Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ROME2436
2003-06-04 05:16:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

PNR, SAFE HARBOR: ITALY PRIVACY DISCUSSIONS

Tags:  ECPS ETRD IT EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 002436 

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR
STATE PASS FTC
DEPT FOR EUR/WE, EUR/ERA, EB/CIP
USDOC 4212/ITA/MAC/OEURA/CPD/DDEFALCO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ETRD IT EUN
SUBJECT: PNR, SAFE HARBOR: ITALY PRIVACY DISCUSSIONS

(U) This cable is sensitive but unclassified. Please
protect accordingly. Not for Internet distribution.

Ref: Rome 1528

UNCLAS ROME 002436

SIPDIS


SENSITIVE

STATE PASS USTR
STATE PASS FTC
DEPT FOR EUR/WE, EUR/ERA, EB/CIP
USDOC 4212/ITA/MAC/OEURA/CPD/DDEFALCO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ETRD IT EUN
SUBJECT: PNR, SAFE HARBOR: ITALY PRIVACY DISCUSSIONS

(U) This cable is sensitive but unclassified. Please
protect accordingly. Not for Internet distribution.

Ref: Rome 1528


1. (SBU) Summary: Secretary General of the Italian
Privacy Authority Buttarelli expressed strong opposition
to the interim PNR agreement in a meeting with Econcouns
May 27. Buttarelli believes that Commission officials
made a mistake in agreeing to PNR as this violates
national laws. The principal problems Buttarelli sees
relate to a foreign country's authorities being allowed
directly to access data held in Italy, as well as the
subsequent use of such data. Buttarelli is, however,
optimistic that a satisfactory compromise may be reached
in the fall. Separately, regarding Safe Harbor,
Buttarelli provided statistics showing that the system is
seldom used by Italian companies and may soon be
obsolete. End summary.

PNR
---


2. (SBU) May 27 Econ counselor and Econ specialist met
with Italian Privacy Authority Secretary General Giovanni
Buttarelli to discuss Italy's position on PNR and Safe
Harbor. The Italian Privacy Authority has been very
critical of the interim PNR agreement negotiated between
the U.S. and EU, and how this was handled by the
Commission. Italian Privacy Authority chairman, Stefano
Rodota, recently wrote the Commission to this effect.
Buttarelli said that Brussels authorities had made a
mistake when they signed the PNR agreement, since this
violates national laws. He also maintained that U.S.
officials have been misled regarding the value of a U.S.-
EU joint statement. This is not a treaty and may not
overrule national laws.


3. (SBU) Buttarelli indicated that one key problem is
that the PNR agreement would allow a foreign government
to do what national authorities are not allowed to do.
He pointed out that "not even the head of the Italian
police has the authority to access flight information."
Buttarelli told EconCouns that only very recently has a
bill been presented in the Italian parliament to allow
police officers "who are physically located in airports"
to access flight information. According to Buttarelli,
it is unacceptable and illegal that a U.S. authority,
"and not even necessarily a law enforcement official," be

allowed to access, from the U.S., data held in Italy. One
partial solution would entail relevant data being
transferred from Italy to the U.S. (as opposed to being
accessed from the U.S.) However, in his view, even then
there would remain the problem of how the data is handled
and for what purposes it is used. Adding to Italy's
concern is the fact that other countries, such as Canada,
Mexico and Australia, are considering similar measures to
those in the U.S. This would be even more unworkable, he
stated.


4. (SBU) Buttarelli, however, expressed optimism
regarding a possible compromise agreement. He expects
that there will be a series of proposals tabled and that,
gradually, a compromise satisfactory to all would be
reached. In late June or July, the EU Privacy
Authorities and the member states will meet to express an
opinion on proposals. Buttarelli believes that an
informal agreement may be reached by September, but that
it is unlikely to be ratified by the EU parliament before
year's end.


5. (SBU) Regarding the related AFIS issue, Buttarelli
indicated that he has been approached by the ATAA (Air
Transport Association of America) regarding a possible
meeting for EU Privacy authorities in July in Washington.
Buttarelli indicated that he thought this was a good
idea, especially if appropriate USG officials either
joined in the ATAA meetings or held separate meetings
with the privacy authorities. He was looking at a
possible two-day trip in early July. One day could be
dedicated to discussion of AFIS/PNR. A second half-day
could be dedicated to discussion of safe harbor.


Safe Harbor
--------------


6. (SBU) Regarding Safe Harbor, Buttarelli believes that
this may be a good time to review the matter. At the
same time, however, he quoted a recent survey conducted
among Italian firms, which indicated that 85 percent of
Italian companies transferring data to the U.S. adopt
consensus methods; most others use contracts, and only 3
percent rely on Safe Harbor. Buttarelli also told
EconCouns that a letter from U/S Aldonas had been
received in Brussels as a follow-up to the EU
Authorities' visit to Washington in 2002 (reftel),but
that the content was not substantive. He noted that a
DVC promised in the letter never took place.


7. (SBU) Comment: Despite his opposition to PNR on
principal, Buttarelli appeared optimistic regarding a
possible compromise solution this year. We are also
encouraged by his willingness to accept ATAA's invite and
by his desire to set up a July meeting with appropriate
USG officials. Regarding Safe Harbor, Buttarelli remains
as critical as he has been from the start, and is
signaling that the system may become obsolete rapidly
through use of alternative (better, in his view) tools.
Sembler
NNNN
2003ROME02436 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED