME AND BUDGET FOR 2004
--------------


13. (U) In terms of general observations, members of the
ABAF repeated their concern regarding the lack of information
about actual budget expenditures in the previous year. This
led to a recommendation formulated by the Indian member that
budgeted and actual figures for the previous full year should
be provided in all statements and that there should be
adequate explanations for sharp variations in the proposed
budget to provide the necessary basis for consideration of
budget proposals. (Having the two points in the same
recommendation is a bit confusing, but the recommendation
nevertheless is useful.)


14. (U) At the suggestion of the U.S. member, the ABAF
recommended that there should be a consolidated summary table
of the budget including all programmes and sub-programmes in
order to more easily consider all elements in context.


15. (U) In generally discussing the budget, the Secretariat
repeatedly indicated its intention to present the programme
and budget for 2005 in RBB format. Taking advantage of this,
the U.S. member got the ABAF to recommend that the use of the
RBB format should include presentation of an annual budget
implementation report that would contain (a) budgeted vs.
actual expenditures by programmes and sub-programmes, with a
brief explanation of major variances; (b) budgeted vs. actual
expenditures by object of expenditure, again with an
explanation of major variances; and (c) an indication of the
extent to which objectives and outputs had been achieved.


16. (U) Finally, in regard to the planned use of the RBB
format, ABAF members were concerned to learn what the
Secretariat had in mind and what changes may be required in

SIPDIS
the financial rules and regulations. The Secretariat
expressed great confidence in the preparatory work being done
by its consultants on RBB and thought no changes would be
required in the financial rules and regulations.
Nevertheless, the ABAF recommended that plans for use of this
format, including any changes required in the financial rules
and regulations, should be submitted by the Secretariat to
the ABAF at its 15th session.


17. (SBU) In reviewing the Executive Summary of the draft
programme and budget, the Russian member in particular
expressed concern about the proposed increase. Thus, the ABAF
recalled the 9.95 percent increase in the budget for 2003 and
noted the additional substantial increase of 8.36 percent,
with a 9 percent increase in assessments, proposed for 2004.


18. (U) In regard to recosting, the ABAF noted that the
budget had been calculated on the basis of the historical
pattern of inflation and urged that the recosting calculation
be reconsidered before adoption by the Conference of States
Parties. This reflected the observation that inflation levels
now appear to be quite low.


19. (U) The ABAF regretted that the budget did not include
justification or explanation for the major increases and
decreases indicated in the budget tables of the different
programmes. While the Secretariat did sometimes provide oral
or written justifications for some items in response to ABAF
requests, there really was not time for critical review of
these belated justifications which meant that the substance
of the budget was not very rigorously examined by the ABAF,
as is indicated in the ABAF report.


20. (SBU) The ABAF noted the 94 percent increase proposed
for consultants and the fact that many of the Programme
Managers were unable to justify the need for consultants in
their programmes. As a result, the ABAF recommended that the
provision for consultants should be maintained at the 2003
level, and that any increase for consultants beyond the 2003
level should be matched by real savings -- this is in
recognition that the use of consultants could be a more
effective way to accomplish some objectives. The Korean
member insisted on including a dissenting view that got
expressed strangely as calling for further justification to
be provided to him.


21. (U) The ABAF noted that the proposed allocation for
official travel amounts to an increase of 128 percent. Rather
than recommending that travel be held to the 2003 level, ABAF
just noted that an increase of this amount requires a full
and careful justification, which was not presented in the
budget. The Secretariat orally expressed concern about the
need for more travel funds, but not much in the way of
details.


22. (U) There is some confusion in the budget and within
the Secretariat about the staffing levels for 2004. Paragraph
3 (a) in the Executive Summary (p. 7) states that four posts
will be re-activated in view of the needs of the Information
System Branch, the Office of the Legal Advisor and the Office
of Internal Oversight (two in ISB and one in each of the
others). As stated in paragraph 7 (p. 13),this means there
will be 478 positions funded in 2004 compared to 474 in 2003.
Nevertheless, the funded posts indicated in the sections for
each of the programmes add up to 481 posts, a net increase of
seven with a total of nine new or additional posts specified
that are offset by two posts identified for deletion. The
Director of Administration noted there were some mistakes in
the sections for the different programmes and he reaffirmed
that 478 is the correct number of funded positions proposed
for 2004. Nevertheless, some of the Programme Directors stood
by the staffing numbers in their sections, and some even
thought the requests in their sections were understated.

23. Despite an increase of four funded positions, the
number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) will increase by ten,
from 460 in 2003 to 470 in 2004. This presumably reflects a
decreased lag factor for recruitment.


