Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ROME5127
2003-11-13 08:31:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

PROPOSED COEXISTENCE DECREE COULD EFFECTIVELY BAN

Tags:  EAGR ETRD IT EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 005127 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

USDA FOR OSEC HEGWOOD
USDA FOR OSEC SIMMONS
STATE PASS USDA/FAS BLUM AND E. JONES
STATE PASS USTR

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ETRD IT EUN
SUBJECT: PROPOSED COEXISTENCE DECREE COULD EFFECTIVELY BAN
BIOTECH CROPS IN ITALY

REF: A. (A) MILAN 465

B. (B) MILAN 512

C. (C) MILAN 512

D. (D) MILAN 523

E. (E) ROME 3481

(U) Sensitive but unclassified.

UNCLAS ROME 005127

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

USDA FOR OSEC HEGWOOD
USDA FOR OSEC SIMMONS
STATE PASS USDA/FAS BLUM AND E. JONES
STATE PASS USTR

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ETRD IT EUN
SUBJECT: PROPOSED COEXISTENCE DECREE COULD EFFECTIVELY BAN
BIOTECH CROPS IN ITALY

REF: A. (A) MILAN 465

B. (B) MILAN 512

C. (C) MILAN 512

D. (D) MILAN 523

E. (E) ROME 3481

(U) Sensitive but unclassified.


1. (SBU) Summary: Agriculture Minister Alemanno has
drafted a decree-law that could effectively ban GM planting
in Italy -- almost certainly in 2004 and quite possibly
beyond. He plans to present it at an upcoming meeting of the
Council of Ministers. If enacted, the decree law would apply
criminal sanctions for any use of GM seeds in any Italian
area where EU-recognized "DOP" foods are planted. While
Alemanno may simultaneous agree to lift the so-called Amato
Decree (banning four varieties of EU-approved GM corn),the
proposed coexistence decree would put in place an even more
restrictive regime. Several GOI ministers dislike Alemanno's
anti-biotech crusade, but our discussions to date indicate
that few, if any, ministers are willing to actively oppose
the decree law, in order not to aggravate growing tensions
within the governing coalition. Nevertheless, Ambassador's
discussions of U.S. concerns this week at the Office of the
Prime Minister and at the MFA offer grounds for optimism that
the GOI may not act as precipitously as Alemanno wishes
(details reported septel). End Summary.


2. (SBU) Embassy Ag Attache has obtained a copy of a decree
law on coexistence, drafted by Minister Gianni Alemanno's
agriculture ministry, that was recently circulated to other
concerned government ministries and to regional governments.
While the language of the draft legal decree is vague, it
purports to establish the regulatory framework for the
coexistence of transgenic, conventional, and organic
cultivation in Italy. In fact, Embassy believes that it
would institute a de facto ban on biotech crops, certainly in
2004 and probably beyond. If adopted by the Council of
Ministers, these coexistence rules will take effect
immediately and be subject to Parliamentary ratification
within sixty days. According to Alemanno, beginning in 2004,
any Italian region in which products registered under the
EU's scheme of geographical indications and denominations of
origin ("DOP") are produced will be declared GM-free.
Beginning in 2005, Italy's 20 regions will be given the

discretion to make this decision. The law includes sanctions
and criminal penalties, including prison terms. MinAg
officials have told us that this decree law will be proposed
to GOI,s Council of Ministers as early as November 14.

Draft Alemanno Decree-Law
--------------


3. (SBU) Highlights of the draft decree law are:

-- Adventitious presence (AP) of biotech material is limited
in conventional seeds to "below the detectable level" and
prohibited (zero tolerance) in organic seeds.

-- Agricultural production must give consumers a choice
between transgenic and non-transgenic products. A separate
production line must keep transgenic from organic and
conventional lines.

-- For the 2004 planting season, no biotech seeds may be
planted in Italian regions now producing products protected
under the EU "DOP" regime. Beginning in 2005, each region
will determine which areas may be declared GM-free and what
distances will be required between non-biotech and biotech
plots. Each regions will also be allowed to designate
GM-free areas for "structural reasons incompatible with
co-existence."

-- The onus of keeping biotech separate from conventional and
organic production is placed on the grower of biotech crops.
Those growers who fail to keep biotech separate can be fined
2,600 to 25,900 euros and may be imprisoned.

-- The decree law establishes a Ministry of Agriculture
institution for research on the environmental impact of
biotech, charged with monitoring transgenic production.


4. (SBU) After obtaining leaked drafts of the draft decree


law, Agatt and Senior Agricultural Specialist met November 5
with the Agricultural Minister's Diplomatic Advisor Raffaele
de Lutio and with MinAg Chief of Food Quality Giuseppe
Ambrosio to confirm the text of the draft coexistence decree
law and to clarify the draft's many ambiguities. Ambrosio
confirmed the text of the draft decree and that it would soon
be presented to the Council of Ministers. A 2004 seed
circular would subsequently give more specifics on
adventitious presence of GM in conventional seed shipments.
Ambrosio argued that the decree was not so bad as it appeared
-- it did mention the concepts of GM planting and
coexistence. Perhaps one day conditions would permit the
actual planting of GM seeds. That time, however, has not
yet arrived, according to Ambrosio. Asked to explain whether
the draft decree's "separate production line" applies to
cultivation in Italy or also for imports of soybeans and meal
for feed, Ambrosio denied that this would apply to imported
feed ingredients. He stated that it was valid only for crops
grown in Italy. (Note: The "separate production line"
appears to add significant burdens to producers of EU-allowed
biotech crops, exceeding the requirements of the EU,s agreed
Traceablity and Labeling and Food and Feed laws. )

