Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03ANKARA1578
2003-03-12 17:13:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

ECHR RULING: OCALAN TRIAL UNFAIR, PRISON

Tags:  PGOV PREL PHUM TU OSCE PKK 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 001578 

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/12/2008
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU OSCE PKK
SUBJECT: ECHR RULING: OCALAN TRIAL UNFAIR, PRISON
CONDITIONS ACCEPTABLE


REF: A. ANKARA 1303

B. ANKARA 972

C. ADANA 44

D. 02 ANKARA 8881


Classified by Polcouns John Kunstadter; reasons 1.5 b and d.


C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 001578

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/12/2008
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU OSCE PKK
SUBJECT: ECHR RULING: OCALAN TRIAL UNFAIR, PRISON
CONDITIONS ACCEPTABLE


REF: A. ANKARA 1303

B. ANKARA 972

C. ADANA 44

D. 02 ANKARA 8881


Classified by Polcouns John Kunstadter; reasons 1.5 b and d.



1. (C) Summary: The European Court of Human Rights ruled that
jailed PKK leader Ocalan did not receive a fair trial, while
also determining that his prison conditions are acceptable.
Both the GOT and Ocalan's attorneys plan to appeal the
ruling. Regardless of the outcome of the appeal, Ocalan will
not be eligible for a re-trial. The ruling is consistent
with longstanding U.S. and European criticisms of Turkey's
State Security Court system, where Ocalan was tried. End
Summary.



2. (U) The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) March 12
issued its decision in a case filed against the GOT on behalf
of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who was arrested in 1999 and
is now held in a special prison on Imrali Island in the Sea
of Marmara. Ocalan was convicted and sentenced to death, but
his sentence was commuted to life in prison after the GOT in
August abolished the death penalty during peacetime. The
ECHR found the GOT in violation of certain articles of the
Council of Europe's Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, while rejecting the
applicant's claims regarding other articles. The ECHR
awarded Ocalan 100,000 Euros.


--------------
Violations:
--------------



3. (U) The court found the following violations:


-- Applicant was not tried before an independent and
impartial tribunal and was not given a fair trial (Article
6.1).
-- Applicant was sentenced to death following an unfair trial
(Article 3).
-- Applicant was not brought promptly before a judge (Article
5.3).
-- Applicant's detention was not quickly reviewed by a judge
(Article 5.4).


--------------
Non-Violations:
--------------



4. (U) The court found the following non-violations:


-- The circumstances of applicant's transfer to Turkey and
detention conditions were not unlawful (Article 3).

-- Applicant's arrest and detention were not unlawful
(Article 5.1).
-- Applicant's right to life and protection from ill
treatment had not been violated (Articles 2 and 3).


--------------
GOT, Defense Will Appeal
--------------



5. (U) The MFA issued a terse statement promising an appeal
to a higher ECHR board. Kaan Esener, head of the MFA Council
of Europe Department, told Poloff he was surprised and
disappointed by the ruling, particularly the court's
determination that the Ankara State Security Court (SSC)
where Ocalan was tried had not been independent and
impartial. (Note: SSCs are special courts that handle crimes
such as terrorism, drug smuggling, and threats to the State.
They are permitted to hold closed hearings and admit
testimony obtained during police interrogation in the absence
of counsel. End Note). Esener said the GOT has three months
to prepare an appeal to a higher ECHR body, which will render
a final decision. He said he was concerned that Ocalan's
supporters might use the ruling to stir trouble. Ocalan
attorney Aysel Tugluk told Emboff she welcomed the ECHR's
determination that the trial was unfair. But she argued the
court should have determined that Ocalan's arrest and
transfer to Turkey violated extradition rules and constituted
a kidnapping. She also said Ocalan's sentence violated his
right to life, regardless of the subsequent abolition of the
death penalty. She said the defense will file an appeal.
Ahmet Turan Demir, chairman of the pro-Kurdish HADEP Party,
said the verdict presents a chance for the GOT to review its
judiciary system and improve its relations with the Kurdish
community.



6. (C) Regardless of the outcome of the appeal, Ocalan will
not be eligible for a retrial. As reported Reftel D, recent
GOT reforms allowing for retrial pursuant to ECHR rulings
were carefully designed to leave out Ocalan.


-------------- --------------
Detention and Trial Flawed, Prison Conditions Lawful
-------------- --------------



7. (U) The seven-judge ECHR panel criticized the GOT for
initially including a military judge on the three-judge SSC
that tried Ocalan. The SSC replaced the military judge with
a civilian early in the trial, but the ECHR determined that
measure inadequate. (Note: The lone Turk on the panel filed
a partially dissenting opinion defending the SSC. End
Note.). The court also determined the GOT had improperly
denied Ocalan access to an attorney while he was held in
police custody from February 16-23, 1999, during which time
Ocalan made several incriminating statements. Authorities
improperly held Ocalan for seven days before bringing him
before a judge. Subsequent attorney visits were held in the
presence of members of the security forces. After the first
two visits, Ocalan's contact with attorneys was limited to
two hours per week. Prison authorities prevented attorneys
from providing Ocalan with certain legal documents.



8. (U) On the other hand, the court determined that Ocalan's
prison conditions do not constitute inhuman or degrading
treatment. Ocalan is the sole prisoner held on Imrali
Island. Kurdish activists argue that the GOT is isolating
him inhumanely and have demanded he be transferred to a
mainland prison. Jandarma officials prevented attorneys and
relatives from visiting Ocalan, supposedly due to stormy
weather (reftels),for a three-and-a-half-month period ending
March 12, drawing angry protests. The court also ruled that
the conditions of Ocalan's arrest and transfer from Kenya to
Turkey were not unduly humiliating.


--------------
COMMENT
--------------



9. (C) This ruling should come as no surprise to the GOT, as
U.S. and European observers have long argued that the SSC
system sacrifices individual rights to the interests of the
State. The most serious SSC abuses are not in legitimate
terrorist cases like Ocalan's, but rather in the numerous
cases brought against human rights workers, Kurdish rights
advocates, journalists, and others charged with threatening
the State for expressing their views. There is talk in
Parliament about introducing a bill that would drastically
reform the SSCs. The GOT could significantly improve its
human rights record, and bring Turkey closer to EU
membership, by re-making the SSCs into a legitimate forum for
trying terrorists and dangerous criminals, rather than a tool
for silencing dissent.


PEARSON