Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ROME4348
2003-09-24 12:38:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

REPORT OF FAO 104TH FINANCE COMMITTEE

Tags:  AORC KUNR ABUD FAO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 004348 

SIPDIS


FROM THE U.S. MISSION TO THE UN AGENCIES

STATE FOR IO/S ABRAHAMS AND JACOBSON AND IO/EDA BEHREND
AND KOTOK
USDA/FAS FOR REICH AND HUGHES
PARIS FOR UNESCO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KUNR ABUD FAO
SUBJECT: REPORT OF FAO 104TH FINANCE COMMITTEE

UNCLAS ROME 004348

SIPDIS


FROM THE U.S. MISSION TO THE UN AGENCIES

STATE FOR IO/S ABRAHAMS AND JACOBSON AND IO/EDA BEHREND
AND KOTOK
USDA/FAS FOR REICH AND HUGHES
PARIS FOR UNESCO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KUNR ABUD FAO
SUBJECT: REPORT OF FAO 104TH FINANCE COMMITTEE


1. Summary. The 104th Session of FAO's Finance
Committee met September 15-19 to discuss a number of
issues particularly relevant to the Council/Conference
meetings later this year. Top of the list was budget and
finance for the upcoming biennium. Whereas the
Organization outwardly continued to display an assumption
that the next budget would allow at least zero real
growth, the Secretariat and member states understood well
that neither the US nor Japan, who together cover forty
percent of regular contributions, continued to support,
at best, the zero nominal growth policy of the recent
past. The US' willingness in the end to not block
consensus on split assessments broke us out of total
isolation and left us much better positioned to mobilize
support for a tight budget policy. Other member states
across the board considered this a major concession on
our part. Further on the budget, the Secretariat noted
that with 2003 payments by Japan and the US still
delayed, the organization would within the next several
weeks begin preparations to borrow to meet current
obligations. The secretariat noted that FAO has been
receiving annually approximately $3-4 million revenue
from Oil for Food projects in Iraq. Its Iraq programs in
2003 will generate about $9 million.


2. The Committee agreed to support our call for a
Secretariat action plan to rectify the existing under

SIPDIS
representation of some states, especially the US, on the
organization's staff. A decision was reached to
recommend that the Council begin to fund the large
outstanding after service medical cost liabilities by
agreeing to a 2004-2005 budget resolution that includes
$14.1 million to match the amount of the liability to be
amortized during the biennium. At the same time it asked
for an assessment of the current medical scheme afforded
FAO staff. End summary.


I. Budget and Split Assessments
--------------


3. The big issue in the September 15-19 104th FAO
Finance Committee meeting was the budget for the next
millennium and specifically how the organization would
cope with the large revenue short-fall generated by the

recent decline in the dollar-euro rate. Although the
Secretariat and many member states preferred to talk in

SIPDIS
terms of zero real growth (ZRG),or positive real growth,
the organization could see the writing on the wall as
both the Japanese, who were talking about possibly
supporting a negative nominal growth budget, and
ourselves, who spoke of zero nominal growth (ZNG),laid
down an uncompromising position against real growth.
Canada and Australia also supported ZNG while the EU's
common position was still ambiguous due to fragmented
member views. The UK, who represented the EU, told us
that the UK supported ZNG.


4. The discussion heated markedly, however, when we
argued strenuously against a split assessment. US del
mapped a strong argument against multiple currency
assessments and shot back when both the Secretariat and
other member states accused us of trying to avoid the
costs ("like all the other members face") of exchange
rate fluctuations, responding that the rate cuts both
ways, depending on its direction of movement, and the US
paid much more to the organization than a real ZRG
formula would have dictated when the dollar appreciated
just a few years ago. We argued for transparency and
discretion in order for member states to make a
deliberate decision on how much exchange rate loss or
gain they wanted to assume.


5. Our position, nevertheless, met a solid wall of
opposition. Whereas many states admitted they understood
our position in principle, they said they did not think
it feasible to talk of a ZNG budget under current
exchange rate circumstances where FAO faced a rigid short-
run fall in revenues. The US was totally isolated, with
Canada, the EU, and Japan all supportive of adopting
split assessments in FAO. Canada, in fact, used its
position as chair of the program committee to launch a

sharp vitriolic specific attack on the US during a joint
finance-program committee session, accusing us of
pursuing self-interest at the expense of other member
states as well as the organization. Canada's outspoken
rep misrepresented our position on a number of points,
and it was possible to successfully hollow out his
aggressive intervention.


6. At the end of the Tuesday session, we remained alone
in our opposition to split assessments and as the
discussion was on the verge of collapse, US del, as per
instructions, said that while we remained strongly
opposed to split assessments we had not necessarily an
intention to break a consensus on this issue. The
Committee chairman quickly took advantage of this opening
to postpone further discussion, and asked us to meet with
the secretariat to see if the most recent proposal could
cover our concerns over transparency and discretion. In
a subsequent discussion with budget director Tony Wade,
Wade readily agreed to our request to have exchange rate
effect explicit in the budget resolution. He also
suggested a statement expressing the Committee's intent
to distinguish the split assessment, as a technical
mechanism, from the political process of establishing
budget levels. His statement ["The use of a split
assessment does not preclude discretion on the part of
the membership in determining whatever budget level it
thinks fit."] was included in the Finance Committee
report.


