Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ANKARA2056
2003-03-28 16:38:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

LEYLA ZANA RETRIAL OPENS; COURT DENIES RELEASE

Tags:  PGOV PREL PHUM TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002056 

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/28/2008
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: LEYLA ZANA RETRIAL OPENS; COURT DENIES RELEASE
REQUEST

REF: A. ANKARA 1578

B. ANKARA 1362

C. 02 ANKARA 8881

D. 02 ANKARA 6116


Classified by Acting Political Counselor Nicholas S. Kass.
Reasons: 1.5(b)(d).


C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002056

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/28/2008
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: LEYLA ZANA RETRIAL OPENS; COURT DENIES RELEASE
REQUEST

REF: A. ANKARA 1578

B. ANKARA 1362

C. 02 ANKARA 8881

D. 02 ANKARA 6116


Classified by Acting Political Counselor Nicholas S. Kass.
Reasons: 1.5(b)(d).



1. (C) Summary: The historic retrial of Leyla Zana and three
other Kurdish former M.P.s began March 28 under tight
security. The court ruled against releasing the defendants
pending the outcome of the trial and rejected a defense
petition seeking a new chief judge. Turkish and
international human rights advocates and foreign diplomats
attended the packed hearing. The next session will be held
April 25. End Summary.


--------------
Packed Hearing
--------------



2. (U) The retrial of Leyla Zana, Hatip Dicle, Orhan Dogan,
and Selim Sadak -- former Members of Parliament from the
pro-Kurdish Democracy Party (DEP -- since banned) -- began
under tight security March 28 in an Ankara State Security
Court. The retrial is the first granted under a recent
EU-related reform measure allowing for retrial in a Turkish
court pursuant to rulings of the European Court of Human
Rights (ECHR -reftel B). The former M.P.s were convicted, in
a controversial 1994 trial, of membership in an illegal
organization (the PKK).



3. (U) The courtroom was filled to capacity; in addition to
two Emboffs, the audience included: numerous relatives of the
defendants; Turkish and international Kurdish/human rights
advocates; diplomats from Germany, Denmark, and the EU; and
the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Parliamentary Human
Rights Committee. Lead defense attorney Yusuf Alatas told
Poloff more than 300 attorneys had asked to participate in
the case, but he accepted only 25 in order to reduce tensions
in the courtroom and allow more space for observers. (Note:
High-profile cases in Turkey often include 100 or more
lawyers, though all but a few are glorified spectators. End
Note.) There was a heavy police and military presence inside
and outside the courtroom, but no visible tensions.


--------------
Ruling: Defendants Stay Behind Bars
--------------



4. (U) The three-judge court ruled unanimously against a
motion asking that the defendants be released pending the
outcome of the trial. The court also unanimously rejected
defense petitions asking for the replacement of the court's
Chief Judge on the grounds that he had voted against granting
the retrial and was therefore not impartial. All four
defendants gave lengthy opening statements. Dicle argued
that the remarks for which he was convicted had subsequently
been mirrored in comments by State officials -- and thus
decriminalized -- during his incarceration. "We have
already been in jail longer than any political prisoners in
Turkish history," Dicle charged.



5. (U) The court set April 25 as the date of the next
hearing. It also ordered that travel funds be made available
to enable out-of-town witnesses to attend, and that civil
servant witnesses be excused from work in order to testify.




--------------
COMMENT
--------------



6. (C) This trial will be closely watched -- particularly by
EU observers looking to test the sincerity of GOT human
rights reforms. The court's refusal to release the
defendants or appoint a new chief judge does not bode well
for an acquittal. At the same time, the GOT is reeling from
the recent ECHR ruling that jailed PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan
did not receive a fair trial (Reftel A),and is under
pressure to be on its best behavior in this case. At a time
when Turkey appears to be alienating its foreign friends left
and right, the GOT can ill afford a perception of juridical
legerdemain.
PEARSON