Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
03AMMAN1667
2003-03-19 15:13:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION ON IRAQ

Tags:  KMDR JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 001667

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NEA/ARN, NEA/PA, NEA/AIA, INR/NESA, R/MR,
I/GNEA, B/BXN, B/BRN, NEA/PPD, NEA/IPA FOR ALTERMAN
USAID/ANE/MEA
LONDON FOR GOLDRICH
PARIS FOR O'FRIEL

E.O. 12958: N/A

TAGS: KMDR JO
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION ON IRAQ


Summary

-- Lead story in all papers today, March 19,
highlights under banner headlines reported remarks by
the White House spokesperson that "Washington will
enter Iraq even if Saddam leaves". Major stories
focus on developments related to the war on Iraq,
including the Iraqi President's rejection of the U.S.
ultimatum.

Editorial Commentary

-- "War against the United Nations"

Daily columnist Rakan Majali writes on the back page
of center-left, influential Arabic daily Al-Dustour
(03/19): "Some analysts make the point that the major
effect of the war will be to put an end to the old
world order that has prevailed since the second world
war and that brought forth the United Nations and also
achieved a status of international equalization
particularly between the two superpowers, the United
States and the Soviet Union.. The U.S. invasion of
Iraq will, in effect, mean the end of the United
Nations, because, according to the United States, the
organization has exhausted its purposes and the world
order that existed since the second world war needs to
be replaced by a new world order, which has previously
been declared by the United States following the
collapse of the Soviet Union. What the United States
seeks to do today is to move from the declaration
phase to the implementation phase of this new world
order, thereby reflecting a specific status quo,
namely the presence of a single superpower that
controls the world's capabilities."

-- "A quiet discussion about the option of stepping
down"

Daily columnist Bater Wardam writes on the op-ed page
of center-left, influential Arabic daily Al-Dustour
(03/19): "The American-British camp is ready to
launch war and there are no positive indications of
any move towards finding a solution that protects the
Iraqi people from the American aggression any other
movement. Bush's ultimatum to the Iraqi President and
his family to leave or face war is nothing but a
political maneuver to attempt to put the ball in the
Iraqi court and hold the Iraqi President responsible
for starting the war.. The Iraqi President will not
leave and there is nothing in his history or his
mentality that would suggest that. Moreover, most
countries reject this idea because it opens the door
to chaos in international relations. Washington would
start building up its forces around every country
whose policies it does not approve of and then require
changing the regime by the threat of power. This
would be utter nonsense."

-- "The imminent Iraqi attack"

Daily columnist Fahd Fanek writes on the back page of
semi-official, influential Arabic daily Al-Rai
(03/19): "The world has not witnessed such a blatant
aggression since the days of the Moguls. In the name
of eliminating alleged weapons of mass destruction,
America is going to use weapons of mass destruction;
and on the pretext of implementing Security Council
resolutions, America bypasses the Security Council,
which does not want war. And on the pretext of
protecting Iraq's neighbors, America threatens those
same neighbors if they fail to provide facilities for
the aggression; and under the pretext of saving the
Iraqi people, three thousand bombs will fall on Iraqi
cities in the first few hours of the war. The
president of the most democratic country in the world
allowed himself to deliver a fiery speech asking the
president of another sovereign country to abandon his
country within 48 hours. How can this happen in the
twenty-first century? Why has America become a
country that undermines international law, ignores
world public opinion, and wages a destructive war
without provocation? U.S. President Bush's address
will go down in history along with speeches by Hitler,
Stalin and all other dictators who love war and
understand nothing but the language of force, threats,
invasions and destruction."

-- "The war is not the end"
Daily columnist Tarek Masarweh writes on the back page
of semi-official, influential Arabic daily Al-Rai
(03/19): "In his address, President Bush asked the
Iraqi President to leave his country within 48 hours
in order to avoid war and is asking the Iraqi army not
to fight. The American President is asking the Iraqis
to open up their cities and villages to the American
occupation army. Is there any worse contempt, not
only for the Iraqis, but also for the people of the
world? To think that a people might welcome an
occupation may apply in a different country, but it
cannot happen in a country that fought for eight
years, suffered a siege for twelve years and resisted
all forms of American operations.. The declaration of
war is not the end to the Iraqi issue. It is just the
beginning."
GNEHM