Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03GUATEMALA1191
2003-05-07 22:15:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Guatemala
Cable title:  

ANOTHER LANDMARK TOPPLED: MACK CONVICTION

Tags:  PHUM PREL PGOV KJUS GT 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS GUATEMALA 001191 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

HARARE FOR BRUCE WHARTON

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV KJUS GT
SUBJECT: ANOTHER LANDMARK TOPPLED: MACK CONVICTION
OVERTURNED

REF: A. 02 GUATEMALA 2605


B. GUATEMALA 1084

UNCLAS GUATEMALA 001191

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

HARARE FOR BRUCE WHARTON

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV KJUS GT
SUBJECT: ANOTHER LANDMARK TOPPLED: MACK CONVICTION
OVERTURNED

REF: A. 02 GUATEMALA 2605


B. GUATEMALA 1084


1. (U) SUMMARY: On May 7, the Fourth Court of Appeals
overturned the Third Sentencing Court's October 3, 2002
conviction of Colonel (ret.) Juan Valencia Osorio (Ref A).
The Fourth Court of Appeals also found Helen Mack's appeal of
the acquittal of General (ret.) Edgar Godoy Gaitan and
Colonel (ret.) Juan Oliva Carerra invalid (Ref B). All three
defendants were released immediately. The Ambassador
attended the appeal and spoke with the press afterward (para
4). Helen Mack intends to appeal to the Supreme Court within
the allotted 15 days. Our public statements on this are
crafted to support the trial process without interfering. End
Summary.


2. (U) The Fourth Court of Appeals released their decision on
the Mack case on May 7, to an overflowing courtroom filled
with family members, human rights advocates, and pro-military
observers. Outside the courtroom, ex-PACS were protesting
and disgruntled would-be observers jostled for position.
When the Ambassador arrived - a sign of the intense US
interest in the case - he was verbally harassed by members of
a tense and partisan crowd as he entered the courtroom.


3. (U) The Fourth Court of Appeals decided that there was a
contradiction in the Third Sentencing Court's October 3, 2002
decision. They said that the Third Court was erroneous in
finding one defendant guilty for a crime that came out of a
chain of command, even though Valencia Osorio admitted that
he transmitted the order to assassinate Myrna Mack.


4. (U) After the release of the decision, the Ambassador told
the press: "We believe this case is of enormous importance
for the Guatemalan system of jurisprudence. We of course
respect the decision of the Guatemalan judiciary. At the
same time, we find it extremely disappointing that, 13 years
after such a barbarous crime, its intellectual authors remain
free."


5. (U) HROff spoke to Helen Mack shortly after the verdict.
She said that she was horribly disappointed that the
Guatemalan justice system had again failed her, and that she
would appeal the Fourth Court's decision to the Supreme Court
immediately. She and her team of lawyers have fifteen days
to formulate their new appeal.


6. (U) COMMENT: We are disappointed that yet another landmark
conviction in a human rights case has been overturned by the
Fourth Court of Appeals (the first being Gerardi, also in
October 2002). We will remain vigilant in our efforts to
protect Helen Mack and her team from threats, and to support
justice for the killing of Myrna Mack.


7. (U) COMMENT CONTINUED: We do not have yet an assessment on
juridical grounds of the latest sentence. Nor do we know yet
what the prospects are of overturning the Appeals Court
verdict. We will pursue both questions with our contacts. The
Embassy will also release a statement along the lines of the
Ambassador's statements (para 4),and we encourage the
Department to do likewise.


8. (SBU) COMMENT CONTINUED: We continue to walk a fine line
on this case: we support Helen Mack's quest for justice, but
we do not want to be perceived as interfering in the judicial
process, which would be counterproductive for the Mack case
and our overall human rights objectives.
HAMILTON