Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03TEGUCIGALPA2551
2003-10-30 20:00:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Cable title:  

Biotechnology Regulations: Honduras

Tags:  EAGR ECON ETRD SENV TBIO PGOV HO TSLP 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 TEGUCIGALPA 002551 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT (DMALAC),OES/ETC(HLEE),AND
WHA/CEN
USDA FOR USDA/FAS/OA/BSIMMONS AND USDA/APHIS/BRS/JTURNER
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USAID FOR JLEWIS
STATE PLEASE PASS TO FDA FOR RLAKE
STATE PLEASE PASS TO EPA FOR JANDERSEN
GUATEMALA FOR AGATT

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD SENV TBIO PGOV HO TSLP
SUBJECT: Biotechnology Regulations: Honduras

REF: State 263456

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 TEGUCIGALPA 002551

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT (DMALAC),OES/ETC(HLEE),AND
WHA/CEN
USDA FOR USDA/FAS/OA/BSIMMONS AND USDA/APHIS/BRS/JTURNER
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USAID FOR JLEWIS
STATE PLEASE PASS TO FDA FOR RLAKE
STATE PLEASE PASS TO EPA FOR JANDERSEN
GUATEMALA FOR AGATT

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD SENV TBIO PGOV HO TSLP
SUBJECT: Biotechnology Regulations: Honduras

REF: State 263456


1. Post contacted Carlos Almendares, the GOH official most
directly responsible for biotechnology issues, and received
the information below. Mr. Almendares is the Chief of the
Seed Certification Department in the Honduran National
Service for Animal and Plant Health (abbreviated SENASA,
equivalent to our APHIS),within the Ministry of Agriculture
and Livestock. The following answers are keyed to the
questions in paragraph 4 of reftel.

Q1. What are the dates relevant laws and regulations became
effective?

A1. The Phytozoosanitary Decree 157 was passed in 1994.
This law establishes that the National Service for Animal
and Plant Health (SENASA),in co-ordination with the
Ministry of Health, has the responsibility for issuing
regulations for the import and use of biotech products.

The regulations based upon this law were approved and came
into effect in 1998. These regulations were based upon
those of Mexico, Argentina and Colombia, though the Honduran
regulations are less strict than those of the other
countries.

In addition, a National Committee of Biotechnology and
Biosafety was established in 1997 and meets four times a
year. This committee is made up of representatives from the
following organizations:
- the Seed Certification Department of SENASA,
- the Sanitary Regulations Department of the Ministry of
Health,
- the Biodiversity Unit of the Ministry of Environment and
Natural Resources,
- the Pan American School of Agriculture at Zamorano,
- the Honduran Foundation of Agricultural Research (FHIA),
- the National University (UNAH),
- the National Council for Science and Technology (a semi-
autonomous government institution),
- the National Association of Seed Producers and
Distributors (an industry organization),and
- the Standard Fruit Company (someone with a scientific

background).

Q2. Is there a regulatory process in place for approving
products of agricultural biotechnology for import or sale?
If so, please provide a brief description of this process.

A2. The approval process for the import or sale of biotech
products is as follows.

First, any party which wishes to import or distribute any
seeds in Honduras, whether biotech or not, must register
with SENASA and pay a registration fee of 1,500 Lempiras
(USD 86). The registration process is simple - a one page
application. In addition, if the party wishes to import a
biotech product, they must pay an additional registration
fee of 5,000 Lempiras (USD 286).

Then, the party that wishes to import biotech products must
submit an application to SENASA, which passes it on to the
National Committee of Biotechnology and Biosafety.

The National Committee requires a risk evaluation of the
product in question. In some cases the Committee has
accepted the results of an analysis done by another country.
(For example, import of corn BT was approved based on an
analysis done by the FDA.) However, the Committee usually
recommends that the risk analysis be performed in Honduras.
Currently there are three organizations which conduct these
risk evaluations: the Honduran Foundation of Agricultural
Research (FHIA),the National University (UNAH),or the Pan
American School of Agriculture at Zamorano.

If the risk evaluation is performed in Honduras, the
importing party is responsible for the cost. The risk
evaluation can take as little as three months, but in one
case (a variety of banana) has been ongoing since 1997.

As part of the risk evaluation, the effectiveness of the
biotech product is also tested. For example, if a variety
claims to be drought-resistant, tests are also performed to
evaluate whether the variety truly is resistant to drought
in the Honduran context - essentially, whether the product
does what it claims to do.
The National Committee reviews the application and the risk
evaluation and makes a recommendation on whether or not to
allow the import of the product. However, the final
decision is made by the head of SENASA.

