Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03KATHMANDU427
2003-03-07 11:32:00
SECRET
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: INDIAN AMBASSADOR SAYS MAOISTS THREATENING

Tags:  PGOV PREL PTER NP IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000427 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS
LONDON FOR POL/REIDEL
NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/06/2013
TAGS: PGOV PREL PTER NP IN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: INDIAN AMBASSADOR SAYS MAOISTS THREATENING
TO END DIALOGUE

REF: KATHMANDU 408

Classified By: Ambassador Michael Malinowski for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d
)

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000427

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS
LONDON FOR POL/REIDEL
NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/06/2013
TAGS: PGOV PREL PTER NP IN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: INDIAN AMBASSADOR SAYS MAOISTS THREATENING
TO END DIALOGUE

REF: KATHMANDU 408

Classified By: Ambassador Michael Malinowski for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d
)


1. (S) Summary: According to Shyam Saran, India's Ambassador
to Nepal, continued disagreement on the terms of a code of
conduct for the current cease-fire has led Maoists to
threaten an end to preliminary talks about future peace
negotiations with the GON. At the heart of the disagreement
is the Palace's refusal to accept the Maoist demand that
government forces cease security operations. In a March 7
conversation with Ambassador Malinowski, Saran described the
Maoists' ambiguous stance on the future of the constitutional
monarchy. Saran reported that his Embassy has told Maoist
leaders that if they want a dialogue with Indian diplomats,
they must cease all illegal activity within India's borders.
End summary.


2. (S) In a March 7 conversation with Ambassador Malinowski,
Indian Ambassador Shyam Saran disclosed that in discussions
with Indian Government (GOI) contacts the Maoists have
threatened to break off talks with the GON because of
disagreement on the cease-fire's proposed code of conduct.
According to Saran, a draft code of conduct by the Maoists,
vetted by the GON's advisory committee, contained a provision
prohibiting search operations by the Royal Nepal Army (RNA)
and police forces. The provision was rejected by the Palace,
with a handwritten note from King Gyanendra stating "this
does not apply to the RNA."


3. (S) Saran explained that the draft provision did not
explicitly require that the security forces "return to their
barracks," one of the Maoists' reported demands. According
to RNA Chief of General Staff Victory Rana, while the RNA is
not currently conducting specific search and destroy
missions, regular patrols continue. If the patrols spot
unlawful behavior, including the carrying of arms or wearing
of Maoist uniforms, they intervene. Comments by Brig. Gen.
Gaurav Rana (reftel),commander of the 5th Brigade in the
far-western region, corroborate this policy.


4. (S) Ambassador Saran indicated that Indian diplomats in
Nepal are not in direct contact with the Maoists, but that
the GOI has opened other channels of communication with the
insurgents. It was through these channels that the Maoists
had conveyed complaints about the late-February arrest of
several cadre in Patna, Bihar. The GOI had responded that
"if you break the law in India you will get arrested," and
told Maoist leaders that if the party wants a formal dialogue
with India, they need to discontinue their activities south
of the border.


5. (S) Saran indicated that the Maoists are being
intentionally ambiguous about their support for the
constitutional monarchy. When asked, a Maoist source
reportedly replied that the insurgents "support multi-party
democracy" but are "mum" on the question of the future of the
constitutional monarchy. When asked if remaining "mum" was
an indication of support, the source refused to elaborate.
On the issue of a constituent assembly, Saran said that
Maoist sources have stated that their advocacy of such an
assembly is "not written in stone." The Indian Ambassador
agreed with Post's assessment that, should the Maoists decide
to abandon the peace talks, they would likely telegraph their
intentions by instructing their agents first to begin citing
incidents of alleged GON non-cooperation and publicizing
complaints against the negotiating team.


6. (S) Comment: Disagreement over the code of conduct could
presage a pattern familiar from the first round of talks:
impose an impossible demand on the GON and break off
negotiations when the government fails to meet it. The King
is highly unlikely to hobble the RNA as demanded, especially
since the Maoists have not disarmed. Rhetoric and complaints
are likely to increase in the coming weeks, with the Maoists
proclaiming their commitment to the talks and decrying the
GON's purported failure to cooperate. History need not
repeat itself, however. It is questionable whether the
Maoists are prepared to resume hostilities, and the King has
made it clear to us that he expects discussions with the
Maoists to be protracted. Under such circumstances,
disagreements, posturing and threats are to be expected.
MALINOWSKI