Adventitious Presence - Zero Tolerance
-------------- --------------


5. (SBU) The draft coexistence decree-law proscribes
adventitious presence (AP) of biotech in seeds. The absence
of an EU-agreed Seed Directive gives Alemanno what he
believes to be the freedom to continue to stipulate zero
tolerance. Alemanno created havoc in the summer of 2003 with
zealous enforcement of his second annual ruling on what
levels of AP are admissible in seeds for planting, reported
extensively in reftels A, B, C, D, E. Alemanno,s seed
plans, as set forth in the new coexistence law, will feature
more of the same, although he will also give more specifics
in a 2004 Seed Circular. MinAg officials point to improved
prospects for U.S. seeds exports because the Circular's seed
protocol has been tweaked by widening the sample size to
3,000 seeds. This may slightly improve the chances for U.S.
seed to comply with this strict threshold.

Good-bye Amato Decree, Hello (Non)Coexistence


6. (SBU) Ambrosio confirmed that, in conjunction with the
introduction of the coexistence decree-law, Minister Alemanno
will move to repeal the Amato Decree, which bans four
EU-approved biotech corn varieties. Repeal of the Amato
Decree has been promised privately on numerous occasions, but
on November 5 Minister Alemanno was quoted in the press as
claiming that a the Amato Decree is being repealed
principally because of pressure from the EU. (Note: Since
August 2000, the Amato Decree, although challenged in the
European Court of Justice, has been upheld. This was based
on reasoning that the Precautionary Principle allowed Italy
to put the ban in place "temporarily" because the GOI had
doubts about the EU review of health and environmental
effects of biotech corn. Italy was thus allowed to prohibit
biotech corn based on doubts alone, unsubstantiated by any
empirical evidence. This impeded imports of corn for feed
(corn gluten feed ingredients) and corn seeds for planting.
End Note.)

Reaction: Predictably Mixed
--------------


7. (SBU) There has been mixed initial reaction among
Italy,s agricultural interests to the proposed decree. One
of the three farmers, organizations raised objections, one
expressed reservations about the law's vagueness, and one
endorsed the draft law. The organization Confederazione
Italiana Agricoltori,s publicly stated reservations are
cautious, in line with the organization's past reluctance to
publicly declare itself in favor of biotech for fear of the
appearance of caving in to multinational corporate pressure.
News reports tallied twelve of Italy,s twenty regional
agriculture advisors as favoring the draft law. Reaction
among other groups follows predictable lines with greens and
environmental groups applauding the measures.

Embassy Analysis: Implications of the Decree


8. (SBU) There are no regions in Italy without products


registered under the EU,s scheme of geographical indications
and denominations of origin. EU-protected products in Italy
number over 125, and none of them are candidates for gene
flow from any biotech cultivation that could be contemplated
by Italian farmers in the near future. If adopted, this law
could potentially keep biotech out of Italy for the
foreseeable future, just as the EU is getting close to
putting in place provisions to enable the biotech approvals
process to get started again. Unlike the Austrian bid to
justify GM-free zones, Alemanno,s coexistence rules appeal
to local and regional beliefs that traditional food products
are a crucial patrimony. By giving regions the authority to
decide what areas are to be biotech-free from 2005 and into
the future, he is also deflecting troublesome decisions from
his Ministry and pushing it into the regional agricultural
leaderships, hands. Moreover, U.S. conventional seed trade
with Italy will continue to be thwarted by arbitrary AP
levels. Assobiotech, the umbrella organization representing
biotech industries in Italy, has spearheaded a Brussels
initiative to inform EU officials of aspects of the proposal
that run contrary to EU law. If the Italian coexistence law
is allowed to stand unchallenged by the EU, Italy will have
positioned itself even further as the most biotech-unfriendly
Member State in the EU.


9. (SBU) Existing procedures for registering a new seed
variety in Italy are rigorous and should satisfy Italian
regulatory concerns. The coexistence law ignores existing
Italian seed registry rules, which already require that any
new seed variety undergo two years of field testing in
Italian soil and a review by a board appointed by the
Ministry of Agriculture. Banning biotech based on
"contamination" of typical products ignores the fact that the
Ministry of Agriculture controls these through field testing.


10. (SBU) The GOI,s Council of Ministers can adopt or
reject Alemanno,s coexistence law. In Italy, decree- laws
circumvent lengthy legislative procedures and are intended as
a mechanism to deal with emergencies. Senator Ronconi,
Chairman of the GOI Senate Agriculture Committee, has stated
publicly that issuing this rule as a law decree is
unwarranted. A senior Environment Ministry official told
emboff Nov. 7 that the decree is scientifically unjustified
and probably unconstitutional, but he predicted that no
minister would oppose Alemanno in the Council of Ministers.
His point was that, while Government cohesion faces serious
challenges on other, "more crucial issues", no minister will
choose to pick a fight over this decree.

Ambassador's Interventions
--------------


11. (SBU) Given the potential seriousness of this
decree-law, before departing for Washington Ambassador
Sembler raised the matter this week in discussions with the
Prime Ministry and Foreign Ministry. These discussions,
offer grounds for optimism that the Italian cabinet will not
act precipitously to enact the Alemanno decree-law. Details
to follow septel.
SKODON


NNNN
2003ROME05127 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED