Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ROME3381
2003-07-24 14:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

ONTENEGRO: POSSIBLE DJUKANOVIC INDICTMENT

Tags:  IT MW PGOV PREL SR EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 003381 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/SCE AND EUR/WE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 0718/2018
TAGS: IT MW PGOV PREL SR EUN
SUBJECT: ONTENEGRO: POSSIBLE DJUKANOVIC INDICTMENT

REF: . BELGRADE 1650


B. BELGRADE 1592

C. 2 ROME 2729

CLASSIFIED BY: A/POLITICAL MINISTERCOUNSELOR GARY ROBBINS, REASONS 1.5
(B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 003381

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/SCE AND EUR/WE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 0718/2018
TAGS: IT MW PGOV PREL SR EUN
SUBJECT: ONTENEGRO: POSSIBLE DJUKANOVIC INDICTMENT

REF: . BELGRADE 1650


B. BELGRADE 1592

C. 2 ROME 2729

CLASSIFIED BY: A/POLITICAL MINISTERCOUNSELOR GARY ROBBINS, REASONS 1.5
(B) AND (D)


1. (U) ITALIAN PRESS REPORTING OF THE POSSIBLE INDICTMENT OF
MONTENEGRO'S PM DJUKANOVIC FOR CIGARETTE SMUGGLING HAS BEEN
MUCH LESS EXTENSIVE THAN THAT IN SERBIA-MONTENEGRO. THE
INITIAL PRESS REPORTS JUNE 30 HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY FOLLOW-UP
HERE IN ITALY. THIS IS IN SHARP CONTRAST TO THE SITUATION
REPORTED IN REF C, WHEN A DIFFERENT PROSECUTOR (IN BARI)
LEAKED THE NEWS THAT HE WAS CONSIDERING AN INDICTMENT ON
SIMILAR CHARGES, AND THE STORY DRAGGED ON FOR WEEKS.


2. (SBU) NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS FOR PETAR PAVIC, CHARGE OF THE
EMBASSY OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO (AMB. MIODRAG LEKIC, A
MONTENEGRIN BUT NO FRIEND OF DJUKANOVIC, ENDED HIS TOUR IN
JUNE). PAVIC HAS BEEN DREADING THE USUALLY PERSISTENT
QUESTIONING OF THE ITALIAN PRESS, BUT THUS FAR HAS NOT BEEN
APPROACHED BY ANYONE. THE LONG-TIME MONTENEGRIN
REPRESENTATIVE IN ROME, LJUBOMIR PEROVIC, HAS BEEN MORE
ACTIVE, GIVING INTERVIEWS TO MONTENEGRIN RADIO AND OTHERS.
PEROVIC TOLD POL MC THAT HE CAN'T BELIEVE THE CHARGES OF
RECENT (SINCE 2001) CIGARETTE SMUGGLING COULD BE VALID, AS NO
ITALIAN OFFICIAL HAS RAISED THE ISSUE WITH HIM SINCE THAT
TIME. CLEARLY FRUSTRATED THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME
CONTACTS IN NAPLES THAT HE HAD IN BARI (WHERE HE WAS YUGOSLAV
CG SEVERAL YEARS),PEROVIC IS FOCUSING MORE ON A BLANKET
DENIAL OF THE CHARGES THAN IN ENGAGING (AS HE DID IN LAST
YEAR'S CASE) ON SPECULATION ABOUT POLITICAL CONSPIRACIES.


3. (C) UK DCM TOLD EMBASSY THAT THE ITALIAN AMBASSADOR IN
BELGRADE HAD TOLD EU COLLEAGUES THAT THERE WAS IN FACT
CONCRETE EVIDENCE OF DJUKANOVIC'S AWARENESS OR INVOLVEMENT IN
RECENT SMUGGLING ACTIVITIES. (PEROVIC HAD HEARD THE SAME
THING AND SOUGHT TO CONVINCE POL MC THAT THE ITALIAN
AMBASSADOR COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE SUCH DOCUMENTS). THE
DIRECTOR OF THE MFA'S BALKANS OFFICE, FERNANDO GENTILINI,
CONFIRMED THAT THE POTENTIAL CHARGES IN NAPLES ARE MORE
RECENT AND MORE SERIOUS THAN THOSE INVESTIGATED LAST YEAR BY
THE BARI PROSECUTOR.


