Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03KATHMANDU2281
2003-11-21 08:06:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL: LUTHERAN WORLD FEDERATION OFFERS TO PROVIDE

Tags:  PREF BH NP 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 002281 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SA/INS, PRM: MPITOTTI AND JLEADER, GENEVA FOR
PLYNCH, LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY, NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/20/2013
TAGS: PREF BH NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: LUTHERAN WORLD FEDERATION OFFERS TO PROVIDE
OVERSIGHT FOR BHUTANESE REFUGEE REPATRIATION

REF: KATHMANDU 2150

Classified By: Ambassador Michael E. Malinowski for Reasons 1.5 (b,d).

--------
Summary
--------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 002281

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SA/INS, PRM: MPITOTTI AND JLEADER, GENEVA FOR
PLYNCH, LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY, NSC FOR MILLARD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/20/2013
TAGS: PREF BH NP
SUBJECT: NEPAL: LUTHERAN WORLD FEDERATION OFFERS TO PROVIDE
OVERSIGHT FOR BHUTANESE REFUGEE REPATRIATION

REF: KATHMANDU 2150

Classified By: Ambassador Michael E. Malinowski for Reasons 1.5 (b,d).

--------------
Summary
--------------


1. (C) A Geneva-based representative of The Lutheran World
Federation, Peter Prove, has suggested that the faith-based
organization could provide third-party monitoring of the
repatriation of Bhutanese refugees from Eastern Nepal to
Bhutan. Prove also advocated that the donor governments hold
an international conference to find a durable solution to the
refugee problem. He worried that the GON would pressure
refugees to return to Bhutan despite their concerns about
conditions of repatriation and was concerned about
radicalization of the refugee population absent clarification
of these conditions. With only three months left until
repatriation begins, Post believes an international
conference, that includes all donor governments, Nepal and
Bhutan, is timely and necessary. End Summary.

-------------- --------------
Lutheran World Federation as Third-Party Monitor?
-------------- --------------


2. (C) On November 20, PolOff met with Peter Prove, Assistant
to the General Secretary for International Affairs and Human
Rights of the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) based in
Geneva. Accompanying Prove was Ratan Gazmere, a Bhutanese
refugee leader and human rights activist. Prove reported
that the Danish Ambassador, in a meeting with the LWF in
Geneva, had suggested that the faith-based organization
consider a role in the oversight of refugee repatriation from
Eastern Nepal to Bhutan. Consequently, LWF decided to send
feelers out to donor governments to determine whether there
is interest in LWF's involvement. Prove commented that LWF
has significant refugee experience. For example, LWF, with
UNHCR, was responsible for the maintenance and repatriation
of refugees in Mozambique and Angola, he said. Prove also
suggested that LWF is uniquely situated to assist with
third-country resettlement because of their presence in many
western countries, including the U.S., Canada and Australia.
However, he said, LWF is somewhat reluctant to pursue the
Danish proposal since reporting back to other governments on

conditions inside Bhutan "would take us out of our comfort
zone."


3. (C) Ratan Gazmere opined that the refugees would feel more
comfortable with LWF acting as international monitor, absent
UNHCR, than some of the other U.N. organizations already
present in Thimpu. Since UNDP and WFP were working in Bhutan
in 1989-1990 when the refugees were expelled, the refugees do
not trust these organizations to look after the refugees'
best interests, he said. (Comment: We have heard similar
concerns expressed by refugees in Khudunabari Camp. End
Comment)

-------------- --------------
International Conference to Find Durable Solution
-------------- --------------


4. (C) Prove also inquired about U.S. interest in an
international conference, a proposal first raised by a group
of NGOs, including LWF and Human Rights Watch, in September,
following their visit to Nepal. The aim of the conference,
he said, would be to bring all parties together to discuss
repatriation to Bhutan and local resettlement in Nepal, as
well as third-country resettlement. Agreeing that such a
conference would need Indian and Bhutanese participation,
Prove believed the USG would provide the strongest leadership
for such an event. He mentioned that a group of Bhutan's
donors were meeting with the Royal Government of Bhutan
(RGOB) in Thimpu to urge it to provide citizenship
unconditionally to Category II refugees, i.e., those who the
RGOB say departed Bhutan voluntarily.

--------------
LWF Concerns: GON Pressure to Repatriate;
Radicalization of Refugees
--------------


5. (C) Both Prove and Gazmere expressed concern that
repatriation of Khudunabari Camp residents in February 2004
would not be fully voluntary. Gazmere reported that the
Government of Nepal (GON) had already begun to verbally
pressure the Bhutanese refugee leadership to agree to return
to Bhutan despite their concerns over conditions there.
Refugee leaders are worried that some might feel compelled to
return to Bhutan because they feel they are not welcome in
Nepal, he said.


6. (C) Prove was also fearful that segments of the refugee
population will resort to more radical measures if neither
the RGOB nor the GON satisfy the refugees' concerns,
particularly over citizenship and property holdings. The
proliferation of "liberation" organizations, including one
self-titled Marxist-Leninist group, supports this fear, he
said. Gazmere concurred that some of the refugees,
particularly the large and idle youth population, have become
increasingly discontented with their current status. Prove
was surprised that the RGOB and Government of India appeared
to be unconcerned with the potentially "explosive" refugee
situation.

--------------
Comment
--------------


7. (C) Post believes it worthwhile to consider The Lutheran
World Federation as a third-party monitor for repatriation.
The organization has significant experience in refugee issues
and is trusted by the refugees themselves. However, because
it is a Christian faith-based organization, the RGOB might
balk at allowing the organization free access to areas
outside Thimpu.


8. (C) Comment Continued: Less than three months remain
before repatriation of Khudunabari Camp residents begins.
However, the majority of the refugees have indicated that
they will not return to Bhutan under existing conditions
(reftel). While donor pressure in Thimpu might help clarify
these conditions, an international conference, as proposed by
NGO advocates, could identify more comprehensive solutions to
the Bhutanese refugee problem. The recommendations of such a
conference would have more weight, of course, if all of
Bhutan's donors participate, including India and the World
Bank. The conference would also need to set a clear
objective -- to find a home for all refugees, whether that be
in Nepal, Bhutan or in third countries. With all parties
accepting responsibility for the refugees' welfare, pressure
on the RGOB would ease and perhaps pave the way for a durable
and lasting solution. End Comment.

MALINOWSKI