Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03AMMAN3549
2003-06-16 08:05:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

EMBASSY AMMAN INPUT: 2003 REPORT ON INVESTMENT

Tags:  EINV EFIN PGOV KIDE JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

160805Z Jun 03
UNCLAS AMMAN 003549 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

TREASURY FOR DO/CHRISTOPOULOS
USDOC FOR ITA/TAYLOR
USTR FOR FHUEGEL
OPIC FOR O'SULLIVAN
L/CID/GLEHNER
EB/IFD/OIA/NEFIRD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV EFIN PGOV KIDE JO
SUBJECT: EMBASSY AMMAN INPUT: 2003 REPORT ON INVESTMENT
DISPUTES AND EXPROPRIATION CLAIMS

REF: STATE 83098

SENSITIVE, BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY

UNCLAS AMMAN 003549

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

TREASURY FOR DO/CHRISTOPOULOS
USDOC FOR ITA/TAYLOR
USTR FOR FHUEGEL
OPIC FOR O'SULLIVAN
L/CID/GLEHNER
EB/IFD/OIA/NEFIRD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV EFIN PGOV KIDE JO
SUBJECT: EMBASSY AMMAN INPUT: 2003 REPORT ON INVESTMENT
DISPUTES AND EXPROPRIATION CLAIMS

REF: STATE 83098

SENSITIVE, BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Embassy Amman submits the following case
for bureau consideration. Per instructions REFTEL, post
notes that the case involves a U.S. company that purchased a
non-U.S. company with an outstanding claim. END SUMMARY

--------------
CASE DESCRIPTION
--------------


2. (SBU) Claimant A is an American company that acquired a
UK-based engineering and design company in 2001. The UK
company had been hired by Claimant B (52% owned by the GOJ)
in 1995 and in 1997 to design and supervise the construction
of three earthen dikes, designated Dike A, Dike B, and Dike
C, for Claimant B. In March, 2000, a large portion of Dike B
collapsed, a collapse that Claimant A attributed to factors
unrelated to the dike's design. As a consequence of the
collapse, Claimant B asked Claimant A to investigate the
safety of Dike A in March, 2001. In the course of its
investigation, Claimant A discovered unacceptably strains on
the dike and put in place urgent remedial measures to keep
the dike safe pending a longer-term strategy for restoring
the dike to normal operation. Claimant A requested payment
of GBP90,000 ($55000) from Claimant B for the remedial work.
Claimant B asserted that any payment to Claimant A was offset
by damages of JD37 million ($26 million) for the collapse of
Dike B.

--------------
STATUS OF DISPUTE
--------------


3. (SBU) Claimant A, citing the British-Jordanian Bilateral
Investment Treaty, registered its dispute with the Jordanian
Government (as majority owner of Claimant B) with the
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
(ICSID) in September, 2002 for arbitration. The Jordanian
Government said that Claimant B is a commercial business
rather than a government entity and that, as such, the
dispute does not involve the GOJ and thus is not a matter for
ICSID consideration. An ICSID tribunal has been constituted,
and ICSID will decide whether it has jurisdiction after a
hearing set for February 3, 2004.


4. (SBU) Claimant B initiated proceedings against Claimant A
in the Jordanian Court of First Instance in November, 2002,
claiming the damages cited above. Claimant A challenged the
jurisdiction of Jordanian courts in the dispute and said
that, given ICSID acceptance of the case, current Jordanian
court proceedings should be discontinued. The Jordanian
Court is expected to issue a ruling o/a June 12.

--------------
IDENTITY OF CLAIMANTS
--------------


5. (SBU) Claimant A is U.S.-based Jacobs Engineering.
Claimant B is the Arab Potash Corporation (APC).
GNEHM