Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03RANGOON300
2003-03-06 06:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rangoon
Cable title:  

ILO PUSHES FOR PROGRESS ON FORCED LABOR

Tags:  ELAB PHUM PREL BM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000300 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND DRL
LABOR FOR ILAB
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2012
TAGS: ELAB PHUM PREL BM
SUBJECT: ILO PUSHES FOR PROGRESS ON FORCED LABOR


Classified By: COM CARMEN M. MARTINEZ FOR REASON 1.5(D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000300

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND DRL
LABOR FOR ILAB
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2012
TAGS: ELAB PHUM PREL BM
SUBJECT: ILO PUSHES FOR PROGRESS ON FORCED LABOR


Classified By: COM CARMEN M. MARTINEZ FOR REASON 1.5(D).


1. (C) Summary: On February 28, ILO Liaison Officer Ms.
Perret-Nguyen provided Emboffs with a status report on her
efforts to engage the regime on forced labor before the ILO
Governing Board meeting on Burma in late March. Ms.
Perret-Nguyen has been focusing on getting the regime to
accept a plan of action on forced labor to present to the
Governing Board. To date, the regime has not agreed to
include even minimally necessary elements in the plan of
action such as a pilot project area or a mediator. In
addition, the military, the primary user of forced labor in
Burma, still remains off limits to the government's
implementation committee on forced labor. Ms. Perret-Nguyen
is encouraging the U.S. and others to impress upon the
Burmese government the importance of providing at least a
minimally acceptable plan of action to the GB. Otherwise,
she expects GB members will have run out of patience with
regime delays and move to enforcing sanctions. End Summary.

No News is Bad News


2. (C) ILO Liaison Officer Ms. Perret-Nguyen told Emboffs on
February 28 that she is frustrated with the lack of progress
on forced labor in Burma since her arrival in Rangoon six
months ago. Specifically, she said the Convention 29
Implementation Committee the government established in
response to the ILO's call for action on forced labor
continues to be ineffectual and the government is dragging
its feet on submitting a meaningful plan of action to the
Governing Body.


3. (C) Perret-Nguyen said the Implementation Committee
members are always polite and cordial to her but on substance
there has been no progress. She said that when she brings
allegations of forced labor to the committee's attention it
invariably reports back that there was no evidence to support
the allegations or, if there was evidence, military
operations were involved and the committee could not
intervene. She said that she continues to receive credible
reports that forced labor continues unabated in all areas
where the military is active. Perret-Nguyen is convinced
that the military commanders have not received any

instructions on how to implement the 1999 and 2000 directives
issued to curtail the use of forced labor, so they continue
with past practices. She said that the patience of the
Governing Body with the regime's delays on taking action
against forced labor are wearing thin and the government
needs to provide clear evidence that it will put action
behind its words at the March Governing Body meeting.

Key Elements In Plan of Action


4. (C) Ms. Perret-Nguyen said she has worked hard to
convince the regime of the benefits of a sound plan of action
on forced labor but it has been very slow going. She has
focused on the following priorities: 1) the designation of a
mediator or facilitator to receive complaints and liaise with
the Implementation Committee; 2) an assessment of the
complaints evaluation system; 3) a study of alternatives to
the use of forced labor; 4) the reform of the system for
inspections and allegation verifications; 5) a public
information campaign; and 6) an ILO-funded pilot area.
Perret-Nguyen said that although the ILO and the government
have exchanged drafts of a proposed work plan they are "no
where near" agreement on a text. She said her encouragement
that when the regime begins to show action on the problem
assistance will be forthcoming appears to be falling on deaf
ears.


5. (C) As the Governing Body meeting draws near,
Perret-Nguyen has honed in on obtaining a minimally
acceptable plan of action from the government just to have
something to show at the meeting. Her office would not claim
that this minimal plan is sufficient but it would give the GB
something to review. Her bottom line on a "minimally
acceptable" plan would include the creation of a mediator and
the acceptance of a pilot project, points the government has
not yet been willing to accept. She said that even if the GB
determines that this minimal plan is not good enough, she
could use that feedback to push for a better plan.

Last Ditch Efforts?


6. (C) Perret-Nguyen said she hopes the regime relents at
the last minute and agrees to the minimally acceptable plan
of action, noting that the regime has a history of responding
to the ILO officials when they are at the airport about to
leave Rangoon. For example, she said, when she was departing
for Geneva for the last GB meeting, the regime presented her
with three points or concessions to address ILO concerns.
(Note: One of these was to appoint a representative of the
Inspector General's office to the Implementation Committee in
order to provide the committee with a link to military
authorities; this appointment never materialized according to
Perret-Nguyen. End Note.) She said she hopes the regime will
do the same this time and present her with the minimally
acceptable work plan just before she leaves town. She is not
convinced, however, that the regime understands the
importance of delivering a plan of action to the GB meeting.
She senses that either the regime does not understand that GB
patience for continued delays has run out or that it does not
care. She requested that the U.S. provide any support it can
prior to the GB meeting to impress upon the Burmese that it
is time for action on forced labor. She said she has
approached others in the diplomatic community to support her
efforts. If the regime does not accept at least some of the
ILO's recommendations for the plan of action, Perret-Nguyen
believes the GB will toughen its stance and revisit
implementation of sanctions agreed to in 2000 but held in
abeyance pending actions by the regime.


7. (C) Comment: The Chief of Mission will meet with the
Minister of Labor to impress upon him the importance of
demonstrating to the GB the regime's commitment to addressing
forced labor. We will point out the benefits of a pilot
project and a mediator, and encourage an improved
investigation and enforcement mechanism. Unfortunately, it
is likely that the Minister of Labor understands these issues
all too well but is not in a position to determine whether or
not to cooperate with the ILO. The junta's military leaders
dictate these matters and they have a long-held vested
interest in using forced labor to support the military
infrastructure. Perret-Nguyen noted that the military
continues to remain outside the Implementation Committee and
does not appear to have any commitment to reducing forced
labor. Until this changes, we can expect cooperation with
the ILO mission to be slow at best. End Comment.
Martinez