Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03HARARE1123
2003-06-03 15:26:00
SECRET
Embassy Harare
Cable title:  

STATE TO PRODUCE SURPRISE WITNESS, JUDGE MAKES

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PINR ASEC ZI 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T HARARE 001123 

SIPDIS

NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR J. FRAZER
LONDON FOR C. GURNEY
PARIS FOR C. NEARY
NAIROBI FOR T. PFLAUMER
BANGKOK FOR WIN DAYTON
DS/OP/AF

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2013
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PINR ASEC ZI
SUBJECT: STATE TO PRODUCE SURPRISE WITNESS, JUDGE MAKES
DIPLOMATIC RULING - TSVANGIRAI TREASON TRIAL WEEK ELEVEN

REF: A. HARARE 1024

B. HARARE 946

C. HARARE 568

D. HARARE 484

E. HARARE 360

F. HARARE 313

G. HARARE 250

Classified By: Political Officer Audu Besmer for reasons 1.5 b/d

Summary:
--------

S E C R E T HARARE 001123

SIPDIS

NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR J. FRAZER
LONDON FOR C. GURNEY
PARIS FOR C. NEARY
NAIROBI FOR T. PFLAUMER
BANGKOK FOR WIN DAYTON
DS/OP/AF

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2013
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PINR ASEC ZI
SUBJECT: STATE TO PRODUCE SURPRISE WITNESS, JUDGE MAKES
DIPLOMATIC RULING - TSVANGIRAI TREASON TRIAL WEEK ELEVEN

REF: A. HARARE 1024

B. HARARE 946

C. HARARE 568

D. HARARE 484

E. HARARE 360

F. HARARE 313

G. HARARE 250

Classified By: Political Officer Audu Besmer for reasons 1.5 b/d

Summary:
--------------


1. (S) Although the Tsvangirai treason trial was brief during
the week of May 27 - 30, possibly in anticipation of the MDC
planned mass action, on May 29, the Deputy Canadian High
Commissioner informed us that according to Ottawa
intelligence sources, the prosecution intended to introduce
"Edward Simms" as a surprise witness in the coming days.
Simms attended the Montreal meeting; the State alleges he is
a CIA agent but has kept other details of his identity
secret. Bringing him forward now suggests the State is more

SIPDIS
desperate to prove its case. Justice Paddington Garwe ruled
that Brigadier Bonyongwe could not be compelled to answer
questions on the operations of the CIO, but should answer
questions on his role in the destruction of the payment
vouchers. End Summary.

Surprise State Witness?
--------------


2. (S) On May 29, the Deputy Canadian High Commissioner
informed us that according to Ottawa intelligence sources,
the prosecution intended to introduce a surprise witness this
week, and Ottawa suspected the witness to be the heretofore
not-clearly-identified "Edward Simms". (Note: According to
the State's star witness Ari Ben Menashe, the leader of the
Montreal meeting depicted on the video tape is "Edward
Simms", an employee of the CIA. The defense has published an
artist's rendering of "Simms" based on the grainy video in an
attempt to identify him. End Note.) By June 2, however, the
State had not produced Simms. (It is also possible that the
State intends another "surprise" unrelated to Simms to
bolster its case.)

Judge Issues Diplomatic Ruling
--------------


3. (U) Also on May 29, Justice Paddington Garwe ruled that
the certificate issued by Nicholas Goche, Minister of State
Security - claiming that information on the operations of the
Central Intelligence Organization was privileged - was valid
(Ref A). Garwe did note, however, that the certificate could
not exempt Brigadier Bonyongwe from answering questions on
his role in the destruction of the payment vouchers. Garwe
did not think that the questions Advocate Bizos asked
Bonyongwe regarding the vouchers would reveal the operations
of the CIO.


4. (C) According to defense attorney Innocent Chagonda,
although Garwe had given the defense team permission to ask
Bonyongwe about the vouchers, some of the questions they
wanted to ask about the payments did pertain to the
operations of the CIO. Chagonda believed it would still be
difficult to ask Bonyongwe questions about the vouchers.

Comment:
--------------


5. (S) The CIA has confirmed that Simms is not an employee.
As such his bona fides are questionable, and it is unclear
what value to the State he would be as a witness. We presume
his arrival was delayed and he still may come in the coming
days. It would appear the State was reluctant to bring him
forward, or he personally did not want to come forward
previously. Either way, that he now may appear suggests the
State is taking more desperate measures to prove its case.
Garwe appears to have made a diplomatic decision on the
certificate issued by Minister Goche to appease both parties
- he upheld it, but also stated that the defense could
proceed with their questioning. End Comment.
SULLIVAN