Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02ROME894
2002-02-22 10:51:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES FOR 2001

Tags:  PHUM PREL ELAB KSPR IT HUMAN RIGHTS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 000894 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

FOR DRL, EUR, AND PA


E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL ELAB KSPR IT HUMAN RIGHTS
SUBJECT: COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES FOR 2001
- REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE

REF: A. STATE 28413

B. 01 STATE 185194

SUMMARY
-------
UNCLAS ROME 000894

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

FOR DRL, EUR, AND PA


E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL ELAB KSPR IT HUMAN RIGHTS
SUBJECT: COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES FOR 2001
- REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE

REF: A. STATE 28413

B. 01 STATE 185194

SUMMARY
--------------

1. (SBU) SEVERAL POINTS IN THE ITALY CHAPTER OF THE 2001
COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES (HRR) REPRESENT
DEPARTURES FROM PREVIOUS PRACTICE. ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE
NATURE OF SOME OF THE CHANGES, WHICH MAY BE PERCEIVED AS
SIGNIFICANT IN THE CONTEXT OF DOMESTIC ITALIAN POLITICS, WE
EXPECT TO RECEIVE INQUIRIES FROM EITHER GOI INTERLOCUTORS OR
THE PRESS. THIS MESSAGE REQUESTS DEPT GUIDANCE WE CAN USE IN
RESPONDING TO SOME OF THE INQUIRIES THESE CHANGES MAY PROMPT.
WE WOULD ENCOURAGE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF WAYS WE CAN MAKE
CLEAR THAT, DESPITE THE CHANGES INSERTED INTO THIS YEAR'S
REPORT, WE ARE NOT TAKING SIDES IN ITALY'S LOUD AND
ACRIMONIOUS POLITICAL DEBATE BETWEEN THE CENTER-LEFT AND
CENTER-RIGHT PARTIES.

THE GOI "GENERALLY" RESPECTS CERTAIN HUMAN RIGHTS
-------------- --------------

2. (SBU) Q: WE NOTE THAT THE BERLUSCONI GOVERNMENT'S HUMAN
RIGHTS PERFORMANCE SCORES LOWER (IN THE 2001 HRR) THAN DID
PREDECESSOR CENTER-LEFT GOVERNMENTS. FOR EXAMPLE, YOU SAY
THE BERLUSCONI GOVERNMENT ONLY "GENERALLY" RESPECTED THE
JUDICIARY'S INDEPENDENCE (SECTION 1.E),FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND
THE PRESS (SECTION 2.A),AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (SECTION 2.C).
YOU ALSO NOTE THAT HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS, UNDER BERLUSCONI,
"IN GENERAL" OPERATE WITHOUT GOVERNMENT RESTRICTION (SECTION
4). PREVIOUS HRRS SAID THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT "RESPECTS
(THESE RIGHTS) IN PRACTICE." DOES THIS MEAN THE USG
PERCEIVES DETERIORATING RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS BY ITALY'S
CENTER-RIGHT GOVERNMENT?


3. (SBU) POST COMMENT: IN YOUR RESPONSE, PLEASE ACCOUNT FOR
ANOMALOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE 2001 HRR THAT GIVE THE GOI A
CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH (E.G., SECTION 2.A ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM,
SECTION 6.A ON THE RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION, SECTION 6.B ON THE
RIGHT TO ORGANIZE AND BARGAIN COLLECTIVELY).

WHAT DOES "GENERALLY RESPECTS" MEAN?
--------------

4. (SBU) POST BACKGROUND COMMENT: PER REF B, DEPT ADVISED
THAT "THE PHRASE 'GENERALLY RESPECTS' IS USED...BECAUSE THE
PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IS A SITUATION THAT
IS CONSTANTLY CHANGING AND EVOLVING, AND IT CANNOT ACCURATELY
BE STATED THAT ANY GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES,

FULLY PROTECTS THESE RIGHTS WITHOUT QUALIFICATION IN EVEN THE
BEST OF CIRCUMSTANCES." IN USING THIS LANGUAGE TO EXLAIN
THE MEANING OF "GENERALLY RESPECTS," IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
HAVE RESPONSES TO FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS SUCH AS:

