Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03AMMAN268
2003-01-14 09:54:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

SESAME--A VIRTUAL REALITY

Tags:  TSPL TPHY TBIO KSCA EAID SENV JO MEPN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 AMMAN 000268

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

PARIS PASS UNESCO OBSERVER AGGELER
VIENNA FOR GOLDMAN
STATE FOR NEA/RA LAWSON, NEA/ARN ZIADEH, OES/PCI PAYNE
TEL AVIV FOR GUMBINER
CAIRO FOR CRETZ

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPL TPHY TBIO KSCA EAID SENV JO MEPN
SUBJECT: SESAME--A VIRTUAL REALITY


(SBU) SUMMARY: The most significant development of the
January 5-6 SESAME Interim Council Meeting in Amman was the
announcement that seven countries officially requested
membership in the organization, thus meeting the statutory
requirement for official establishment of the SESAME
project. King Abdullah and UNESCO DG Matsuura led a
"virtual" groundbreaking ceremony at the site of the
proposed synchrotron facility. Member state contributions
and finances continued to dominate the debate and remain a
sticking point for forward progress and
self-sustainability. The hardest blow, though downplayed
by SESAME Chair Schopper, was a less than favorable
EU-commissioned review of SESAME and the EU's subsequent
decision not to provide several million dollars in
funding. IAEA Deputy DG Burkart also made it clear that
his organization would only provide occasional training
opportunities and that SESAME's greatest challenge lies in
identifying means to sustain itself. Two Israeli
representatives attended under heavy security but were not
lightening rods for "political" remarks. On the horizon,
and something likely to stir debate within the SESAME
community, is Libya's recent request for observer status.
END SUMMARY.

--------------
A VIRTUAL GROUNDBREAKING
--------------

(SBU) The 9 th meeting of the International Interim Council
of SESAME (Synchrotron Light for Experimental Science and
Applications in the Middle East),convened in Amman January
5-6, was a mixed bag of positive and discouraging
developments. On the bright side, SESAME Chairman Herwig
Schopper had received in December a request from Egypt to
officially become a member of the organization, bringing
the total number of official member states to six and
meeting the statutory requirement for the SESAME project to
be officially launched. The six are Bahrain, Egypt, Iran,
Jordan, Palestinian Authority, and Turkey. We also learned
at the meeting that Israel had days earlier sent a

"conditional" letter of membership, pending clarification
of the contentious member contributions issue. On the
margins of the meeting, the Egyptian delegates proudly
talked of how Egypt had "tipped the scales" and brought
SESAME to fruition. By the second day of the proceedings,
and following the "groundbreaking" ceremony at which King
Abdullah decorated Schopper and UNESCO DG Koichiro
Matsuura, Schopper dropped the word "interim" from the
council and declared SESAME officially established.
Needless to say, the Jordanian government has yet to award
the contract for the construction of the facility and
digging will likely not begin for another several months.

--------------
IN FOR A PENNY, IN FOR A POUND
--------------

(SBU) Still dogging the project, however, is its ability to
become self-sustaining. With member states continuing to
drag their feet on contributions, SESAME has few operating
funds, let alone sufficient finances for necessary start up
activities, such as upgrading the Bessy I synchrotron to
the appropriate power and obtaining the necessary beamlines
to conduct its work. Despite the fact that annual
contributions were set at a seemingly paltry $50,000 per
member, it has not encouraged a rush to financially support
SESAME. In fact, UNESCO Director of Basic and Engineering
Sciences and SESAME Secretary Maciej Nalecz announced at
the meeting that only Greece and the United Arab Emirates
are in good standing, vis-a-vis contributions, calling this
development "disturbing." The estimated 2003 budget is
only $100,000 larger than 2002, coming in at $710,000. One
of the Israeli participants confided to us that, although
SESAME leadership optimistically believes $3-5 million is
necessary for annual operating costs, other experts in
synchrotron light science agree that the figure is closer
to $10-15 million.

(SBU) Nalecz spoke passionately of the importance of making
SESAME financially independent. He urged member states to
make their contributions in a timely manner and to become
stakeholders in the project. Self-sustainability is vital
to SESAME's identity, Nalecz added. He also underscored
that UNESCO would play the role of catalyst, and should not
be viewed as an administrator or financier of SESAME.
UNESCO has "no budget associated with SESAME." "We want to
make very clear UNESCO will assist with networking and help
with fellowships and training," Nalecz committed. Schopper
chimed in with an appeal to observer states, singling out
the U.S., to continue their financial support of SESAME.

(SBU) Throughout the two-day meeting, and as in previous
years, debate surrounded the question of how to determine
member states' financial contributions. Some favored
basing annual contributions on a UN-type scale; others yet
expressed their desire to revisit systems based on GDP, per
capita GDP, or user community (i.e. potential number of
scientists in-country),or a combination thereof. At the
end of the day, it became increasingly clear that whatever
system is chosen it would need to identify some upper
limit; otherwise, all member states would be reluctant to
make such an open-ended financial commitment to SESAME,
fearing a spiraling of start-up and operating costs over
the years.

--------------
EU FUNDING NIXED
--------------

(SBU) The most crushing recent blow to SESAME was the
announcement at the meeting that the EU, long expected to
pony up about $8 million to the project, had concluded
through a techno-economic feasibility study of SESAME,
commissioned by the EU, not to provide funding. Anthony
Cary, Chef de Cabinet of Commissioner Patten, wrote
Schopper on October 22, "In view of the substantial
clarifications and revisions needed, and in the absence of
firm commitments of the members of SESAME, I regret to
inform you that at this stage the Commission is not in a
position to provide Community funding for SESAME." "The
final report makes a number of recommendations for
improving of the scientific and technical analysis, for
revising estimates of the likely start-up and running costs
of SESAME, and for more rigorous scientific and
administrative management of the project," Cary added. The
EU, which normally sends an observer delegate to SESAME,
was conspicuously absent from this meeting.

(SBU) Schopper, eager to downplay the EU decision and to
paint as promising a future picture as possible,
continuously expressed his view that the door to EU money
remained open, pending SESAME meeting the "conditions"
outlined in the evaluation. He called the evaluation "in
principle, a very positive recommendation," adding that he
didn't think the review panel fully understood the
political goals of SESAME. During remarks given at the
"groundbreaking," Schopper's persistent hope of securing EU
money raised no small number of eyebrows among the
assembled SESAME participants. These individuals were
decidedly less optimistic, not publicly airing their views
but sharing their concerns with one another in discussions
on the margins.

--------------
IAEA DAMPENS SESAME HOPES ALSO
--------------

(SBU) IAEA Deputy DG Burkart delivered a sobering wakeup
call to SESAME participants when he, on the one hand,
offered his agency's moral support and congratulations on
the official establishment of SESAME, but clarified that
the IAEA was "not into basic research" and counseled the
SESAME Council to make the project self-sustaining.
Burkart offered IAEA as an institution that would continue
to help by contributing to training of SESAME staff;
however, general funding for the project was not in the
offing.

--------------
TRAINEES MIA--A BIRD IN THE HAND . . .
--------------

(SBU) Yet another disappointment was the report of the
Training Committee, during which the assembled SESAME
participants learned that of the 21 individuals identified
for staff positions at the new facility, and who had been
sent to various synchrotron facilities worldwide for
training, only five remain. The rest have jumped ship and
have been absorbed into existing synchrotron communities.
Addressing the retention problem, the Iranian delegate (and
Training Committee Chair) intimated that the lack of a
clear future and timeline for SESAME probably contributed
to these trainees accepting positions with other facilities
and academic institutions. Twelve U.S.-bound trainees were
among the SESAME prospective employees who bolted.

--------------
ISRAELIS WELCOMED
--------------

(SBU) On a positive note, the two Israeli representatives
made it to this meeting, albeit under heavy security
provided by the Jordanian hosts. They participated fully
and were generally openly welcomed by their Arab
counterparts at the SESAME proceedings. When queried, one
of the Israelis shared with us that they maintain excellent
relations with most of the other representatives, but added
that the Egyptian delegation could be difficult and cold.
He further confided, "Some of our best collaboration is
with the Palestinians and Iranians."

(SBU) Talking of Schopper's December visit to Israel,
during which he addressed a distinguished gathering of the
country's leading scientists in all fields on SESAME, the
Israeli delegate said that there was significant opposition
to the project. When Schopper attempted to defend SESAME
by claiming the scientific research associated with it was
strictly for peaceful purposes, he was challenged about the
wisdom of building Arab capacity in a field that could have
dual-uses. Specifically, the Israeli representative told
us that several leading Israeli scientists charged that
SESAME was "educating the next generation of terrorists."

--------------
IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS
--------------

(SBU) Stanford University's Herman Winick reported that his
institution is dismantling a synchrotron and equipment from
that machine on the order of $1 million will be available
for SESAME. He is working to secure the necessary export
licenses from Departments of Energy and Commerce, but
sought assistance with shipping costs. A possible solution
that was discussed would be to take some of the $50,000
contribution from DOE, scheduled for April 2003, and
negotiate language to use some of these funds to ship the
component from Stanford to Jordan.

(SBU) According to Schopper, the American Physical Society
was to approach DOE to solicit a financial contribution for
the beamlines; however, this was apparently dependent upon
a positive outcome of the EU evaluation and the formal
establishment of SESAME, which was announced on January 6.
It is now unclear if DOE would be willing to help fund the
beamlines, as the EU review prompted a negative response
from Brussels to assist SESAME.

(SBU) The French observer announced that France is closing
down a synchrotron facility in Paris in the immediate
future, and that surplus equipment--especially
beamlines--would likely be available for SESAME. He
counseled that SESAME should immediately identify the
equipment it needs and petition the French government.

(SBU) Brazil offered three fellowships, one each to the
Palestinian Authority, Jordan, and Israel, for scientists
to spend a year at the Brazilian light source.

--------------
COMMENT: NOT AS EASY AS "OPEN SESAME"
--------------

(SBU) The SESAME project has a long and uphill road to
conquer before it becomes a viable, self-sustaining entity,
and a regional "center of excellence." Simply breaking
ground on the new building, and even garnering the
necessary six members to formally initiate the project,
does not a regional synchrotron facility make. Overcoming
the financial obstacles (both start-up as well as running
costs),building and training the staff, defining the users
community, soliciting scientific proposals for SESAME, all
add up to a heavy workload. In Schopper's own words, "the
preparatory tasks seem modest compared with the challenges
ahead."

GNEHM