Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03KATHMANDU2444
2003-12-16 09:23:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: MAOIST EXTORTION DEMAND AGAINST COCA-COLA

Tags:  ASEC PTER CASC ECON NP BXEP 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 002444 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS, DS/IP/SA, DS/DSS/OSAC, DS/T/ATA AND S/CT
FOR AMB. COFER BLACK; LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY; NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/14/2013
TAGS: ASEC PTER CASC ECON NP BXEP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: MAOIST EXTORTION DEMAND AGAINST COCA-COLA
FACILITY

REF: A. A) KATHMANDU 2042

B. B) KATHMANDU 1822

C. C) KATHMANDU 2429

D. D) KATHMANDU 2332

Classified By: DCM Robert K. Boggs for reasons 1.5 (B,D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 002444

SIPDIS

STATE FOR SA/INS, DS/IP/SA, DS/DSS/OSAC, DS/T/ATA AND S/CT
FOR AMB. COFER BLACK; LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY; NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/14/2013
TAGS: ASEC PTER CASC ECON NP BXEP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: MAOIST EXTORTION DEMAND AGAINST COCA-COLA
FACILITY

REF: A. A) KATHMANDU 2042

B. B) KATHMANDU 1822

C. C) KATHMANDU 2429

D. D) KATHMANDU 2332

Classified By: DCM Robert K. Boggs for reasons 1.5 (B,D)


1. (C) Summary. According to NN Singh, General Manager for
Coca-Cola in Nepal, the Coca-Cola bottling plant in
Bharatpur, Chitwan District, received an extortion letter
from the Maoists on December 11 followed by a telephoned
deadline of December 15. During a follow-up meeting on
December 15 with Embassy officials, Singh reported that
because of a Maoist called strike (bandh) in the area, the
factory closed early on December 15. Coca-Cola's Chief
Security Officer in Nepal has contacted the Army and the
Chief District Office with information on the extortion
demand. Embassy officials advised that payments to the
Maoists would violate U.S. law and that passive postures
taken in the past might not stop the demands. Embassy
officials suggested that Coca-Cola consider a media
initiative to highlight the economic costs of Maoist
extortion. End Summary.


2. (C) According to NN Singh, General Manager for Coca-Coca
in Nepal, the Coca-Cola bottling plant in Bharatpur, Chitwan
District received an extortion letter on December 11
demanding NRs 1 million (equivalent to USD 13,500). During a
follow-up meeting on 15 December with RSO, Econoff and the
Embassy's Senior Security Investigator, Singh indicated that
he had received a follow-up phone call earlier in the day
indicating that Coca-Cola had until 1700--or another three
and a half hours--to make a decision. The phone call, traced
by the Army to a local public phone, indicated that if
Coca-Cola did not pay the demand, it would "face the same
fate of Surya Nepal" (a local tobacco company). (Note: Last
week, Surya Nepal reportedly received a extortion letter that
the Maoists copied to the Kathmandu Post, a local English
newspaper. The Kathmandu Post published an article about the
extortion demand, which alleged that the Maoists demanded

NRs. 5 million (equivalent to USD 67,000) by 26 December or
the factory and its employees would face "dire consequences."
On December 16, Surya Nepal's Managing Director confirmed
the news story. Despite numerous telephone calls from the
Maoists reiterating their demands, the Maoists have not yet
followed through with their threats. End Note.)


3. (C) Singh mentioned that Col. Mohan Singh, Coca-Cola's
Chief Security Officer in Nepal, has passed information to
the local Army commander and to the Chief District Office
(CDO). Because of a Maoist-called strike (bandh) in the
Terai today, many local government offices are closed. Singh
requested that the RSO pass this information to his contacts
in the Nepali police. RSO indicated that he would share the
information, but noted that the Embassy cannot guarantee
security to Coke's facilities and that GON resources are
stretched in this area already. Singh acknowledged the
Embassy's and GON's limitations and noted that the Embassy's
past efforts had led to increased security around the plant.


4. (C) Singh reluctantly reported that Coca-Cola
distributors in Butwal recently paid the Maoists. The head
of the distributorship paid a total of NRs 700,000
(equivalent to USD 9,500).


5. (SBU) Embassy officials noted that since the addition of
the Maoists to the U.S. terrorism finance list on October 31,
payments to them are prohibited by U.S. law. Econoff noted
that a U.S. affiliated company (viz., Colgate Palmolive) was
in a similar predicament recently and decided to close
temporarily until the Maoists withdrew their demand (ref A).
Econoff also pointed out that a public media campaign might
be an option. The media campaign could highlight:
-- Coca-Cola's global policy against the payment of extortion
and Coca-Cola's history in Nepal;
-- Possible consequences of continued Maoist threats against
Coca-Cola's facilities and investment in Nepal;
-- The trickle-down effect on the 400 Nepalese directly
employed and the 30,000 indirectly employed by Coca-Cola;
and,
-- The good public relations work that Coca-Cola does in the
area of employee pensions and benefits, free health care for
its workers, and its new high school scholarship program for
young women in rural Nepal.

6. (C) Singh stated that he had e-mailed Coca-Cola's
regional office in Bangkok about the demand on December 15
and that it is likely that Bangkok will contact Coke's
headquarters in Atlanta. Singh remarked that Coke HQ in
Atlanta has a tendency to contact Department of State's
security offices in Washington when threats to its investment
are made. Finally, Singh stated that he would keep the
Embassy informed of the status of this issue.


7. (C) This is not the first extortion demand that
Coca-Cola has received (ref B) and weathered successfully.
The previous demand had a "firm deadline" of September 30,
which reportedly was not paid by Coca-Cola. Following this
demand the Embassy unofficially recommended that Singh and
two of his top managers leave Nepal over the Nepalese
holidays of Dasain and Tihar (in September/October) until the
situation calmed down. During the meeting on December 15,
RSO mentioned that if Singh had personal safety concerns
perhaps he should consider another extended holiday away from
Nepal. Singh remarked that he did not view the recent demand
as a personal threat, rather it was a threat to Coca-Cola's
viability in Nepal.


8. (C) Comment. Extortion by the Maoists are at an
all-time high. This underscores the need for Anti-Extortion
Investigative training, which Post requested in ref C. Per
ref D, it appears that the Coca-Cola facility in Bharatpur is
becoming a more visible target for the Maoists. (Note: Singh
mentioned that Coke makes an annual profit of only USD 2
million from its activities in Nepal, so in economic terms if
the threats continue, Coke might close operations. End Note.)
No one has attempted a media counter-attack against the
Maoists. If Coca-Cola's headquarters generates the press
release, it might actually reinforce to the Maoists that
Singh and Coca-Cola Nepal have no say in the matter.


9. (C) Comment Continued. Although previous extortion
demands have been made by the Maoists (ref B) and have not
been acted upon, given the low profit margin, growing
insecurity and increased demands, it appears that Coca-Cola's
options are shrinking. If the investment climate does not
improve in the near future, Coca-Cola might decide to close
operations altogether. In the end, if the Maoists continue
to threaten Coca-Cola's investment in Nepal, the real losers
could well be the Nepalese people and economy. End Comment.
MALINOWSKI