-- Q: THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF "GENERALLY" IS "ON THE
WHOLE," "AS A RULE," "IN MOST (BUT NOT ALL) INSTANCES." SO,
WHAT ARE THE INSTANCES IN 2001 ON WHICH THE BERLUSCONI
GOVERNMENT DIDN'T RESPECT THE JUDICIARY'S INDEPENDENCE (OR
"FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE PRESS" OR "RELIGIOUS REEDOM")?
-- Q: THE HRR HAS MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN
SOME AREAS (E.G., SECTION 1.C ON SECURITY FORCE MISTREATMENT
OF ANTI-GLOBALIZATION DEMONSTRATORS IN NAPLES AND GENOA) BUT
NONE IN THESE (I.E., PARA 2 ABOVE). COULD YOU PLEASE GIVE US
SOME SPECIFIC INSTANCES IN 2001 WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH
(PRESS/RELIGION/ETC.) WAS VIOLATED?

-- Q: THE 2000 HRR REPORTS ON FRANCE AND GERMANY SAY THEY
"GENERALLY" RESPECT FREEDOM OFRELIGION. BUT THESE REPORTS
REFER TO PROBLEMS SUCH AS CLOTHING BANS IN SCHOOLS (THAT
AFFECT MUSLIMS),LIMITATIONS ON RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER, AND
MEASURES DIRECTED AGAINST "SECTS," ESPECIALLY SCIENTOLOGY AND
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES. AS THE REPORT ON ITALY DOESN'T MENTION
SIMILAR LIMITATIONS, WHY IS THE SAME LANGUAGE USED TO
DESCRIBE APPARENTLY DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CONDITIONS?

INTERNAL INCONSISTENCY?
--------------

5. (SBU) Q: WE NOTE THAT IN ONE PLACE (SECTION 1.E) THE
REPORT SAYS THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES FOR AN INDEPENDENT
JUDICIARY AND THE GOVERNMENT "GENERALLY RESPECTS" THIS
PROVISION. IN ANOTHER PLACE (INTRODUCTION) THE REPORT SAYS
THE GOVERNMENT "RESPECTS" THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR AN
INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY. THESE SENTENCES APPEAR TO SAY TWO
DIFFERENT THINGS. IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S VIEW, DOES THE
BERLUSCONI GOVERNMENT "RESPECT" AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY OR
NOT?

ARBITRARY OR UNLAWFUL DEPRIVATION OF LIFE
--------------

6. (SBU) Q: SECTION 1.A IS HEADED, "ARBITRARY OR UNLAWFUL
DEPRIVATION OF LIFE." ONE PARAGRAPH IN THIS SECTION REFERS
TO THE RED BRIGADES' COLD-BLOODED ASSASSINATION IN MAY 1999
OF LABOR MINISTRY ADVISER MASSIMO D'ANTONA. ANOTHER
PARAGRAPH REFERS TO THE JULY 2001 SHOOTING OF A DEMONSTRATOR
WHO WAS PART OF A MOB ATTACKING "AN ISOLATED JEEP WITH THREE
POLICE OFFICERS." WHY DOES THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CONSIDER THIS
LATTER INCIDENT TO BE ARBITRARY OR UNLAWFUL DEPRIVATION OF
LIFE?


7. (SBU) FOLLOW-UP Q: POLICE UNDER ATTACK IN PREVIOUS YEARS
HAVE ALSO FIRED ON AND KILLED THEIR ASSAILANTS. BUT SUCH
INSTANCES WERE NEVER MENTIONED IN THE HRR SECTION ON
"ARBITRARY OR UNLAWFUL DEPRIVATION OF LIFE." WHAT MAKES THIS
PARTICULAR CASE ARBITRARY AND UNLAWFUL?


8. (SBU) FOLLOW-UP Q: DOES THE USG CONSIDER EVERY DEATH BY
SHOOTING BY AN AMERICAN POLICEMAN TO BE POTENTIALLY UNLAWFUL
OR ARBITRARY?


DEADLINE
--------------

9. (U) PER REF A, THE HRR WILL BE PUBLICLY RELEASED AT
APPROXIMATELY 12:00 NOON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, I.E., 6:00
P.M. ROME TIME. WE WILL NEED RESPONSES TO THESE QUESTIONS
NLT WEDNESDAY MORNING (ROME TIME),FEBRUARY 27.

SEMBLER