24. (U) ABAF members in general were troubled by the
Secretariat's repeated citing of the 507 approved posts and

SIPDIS
the savings achieved by not filling all of them. The members
thought it would be more realistic and meaningful to write
off the level of 507 posts, since that level had not been
filled for years, and just agree that the number of approved
posts should be those posts approved for funding in each
annual budget.


25. (SBU) There was great concern expressed by some ABAF
members, the Russian and Italian in particular, about the
proposal in the budget (p. 16) that the Director General be
given authority to meet urgent operational requirements by
adjusting numbers in the staffing table provided that (a) he
does not exceed the total of 507 posts and (b) the total
appropriated for staff costs is not exceeded. This concern
reflected the contentious staffing practices of the DG's
predecessor. The DG had vigorously requested the need for
more flexibility in his management responsibilities and some
members were sympathetic to his request, at least within
limits. Therefore, rather than simply rejecting the proposal,
as some members would have liked, the ABAF developed a
recommendation to put some constraints on the proposed
flexibility, i.e., before taking such actions, the
Secretariat should present a full justification for the

SIPDIS
proposal, including reference to changes that may be required
in staff rules and regulations and to provisions that would
govern any re-classification of posts and transfer of posts
among programmes.


26. (U) Although not indicated in the ABAF report, members
did express concern about the 58 percent increase in medical
insurance costs. The Director of Administration indicated
that this increase results in large measure from the
occurrence of some bad illnesses among Secretariat members (a
point that needs further explanation.). He also indicated his
plan to have a consultant examine the organization's
insurance polices.


27. (U) There was much discussion among ABAF members of the
proposed level of EUR 3.9 million for Article IV and V
reimbursements, with many concerned that the proposed level
was too low and others concerned that a higher level would
just add to budgetary shortfalls for the organization. The
Director of Administration stressed that the problem was one
of late payment rather than non-payment and that he had in
mind a mechanism or process for dealing with this problem,
which would not require change in financial rules and
regulations. Rather than addressing the level of
reimbursements, the ABAF recommended that the Secretariat
submit the proposal indicated by the Director of
Administration for review by ABAF and the States Parties.

--------------
Programme 1 - Verification
--------------


28. (SBU) Interesting points that came out in the
presentation of the Director for this Programme and follow-up
discussion included:

- The request for 70 staff members assumes the services
of an additional eight Inspectors on loan; the request would
have to be increased if those Inspectors were not available.
- The Programme Director was unable to explain the need
for consultants for this programme, the request for which had
been inserted at the insistence of the DG.
- The dramatic increase in official travel from EUR
12,000 in 2003 to EUR 52,000 on 2004 reflects significant
under funding in 2003.
- The tenure of a majority of Verification Division staff
will expire at the end of May 2004, and there will have to be
an extension for some beyond the seven year limit in order to
assure the necessary continuity.
- Inspectors kept home are well used: using them in the
Verification Division gives the Inspectors beneficial
experience and makes their field experience more available to
headquarters staff.

29. (U) The ABAF noted that the two "required" additional
staff for the Technical Support Branch in paragraph 1.4.3 are
not actually included among the funded positions for 2004.
Although not noted in the ABAF report, the upgrading of a P-3
to P-4 level in the Chemical Demilitarization Branch cited as
"required" in paragraph 1.4.4 also is not included in the
budget for 2004.


30. (U) There were no ABAF recommendations regarding this
section of the budget.

--------------
Programme 2 - Inspection Management
and Operations (Inspectorate)
--------------


31. (U) Some members of ABAF questioned why there is in
Table 24 (p. 42) an EUR 500,000 request for training of
Inspector candidates in 2004 (compared to nothing requested
for 2003) in view of the fact that one of the basic
assumptions for the 2004 budget (see paragraph 3 of the
Executive Summary, p. 7) was that there would be no hiring of
new Inspectors. The Secretariat explained that the number of
Inspectors would not increase (in fact it will decrease from
174 to 173) but there would be turnover among the Inspectors
and thus the word "new" in that assumption should be changed
to "additional". The training is for the new Inspectors.
However, the Secretariat pointed out that the request for EUR
500,000 presumed the use of "on call" Inspectors (even though
use of "on call" Inspectors is not officially part of the
budget) and EUR 1,000,000 would be required if it turned out
that there would be no "on call" Inspectors.


32. (U) There were no ABAF recommendations specifically
regarding this programme. However, there were three
recommendations in this section of the report calling for
increased information in Tables 15, 16 and 17 in the overview
of Chapter One regarding inspections.

--------------
Programme 3 - International Cooperation
and Assistance
--------------


33. (SBU) There was considerable discussion regarding
whether or not the extra EUR 450,000 added to this programme
for 2003 is or should be provided for in 2004. The
Secretariat indicated that the EUR 114,000 for the new

SIPDIS
programmes in 2003 were included in 2004 but it was up to
Member States whether they wanted in 2004 again to divert
savings of EUR 336,000 from other programmes to ICA. The
Mexican member was very concerned that the extra EUR 450,000
added to this programme for 2003 should be maintained for
2004 and she wanted a recommendation to this effect. The
Chairman indicated he substantively supported such a position
but, much to his credit, he insisted it would be
inappropriate for a technical body like ABAF to make such a
recommendation. Thus the ABAF merely noted the fact that the
level proposed for ICA for 2004 is less than the amount
funded in 2003.

-------------- ---
Programme 4 - Secretariat for the Policy-Making
Organs and Subsidiary Bodies
-------------- ---


34. (U) There was little discussion of this programme and
the ABAF made no recommendations regarding it.

--------------
Programme 5 - External Relations
--------------


35. (SBU) In his presentation and the follow-up discussion,
the Director for this programme made several interesting
points:

- Justification for the request for consultants (EUR
85,000 vs. 0 for 2003) for this programme should be sought
from the DG.
- The increase for official travel (EUR 60,000 vs. EUR
20,000 in 2003) was due at least in large part to the need to
accompany the DG on his increased visits to Member States.
- The new D-1 position in his office came from the office
of the DG and was not requested.


36. (SBU) The Director also insisted that the 2004
allocation for general temporary assistance (GTA) for this
programme should be increased from the EUR 5,000 shown in the
budget (Table 40, p. 68) to EUR 45,000, and that this
increase was approved by the DG. The Director of
Administration did not agree with this and the ABAF decided
it could not accept the change without a piece of paper from
the DG.


37. (U) The ABAF had no recommendations relevant to this
programme aside from its recommendations regarding
consultants and official travel overall.

--------------
Programme 6 - Executive Management
--------------


38. (SBU) The DDG made the presentation for this programme.
He stressed the need for partnership and trust between the DG
and the States Parties and ABAF. In particular, he urged the
need for giving the DG flexibility to reclassify and transfer
posts in order to take advantage of situations as they
develop. He indicated his own priority on working to develop
RBB and otherwise improve budget planning and implementation.
The U.S. member indicated partnership and trust between the
DG and the States Parties and ABAF would be very good for the
Organization and one way to help build that trust would be
for the Technical Secretariat to provide, in accord with RBB,
annual budget implementation reports (resulted in ABAF
recommendation reported in para. 12 above). The U.S. member
also urged that the TS submit a specific proposal for
granting the DG more flexibility regarding reclassifying and
transferring posts (resulted in ABAF recommendation reported
in para. 22 above). The DDG appeared to accept both points.


39. (SBU) Taking advantage of the presence of the DDG and
the Legal Adviser, ABAF members expressed concern about the
excessive use of GTA and, especially, the fact that many GTA
staff have been employed for considerable periods of time.
ABAF members and the Director of Administration indicated
concern that longtime use of GTA staff is unfair since they
often do much the same work as regular staff but are denied
the benefits of regular staff. As agreed by the Legal
Adviser, there is also the concern that this longtime use of
GTA staff could make the organization vulnerable to suits
before the ILOAT that could result in significant financial
liabilities for the organization. It also was pointed out
that the extensive use of GTA staff can be misleading to
States Parties since consideration of the staffing issue
tends to focus on just approved and funded positions while
overlooking the use of GTA staff. As a result, the ABAF
recommended that the Secretariat prepare a report on "all
aspects" of using GTA (implying the concerns expressed above,
but not wanting to be too specific).


40. (SBU) Reflecting concern about the use of overtime, the
ABAF requested information for its next session regarding
average overtime payment per person under each programme
during 2003. The location of this request in this section of
the ABAF report reflects attention drawn to the use of
overtime in the office of the DG especially.

--------------
Programme 7 - Administration
--------------

41. (U) Since this programme was examined toward the end of
the session and the Director of Administration had been
present through so many of the meetings, there was not
prolonged discussion of this programme. However, the ABAF did
note that two branches of this division (Procurement and
Support Services; Information Systems) were each requesting
two additional posts and yet there were still significant
increases in GTA requests for both branches. This was a
matter that was not discussed with the Director of
Administration since it did not arise until the report was
being drafted.


42. (U) The added posts for Information Systems are
officially recognized as being included in the four posts to
be re-activated for 2004, but this is not true for the added
posts for Procurement and Support Services. Thus the latter
two are examples of the confusion regarding staffing levels
in the budget.

--------------
Programme 8 - Common Services Not
Distributed to Programmes
--------------


43. (U) There was some discussion about the anomaly that,
while this programme is for common services not distributed
to programmes, specific shares of allocations in this
programme for GTA, overtime, official travel and consultants
are indicated for each of the programmes in sub-tables within
the separate sections for each of the programmes. However,
the ABAF notes that even this anomalous practice is not
followed consistently, i.e., all funds for consultants are
not included in programme 8 since three programmes have
allocations for consultants within their own budget tables.

--------------
ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND
VICE-CHAIRPERSON
--------------


44. The current chairperson, Mr. Hadi Farajvand (Iran),was
elected to serve again as chairperson for the next session.
Despite his absence from this session, the current
vice-chairperson, Mr. Dudley Lashmar (UK),also was elected
to serve again for the next session. It was agreed that if he
did not show up for the next session, a new vice-chairperson
would elected.

--------------
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
--------------


45. The Executive Council had requested an opinion from the
ABAF on Draft Financial Rule 9.1.02 concerning an upward
revision in the limit on the amount that the Organization is
allowed to invest in one institution. The revision calls for
increasing the limit from EUR 7 million to EUR 12 million in
order to allow the Organization to continue to earn
competitive rates on its short term investments. The ABAF
recommended approval of the draft amendment.

--------------
AGENDA ITEMS NOT COVERED
--------------


46. Due to the lack of availability of the documents on the
"Strategic Plan on External Relations" and the "Strategic
Plan on Information Technology" until the first day of the
session, and due to time constraints, it was agreed to defer
consideration of these agenda items until the next session.
The "Draft OPCW 2005-2007 Medium Term Plan was not considered
because it was not provided.

--------------
OBSERVATIONS/COMMENTS
--------------


47. (SBU) The functioning of the ABAF:

- Lack of documentation in advance was a real handicap.
- The expertise of members could be improved, but it
still provides an opportunity to raise issues that need
attention, which can be of benefit to both the Member States
and the Secretariat.
- While the current Chairman is somewhat handicapped by
his lack of budgetary expertise and his lack of full facility
with the English language, he does make a serious effort to
do good technical work.
- The holding of budget consultations with Member States
at the same time that the ABAF was in session was
unfortunate. If ABAF reports have any value they should serve
to prepare Member States for more effective consultations
with the Secretariat on draft budgets. Since some ABAF
members come from delegations, they had to choose whether to
attend ABAF meetings or the Member State consultations. The
availability of Secretariat members for ABAF meetings also
was limited by their need to attend the Member State
consultations.
- Much better Secretariat support is required for the
ABAF to be as effective as it needs to be. The secretary
assigned to the committee to assist in drafting the report
needs to be knowledgeable regarding administrative and
financial issues and terminology.
- While the Director of Administration was often in
attendance, there should be someone always available from his
staff who is very knowledgeable about both
administrative/financial policies and practices in order to
respond to questions and/or find the appropriate staff member
to provide the responses required.


48. (U) The programme and budget:

- The programme and budget contained very little real
information. In particular, as indicated above, there was a
remarkable lack of justification or explanation for the major
increases and decreases proposed in the budget and there were
too many mistakes or inconsistencies in the budget document.
- The activities in the object of expenditure tables need
to be cleaned out so that the Secretariat could present a
matrix showing how the different programmes compare in use of
various objects of expenditure.
- The 2004 budget talks in terms of moving toward RBB,
but the "objectives" presented in the tables for the
different programmes most usually were really activities
rather than objectives. The budget clearly at this stage is
very much an input budget with little information about
results planned or achieved.


49. (U) The move to RBB:

- The Director of Administration is very pleased with the
consultants working on converting the organization to RBB. He
notes they did this for ILO. It would be good to examine the
success of RBB in ILO and to see some sample of what the
consultants are doing for OPCW before it is too late.
- Success in using RBB is going to require a major
re-education of both the Member States and the Secretariat.
It is not clear what plans exist for this.


50. (U) The use of consultants:

- The Director of Administration is proud of the use of
Korn-Ferry to screen candidates and the use of another firm
for providing a psychological profile of candidates. Both
sound promising, but it would be interesting to know the
costs for these services and to get some objective evaluation
of the psychological profiling especially.


51. (U) The seven-year limit as an opportunity:

- The Director of Administration often referred to the
seven-year limit for staff tenure as an opportunity for
reshaping and updating the organization. This sounds
promising and efforts should be made to assure that advantage
is taken of this opportunity. Informal consultations on the
matter could be useful.


52. (SBU) Fraud:

- As noted above, the report of the External Auditor
indicates he was told there "were no fraud or losses in
2002." Such a claim for any organization must raise
questions, and the recent history of OPCW makes such a claim
especially questionable. It might be useful to probe deeper
on this matter with the representative of the External
Auditor to be sure there is not some cover-up at work.


53. (U) Javits sends.
BAILY