Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03OTTAWA202
2003-01-17 22:55:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ottawa
Cable title:  

CANADA: ARF STATEMENT SHOULD REFLECT CONSENSUS

Tags:  PREL CA ARF 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L OTTAWA 000202 

SIPDIS

FOR EAP/RSP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2003
TAGS: PREL CA ARF
SUBJECT: CANADA: ARF STATEMENT SHOULD REFLECT CONSENSUS

REF: STATE 13788

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor, Brian Flora. Reason 1.5b.


C O N F I D E N T I A L OTTAWA 000202

SIPDIS

FOR EAP/RSP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2003
TAGS: PREL CA ARF
SUBJECT: CANADA: ARF STATEMENT SHOULD REFLECT CONSENSUS

REF: STATE 13788

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor, Brian Flora. Reason 1.5b.



1. (C) Post provided Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs
and International Trade (DFAIT) Deputy Director for Regional
Security and Peacekeeping Division, Sarah Smith and Deputy
Director for Korea, Hartmuth Kroll, talking points and texts
of the proposed statement by the Chairman of the ASEAN
Regional Forum (ARF),the Chairman's letter to ARF member
states, and the proposed U.S. alternative language as
contained in REFTEL on January 16. Smith told poloff that
Canada had already received copies of the ARF Chairman's
letter and proposed statement and Canada's Ambassador to
Cambodia would be engaging the ARF chairman concerning the
Government of Canada's thoughts on the draft statement. She
noted that her government was in the process of preparing
alternative language and though not able to share it with the
U.S. at that time, would do so as soon as it was fully vetted
through her government.


2. (C) On January 17, Smith and Kroll provided poloff the
following suggested amendments to the ARF Chairman's
statement:

quote:
Proposed Amendments by Canada
para 1. (no change) The ASEAN Regional Forum, the only
regional political and security forum in the Asia-Pacific,
remains deeply concerned over the negative impact on the
situation on the Korean Peninsula of recent actions by the
DPRK with respect to its nuclear program which negatively
affect pace, stability and security in the region and the
integrity of the international non-proliferation regime.
Further development of this program could also undermine the
confidence and security-building measures being undertaken by
the ARF.

para 2. ARF participating states are seriously concerned by
the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's non-compliance
with international non-proliferation norms, and in particular
its announcement of its withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation
Treaty and to terminate its safeguards cooperation with the
IAEA.

(Our preferred option is to delete para 3. Otherwise , we
would redraft as follows)

para 3. The ARF takes note of the 1994 Framework Agreement
between the DPRK and the USA, which recognizes the obligation
to observe international non-proliferation commitments.

para 4. All ARF participating states support a nuclear-free
Korean peninsula. Adherence to norms of international
non-proliferation and the exercise of self-restraint by all
parties at his juncture are critical to the maintenance of
peace and security on the Korean peninsula.

para 5. The ARF believes that there is a basis for a
diplomatic resolution which could contribute to the reduction
of tensions on the Korean peninsula and to the settlement of
the fundamental issues. We welcome recent proposals which
have been forthcoming in this regard and encourage the DPRK
to respond positively.

para 6. In this light, the ARF call on the DPRK to resume
its cooperation with the IAEA and to reverse its decision to
withdraw from the NPT. At the same time, it urges all
parties concerned to engage in dialogue and consultation to
address and settle the concerns of all in order to bring
about a peaceful, secure and nuclear-free Korean peninsula.
end quote


3. (C) After presenting Canadian's suggested changes, Kroll
said his government believes the ARF Chairman would be more
likely to acccept suggested edits to his original proposed
statement rather than a complete redraft such as the U.S.
proposal (reftel). He stressed, however, that the ARF
Chairman be made to understand the importance of consistent
messaging on this sensitive issue and that it is critical
that ARF members not break ranks or issue inconsistent
signals that the DPRK could exploit. He added that Canada is
not, repeat not, in favor of any language that would frame
the current developments on the Korean peninsula as a
bi-lateral problem. Both Kroll and Smith stressed that
regardless of the eventual language used, the ASEAN member
states must reach consensus, and if that takes time -- so be
it.
KELLY