Q3. Which governmental departments or ministries monitor
and/or enforce the laws or regulations? If possible, please
provide contact information for a government official within
each department or ministry which plays a role in the
regulation of agricultural biotechnology.

A3. In the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock:

Carlos Almendares
Chief Department of Seed Certification
Avenida La FAO, Edificio SENASA
2do. Piso - Sanidad Vegetal
Tel. (504) 239-7270
E-mail:calmendares81(at)yahoo.com
certisem(at)optinet.hn

Eduardo Salgado
Sub-Director of Plant Health
Avenida La FAO, Edificio SENASA
2do. Piso - Sanidad Vegetal
Tel. (504) 235-8425
E-mail: escambar(at)yahoo.es

Lizardo Reyes
General Director SENASA
Avenida La FAO, Edificio SENASA 3er Piso
Tel. (504) 239-7067
E-mail: direccionsenasa(at)multivisionhn.net
senasa-sag(at)multivisionhn.net

Q4. What does this monitoring and/or enforcement by the
government departments or ministries entail? What are the
penalties for failing to comply?

A4. According to the law, penalties for failing to comply
with the regulations range from 100 to 100,000 Lempira (USD
6 to USD 5,737 at the current exchange rate). The maximum
penalty is reserved for cases of serious harm to human,
animal or plant health or irreversible damage to the
environment or ecosystem. However, Mr. Almendares of SENASA
knows of no case in which any fine has actually been imposed
for failure to comply with laws concerning biotech products.

Q5. Are shipments of agricultural products tested for
biotech content, and if so, whether this testing is done on
a random or regular basis?

A5. No shipments are tested at the port of entry to
determine if they contain biotech content. The only testing
done is as part of the risk evaluation, as explained above
in A2.

Q6. Has the country put in place or is it contemplating
implementing a traceability system for the products of
agricultural biotechnology, and if so, the details of this
system?

A6. A traceability system is currently being considered by
the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, and may be put
into place as early as April 2004. The system would be
managed by SENASA.

Q7. Is special documentation required for agricultural
products which may contain the products of agricultural
biotechnology? If so, what types of documentation are
required?

A7. At the port, there is no special documentation required
for the import of biotech products (as long as their import
has been approved through the process described in A2
above).

Q8. Are in-country field tests required prior to regulatory
approval of a biotech crop?

A8. Yes, field tests are required as part of the risk
evaluation included in the application process described in
A2.

Q9. Exactly what constitutes a complete packet of
information required by government regulators for
consideration of approval of a biotech crop?

A9. The National Committee of Biotechnology and Biosafety
requires the following information:


1. Staff information: Names, addresses and telephone numbers
of people that have developed and/or supplied the regulated
product.


2. Purpose: Detailed description of the purpose of the
regulated product, (i.e., drought resistance, pest
resistance, etc.)


3. Description of genetic material: Description of the
genetically modified material in the organism and how it
differs from the non-modified organism.


4. Transformation methods: Place and country where the
organism was developed and produced; methods of
transformation and selection processes used.


5. Production system: A detailed description of the
molecular biology of the system used to produce the biotech
product (example: donor-recipient-vector).


6. Evaluation location: If a risk evaluation for the product
in question has already been performed, the country and
specific location of the evaluation.


7. Biosecurity measures: A detailed description of the
processes and security measures used in the country of
origin, and that will be used in Honduras, to avoid
contamination and dissemination of the regulated product.


8. Intended destination: A detailed description of the
intended destination, uses and distribution of the regulated
product (for example: location of green houses, labs, field
tests, pilot projects, production, dissemination,
processing, sale, distribution).


9. Containment measures: A detailed description of the
procedures, processes and security measures proposed that
will be used to prevent the escape and dissemination of the
regulated product at each of the intended destinations
listed in 8, above.


10. Final disposition: A detailed description of the
proposed method for final disposal of the regulated product.


11. Bibliography: A list of any articles or research
pertaining to the regulated product.

Q10. Must foods containing the products of agricultural
biotechnology be labeled, and if so, what threshold
percentage of both intended and adventitious presence would
trigger the labeling requirement?

A10. Currently, Honduras has no labeling requirements for
biotech products.

Q11. If a label is required for food and feed containing
the products of agricultural biotechnology, what are the
contents of a label text?

A11. n/a

Q12. What level of food products (i.e. unprocessed vs.
consumer-ready) must carry a label?

A12. n/a

Q13. Is there any law or regulation governing the use of
labels such as "biotech-free", "non-biotech," "GMO-free" or
"non-GMO?"

A13. No, there is not.

Q14. In countries where no formal laws or regulations have
been promulgated or enforced, what is the likelihood that
the host government will enact them in the near future?

A14. n/a

Palmer