7. The Committee report also noted, "One member was
opposed in principle to the split currency assessment
concept, but did not wish to block a consensus view.
This member stressed the need to ensure 1) transparency
in the way the impact of exchange rate fluctuations would
be reflected in the budget of the organization; and 2)
continued discretion among the members regarding the
budget level (i.e., no automaticity)." It added our
other point: "This member also proposed that those member
countries that strongly support the proposal might
provide voluntary contributions to offset FAO's costs
(ranging between $150,000 to $250,000) to implement split
assessments."


8. From the overwhelming comments of other member
states, it appeared that our final position on the split
assessment was accepted as both principled and pragmatic.
It also appears now that we will be in a much stronger
position for leading other like-minded member states in
opposition to calls for a positive or zero real growth
budget than if we had blocked the consensus on split
assessments.


9. The Committee mandated the Secretariat to do a "how-
to" guide on how split assessments will be administered,
to be ready well in advance of discussion at the upcoming
Council meeting. The Secretariat is also preparing a
paper on the impact of a zero nominal growth budget, with
a split assessment, on the organization.

II. Geographic Distribution
--------------


10. On another issue of prime importance to us, US del
refused to join consensus during the discussion on
proposals calling for a new methodology for determining
equitable geographic distribution among FAO employees.
He argued that we need to see what the Secretariat is
doing to rectify the current imbalances before addressing
methodologies. (Most Committee members favored option 2
and a few, option 3. There was no support for option 1.)
The Committee, without the US, had difficulty deciding
which of the alternate methodologies it wished to
propose, and finally called for the establishment of a
working group to review how many posts would be included
in the base figure, the weight of each of the factors
used in the alternate proposals, and timeframe issues.
On the final day during the report drafting session, the
US del said that the US could support the creation of a
working group if the secretariat would provide an action
plan outlining further concrete measures it would take to

redress under-representation of certain members' states
when the results of the working group were tabled in the
May 2004 session. The Committee agreed to this
formulation and we joined in supporting a working group
and the development of an action plan.

III. Unfunded After-Service Medical Costs
-------------- --------------


11. Returning to the discussion of unfunded liabilities
for after service medical costs, the secretariat's
presentation showed that the current procedure of
earmarking investment income to cover the liability was
vastly insufficient. In its discussion of the problem,
the Committee unanimously agreed that a solution had to
be implemented. There was no support for a lump some
assessment to cover the liabilities, but agreement with
broad support was reached for funding them through its
regular program budget. The Committee recommended that
the 2004-2005 budget resolution include $14.1 million to
match the amount of the liability to be amortized during
the biennium. At the same time it asked for an
assessment of the current medical scheme afforded FAO
staff. An executive summary of a recent 400-page study
on this subject will be prepared for Committee members.

IV. Other Agenda Matters
--------------


12. Finance and Budget Reports - In its financial
highlights presentation, the secretariat noted that the
general fund continued to reflect a net deficit position.
With 2003 payments by Japan and the US still delayed, the
organization would, before long, need to borrow to meet
current obligations. The secretariat noted that FAO has
been receiving annually approximately $3-4 million
revenue from Oil for Food projects in Iraq. Its Iraq
programs in 2003 will generate about $9 million. The
organization is prepared to move ahead with other Iraq
programs if asked to do so, a secretariat rep noted. The
Committee agreed to program and budgetary transfers as
requested. It approved a proposal to add an additional
investment officer to the treasury operations branch, to
be funded from investment income. There was agreement
that extra-budgetary activities should be covered by
support costs and that the ceiling rate paid for
emergency assistance projects be increased from 6.0 to
6.5 percent. It denied a request by the Indian Ocean
Tuna Commission to waive support costs, and reaffirmed
the view that there should be a uniform policy toward the
support costs paid by all entities soliciting project
activities. It asked for a Secretariat information paper
on recent trends in support costs and on the calculation
of a methodology applied in recovering them.


13. Finance and Budget Matters - An incentive scheme to
encourage prompt payment of contributions was approved at
the proposed discount rate. The Committee endorsed for
Council consideration the establishment of a capital
expenditures facility.


14. Oversight Matters - The Committee reviewed line-by-
line a report on the progress of the external auditor's
report. It appeared that there had been progress;
however, the presentation was unspecific in regards to
when specific recommendations would be met. The
Committee requested that a progress report be part of
each meeting and that specific time frames be established
for completing action. The audited accounts (FAO Credit
Union and Commissary) were approved.


V. Committee Meeting
--------------


15. The Finance Committee Meeting was capably chaired by
Humberto Oscar Molina Eyes (Chile). Other participants
were Anthony Beattie (UK),Ryuko Inoue (Japan),Lamya Al-
Saqqaf (Kuwait),Muhammad Saleem Khan (Pakistan),
Alassasne Wele (Senegal),Lothar Caviezel (Switzerland),
Perpetual M.S. Hingi (Tanzania). FODAG DCM J. Michael
Cleverley represented the US.

CLEVERLEY


NNNN
2003ROME04348 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED