Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03COLOMBO1831
2003-10-22 11:09:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Colombo
Cable title:  

Norwegian envoy briefs donors on status of the

Tags:  PREL PTER PGOV PINS KPAO CE NO LTTE 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 001831 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SA, SA/INS, S/CT, SA/PD; NSC FOR

E. MILLARD

PLEASE ALSO PASS TOPEC

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10-22-13
TAGS: PREL PTER PGOV PINS KPAO CE NO LTTE
SUBJECT: Norwegian envoy briefs donors on status of the
LTTE's counterproposals and possible resumption of talks

Refs: (A) Colombo 1827, and previous
- (B) Oslo 2153 (Notal)

(U) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead.
Reasons 1.5 (b,d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 001831

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SA, SA/INS, S/CT, SA/PD; NSC FOR

E. MILLARD

PLEASE ALSO PASS TOPEC

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10-22-13
TAGS: PREL PTER PGOV PINS KPAO CE NO LTTE
SUBJECT: Norwegian envoy briefs donors on status of the
LTTE's counterproposals and possible resumption of talks

Refs: (A) Colombo 1827, and previous
- (B) Oslo 2153 (Notal)

(U) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead.
Reasons 1.5 (b,d).


1. (C) SUMMARY: Ambassador Lunstead attended a meeting
of major bilateral donors to Sri Lanka on October 21.
Norwegian Ambassador Brattskar briefed the group on the
status of the Tiger's counterproposals developed in
response to the GSL's north/east interim setup proposal.
Brattskar commented that Sri Lanka's political calendar
in the south could make a near-term return to talks a
bit problematic. Brattskar's comments were generally
positive in theme, indicating that the effort to
reinvigorate the peace process was steadily moving
ahead. Para Seven contains the text of a proposed
Mission statement to be made public once the Tigers
announce their counterproposals. END SUMMARY.

--------------
Norwegian Envoy Briefs Donors
--------------


2. (C) Ambassador Lunstead attended a meeting of major
bilateral donors to Sri Lanka on October 21. Briefing
the group, Norwegian Ambassador Hans Brattskar said he
had met with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
political chief S.P. Thamilchelvam upon the latter's
return to Sri Lanka from Europe earlier this week (see
Reftels). Based on understandings reached at this
meeting, Brattskar said he would travel to the LTTE-
controlled town of Kilinochchi in the north on
October 31 to receive the LTTE's counterproposals
developed in response to the GSL's north/east interim
administration proposal made in July. After receiving
the LTTE document, Brattskar said he would return to
Colombo and provide it to the Sri Lankan government.
Interestingly, the Tigers had wanted to provide their
response earlier, but Brattskar had to tell them that he
understood that most key GSL officials would be out of
Colombo at an event in the deep south early next week

and would not be in position to receive it before
October 31. Brattskar confirmed reports that the LTTE
planned to hold a press conference to describe its
counterproposals in Kilinochchi on November 1. The
group also plans to post its response on the pro-LTTE
website "TamilNet."


3. (C) Regarding the substance of the LTTE's
counterproposals, Brattskar said the group seemed to
expect a favorable reaction from the international
community to its document. The Ambassador asked whether
the group understood that simply providing a nicely
worded document was not enough, there had to be changes
in its behavior, e.g., an end to the assassinations of
Tamils, harassment of Muslims, etc. Brattskar confided
that he did not know if they understood that point, but
the GoN consistently urged the group to change its
behavior.

--------------
Problems in Scheduling Talks
--------------


4. (C) Turning to a possible resumption of GSL-LTTE
talks, Brattskar said the Tigers had made clear to him
that they were willing to return to the negotiations,
which they pulled out of in April. There were practical
difficulties in scheduling a full round of talks,
however. With the annual budget debate in Parliament
coming up and indications that the opposition planned to
press the GSL at every opportunity in coming weeks, the
government was going to have its hands full in November-
December. In light of that, it might be hard to
schedule a full round of talks in that timeframe.
Brattskar added that a shorter round of talks lasting
perhaps 2-3 days and focusing more on procedural issues
might be possible.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


5. (C) Brattskar's comments largely tracked with those
that Norwegian Special Envoy Erik Solheim made to
Embassy Oslo in Ref B. Like Solheim, Brattskar seemed
generally positive about the current situation,
indicating that the effort to reinvigorate the peace
process was steadily moving ahead. He seemed convinced
that the Tigers were fully committed to returning to
negotiations and, based on the group's recent public
remarks, that does appear to be the case. That said,
the apparent difficulty in scheduling talks due to the
presentation of the budget and the expected cohabitation
jousting flowing from that event is potentially a new
fly in the ointment. While the situation in the south
will be politically combative, however, we do not think
it will so fully absorb the GSL's attention that
substantive talks would have to be delayed for too long.
END COMMENT.

--------------
Suggested Press Statement
--------------


6. (SBU) During the meeting, Ambassador was told that
the EU's local mission plans to issue a statement once
the Tigers' counterproposals are made public. The EU
said its statement would be short and generic, and would
not comment directly on the content of the
counterproposals.


7. (SBU) We also think it would be appropriate for
Mission to issue a short press statement after the
LTTE's counterproposals are out. As with the EU
mission's statement, we do not propose commenting on the
details of the LTTE's document. Our statement would be
along the following general lines:

BEGIN TEXT:

"The LTTE's delivery of counterproposals made in
response to the Sri Lankan government's interim
administration proposal for the North and East is a
constructive step. We urge that both parties build on
this step by resuming negotiations in a timely manner.
With a constructive approach and willingness to
compromise, we continue to believe that a negotiated
solution to the conflict is possible. We salute the
Norwegian government for its ongoing facilitation
effort."

END TEXT.


8. (U) Minimize considered.

LUNSTEAD