4. (C) GENTILINI ALSO TOLD POLOFF ON JULY 11 THAT THE MFA HAD
RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM THE PROSECUTOR IN NAPLES FOR AN
OPINION AS TO WHETHER PRESIDENT DJUKANOVIC AS "HEAD OF
GOVERNMENT," WOULD BE IMMUNE FROM PROSECUTION IN RELATION TO
REFTEL CHARGES. GENTILINI SAID THAT THE MFA WAS WORKING ON
AN ANSWER "AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS." THE ANSWER WOULD BE
NEITHER SIMPLE, NOR "BLACK AND WHITE." THE PROSECUTOR GAVE
NO DEADLINE TO RECEIVE THE ANSWER; GENTILINI SEES AS A
POSITIVE SIGN THE FACT THAT THE PROSECUTOR ASKED AT ALL - HE
WAS NOT OBLIGED TO. ITALY HAS INFORMED ITS EU PARTNERS OF
THIS DEVELOPMENT (GENTILINI REQUESTED THAT WE NOT SHARE WITH
ANYONE THE FACT THAT ITALY HAD INFORMED ITS EU PARTNERS. IT
COULD BE A PROBLEM FOR THE MFA IF SUCH INFORMATION GOT BACK
TO THE PROSECUTOR.) IF AN INDICTMENT/ARREST WARRANT IS
ISSUED, WE NEED TO COORDINATE CLOSELY ON A WAY AHEAD,
GENTILINI CONCLUDED. AS OF JULY 24 THE MFA HAD NOT
COMMUNICATED ITS DECISION TO NAPLES, ACCORDING TO GENTILINI.


5. (C) COMMENT: AS WE NOTED LAST YEAR, THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT
DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO INITIATE, DIRECT OR QUASH
INDICTMENTS, WHETHER AIMED AT ITALIAN OR FOREIGN PERSONS,
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OR PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS. THIS POWER
RESIDES WITH THE FULLY INDEPENDENT ITALIAN JUDICIARY. IT IS
UNUSUAL IN THIS CASE THAT THE PROSECUTOR ASKED THE MFA FOR AN
OPINION ON WHETHER DJUKANOVIC COULD BE INDICTED. IN OUR
OPINION, AND THAT OF ITALIAN AND OTHER DIPLOMATS WITH WHOM WE
HAVE DISCUSSED THE CASE, DJUKANOVIC'S CURRENT POSITION DOES
NOT AFFORD HIM ANY IMMUNITY UNDER ITALIAN OR INTERNATIONAL
LAW. HOWEVER, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PROSECUTOR (FOR
WHATEVER REASON) MAY BE SEEKING AN EXCUSE NOT TO PROCEED WITH
THE INDICTMENT. GIVEN THE PROBLEMS BOTH THE PROSECUTOR AND
THE ITALIAN MFA HAD TO FACE AFTER THE 1999 INDICTMENT OF THEN
MONTENEGRIN FM PEROVIC, IT WOULD NOT SURPRISE US IF BOTH
INSTITUTIONS WOULD PREFER TO AVOID A SIMILAR, BUT WORSE,
HEADACHE. OF COURSE, NO FACTS ABOUT THE ITALIAN JUSTICE
SYSTEM WILL PREVENT DJUKANOVIC AND SUPPORTERS FROM TAKING THE
MORE APPEALING COURSE: SEEKING TO CONVINCE EVERYONE
(INCLUDING THEMSELVES) THAT THIS IS JUST A POLITICAL
CONSPIRACY DESIGNED TO PRESSURE HIM ON INDEPENDENCE OR OTHER
ISSUES. END COMMENT.
SEMBLER

NNNN
2003ROME03381 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL