Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03THEHAGUE1390
2003-06-02 15:27:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

HOLOCAUST ART RESTITUTION: SEMINAR EXPLORES ROLE

Tags:  KNAR PHUM AORC NL IBPCA 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001390 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR OHI

PARIS ALSO FOR USREP UNESCO

E.O. 12958 N/A
TAGS: KNAR PHUM AORC NL IBPCA
SUBJECT: HOLOCAUST ART RESTITUTION: SEMINAR EXPLORES ROLE
FOR INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION


UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001390

SIPDIS

STATE FOR OHI

PARIS ALSO FOR USREP UNESCO

E.O. 12958 N/A
TAGS: KNAR PHUM AORC NL IBPCA
SUBJECT: HOLOCAUST ART RESTITUTION: SEMINAR EXPLORES ROLE
FOR INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION



1. Summary and Action Request: The Permanent Court of
Arbitration hosted a seminar to explore whether
international arbitration is a suitable mechanism for
resolving claims involving Nazi-looted art. Legal experts
agreed that arbitration could play a useful role and some
advocated establishment of a standing arbitral body to
handle such disputes. Art historians stressed that support
for high quality archival research was a key element in
establishing provenance and resolving claims. The PCA will
convene a small working group of interested legal experts to
consider next steps. The PCA would welcome the
participation of a USG expert in the process should we wish
to identify one. We would appreciate guidance on how to
respond to PCA's invitation for USG participation on the
working group. End Summary


2. The Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)
brought together international legal experts and art
historians on May 23 in a seminar to discuss resolution of
cultural property disputes. The purpose of the seminar -
which focused on claims associated with Nazi-looted art -
was to identify the key issues in resolving stolen art
claims and consider whether international arbitration
mechanisms could play a useful role.


3. Several of the legal experts (including Owen Pell of the
law firm White and Case and Hans Das of the Catholic
University of Leuven) argued that national dispute
settlement measures are inadequate as they often turn on the
sheer happenstance of where the art has come to rest - with
some jurisdictions completely precluding recovery. Legal
experts were also confident of finding acceptable ways to
bridge systemic differences between countries with civil law
and common law systems regarding issues such as evidentiary
standards, burdens of proof, and applicability of
purchasers' good faith. These legal experts suggested that
a standing arbitral body modeled on that modeled on the Law
of the Sea Convention could play an important role in
resolving Holocaust and other stolen art-related disputes.


4. Some conference participants were not convinced that
establishment of an international arbitration mechanism is
necessary or worthwhile. While not directly conveying these
misgivings during the public sessions, they told us on the
margins that most cases are being adequately handled through
national or alternative dispute settlement mechanisms and
that only a handful of cases would ever be referred for
international arbitration.


5. Art historians underscored that a relatively complete
accounting of World War Two-era looted art can only come
about through more extensive and higher quality archival
research. This requires familiarity not only with the
location of relevant archives but their organizational
structures and recordkeeping quirks. Extensive online
databases, one historian noted, are of limited value because
of the inconsistent and imprecise manner in which individual
works are described and recorded. Several historians noted
the specialized nature of provenance research and that only
a handful of people currently have the training and
background. They also cited European privacy laws as
obstacles to tracking down looted art and establishing
provenance.


6. Comment: Although the PCA has not taken an
institutional position on whether international arbitration
is a suitable mechanism for resolving claims involving Nazi-
looted art, PCA officials have determined that additional
work to explore this possibility would be valuable. PCA
General Counsel Freedburg noted that the PCA intends to
convene a small working group of experts to consider next
steps and indicated that the group would include experts
from American law firms and art museums such as the National
Gallery of Art. She said the PCA would welcome the
participation of a USG expert in the process should we wish
to identify one. End Comment

Sobel