Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02KUWAIT5293
2002-12-09 16:38:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kuwait
Cable title:  

(C) GULF WAR MISSING: PREPARING FOR UPCOMING TPC

Tags:  PREL KPOW IZ KU ICRC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUWAIT 005293 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR D, NEA/FO, NEA/ARP, NEA/NGA, IO/UNP
GENEVA FOR STONECIPHER
LONDON FOR GOLDRICH
PARIS FOR OFRIEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/09/2012
TAGS: PREL KPOW IZ KU ICRC
SUBJECT: (C) GULF WAR MISSING: PREPARING FOR UPCOMING TPC
MEETING

REF: KUWAIT 5262 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: AMBASSADOR RICHARD H. JONES; REASON 1.5 (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUWAIT 005293

SIPDIS

STATE FOR D, NEA/FO, NEA/ARP, NEA/NGA, IO/UNP
GENEVA FOR STONECIPHER
LONDON FOR GOLDRICH
PARIS FOR OFRIEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/09/2012
TAGS: PREL KPOW IZ KU ICRC
SUBJECT: (C) GULF WAR MISSING: PREPARING FOR UPCOMING TPC
MEETING

REF: KUWAIT 5262 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: AMBASSADOR RICHARD H. JONES; REASON 1.5 (D)


1. (U) This is a corrected version of KUWAIT 5292, adding
dropped text. Please disregard KUWAIT 5292 in favor of this
message.


2. Action Request: see paragraph 8.


3. (C) SUMMARY: ICRC seeks advance approval of draft
Minutes of the upcoming TPC meeting (date still TBD). We
seek Department's concurrence with recommended wording, and
guidance on pressing the Speicher case. END SUMMARY.


4. (C) Draft Minutes: ICRC has circulated to the coalition
allies (US, UK, France, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia) draft Minutes
of the upcoming extraordinary meeting of the Tripartite
Commission (TPC - see reftel). Its intent is to ensure that
there are no surprises in Geneva, by getting all parties to
agree in advance on the outcome of the meeting, and by
strictly limiting the agenda (for instance, prepared
statements are not/not anticipated). As soon as the allies
agree, ICRC will share the draft with Iraq. The draft text
is as follows:

BEGIN TEXT:

DRAFT
Minutes of the 24th Tripartite Commission Meeting
Geneva, xy December 2002


1. The Tripartite Commission met on xy December 2002. It
was attended by all its members.


2. The Tripartite Commission agreed to extend the mandate of
the Technical Sub-Committee until the next meeting of the
Tripartite Commission.


3. The Tripartite Commission formally endorsed the following:

To suspend the Technical Sub-Committee's quorum rule No 8 for
a period of four (4) months as permitted by rule No 16 in
order to allow meetings between Iraq and any other Tripartite
Commission member to address cases previously discussed in
the Tripartite Commission in the presence of a third
Tripartite Commission member mutually agreed between Iraq and
the other party.


4. The Tripartite Commission decided to hold its next
meeting in Geneva on xy April, 2003.

Republic of France Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Republic of Iraq United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Northern Ireland

State of Kuwait United States of America

END TEXT.


5. (C) Kuwaiti Addition: Kuwait wants to insert a fifth
point stipulating that the countries that would meet under
the new TSC dispensation would be Kuwait and Iraq, in the
presence of Saudi Arabia. Dr. Ibrahim al-Shaheen, Vice
Chairman of the National Committee for Missing and POW
Affairs (NCMPA),told the Ambassador December 9 that the GOK
is concerned that not specifying an agreed formulation for
the TSC during the TPC would throw the question into a round
of time-consuming bilateral discussions which Iraq would no
doubt seek to exploit for its benefit. In addition, putting
this in the TPC Minutes would make it doubly clear that the
Iraq-Kuwait-Saudi meetings came under the TPC umbrella. From
our perspective, however, if not worded carefully, the
Kuwaiti formulation might inadvertently preclude other
possible compositions of the TSC, such as US and Iraq in the
presence of Kuwait (or any other third TPC member acceptable
to Iraq). We have informed ICRC ad referendum that we can
live with the fifth point provided it is worded as follows:
"The initial meetings of the Technical Sub-Committee will be
limited to Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia." The key word
there is "initial," which preserves our equities.


6. (C) Background and Comment: The TPC, including its TSC,
constitutes the internationally-recognized apolitical forum
for direct discussion among the parties to the Gulf War of
issues related to POWs and missing persons. UNSCR 1284
specifically called on Iraq to resume cooperation with the
TPC. Iraq has boycotted the Commission for the last four
years, allegedly in protest at US and UK participation.
However, recently it has tried to tempt both Kuwait and the
US into addressing such issues bilaterally, i.e. outside the
TPC framework. Last spring, the Iraqis issued a patently
cynical invitation to the USG to come to Baghdad to discuss
the case of missing US Naval aviator Captain Michael Scott
Speicher. The USG did not take the bait. Now, it appears
that Iraq may be willing to re-engage - at least with some
TPC members - within the TPC framework. That was the intent
of the proposed rule suspension. Given Iraq's past
pronouncements, all expectations are that it will agree only
to meet with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, but the wording of the
proposed rule suspension was intentionally designed to leave
open the possibility of other TSC permutations, including a
US-Iraq-third country meeting on the Speicher case. At the
upcoming extraordinary meeting of the TPC, the US delegation
may want to propose such a session. If so, it will need to
be prepared for the unlikely event that Iraq might suddenly
profess readiness to engage in-depth on Speicher on the spot.



7. (C) Dates:


A. PolChief asked ICRC Regional Delegate Michel Meyer why,
according to the draft Minutes, the TPC meeting set for March
6-7 was being put off to April. Meyer explained that April
would allow a full four months to test the success of the
rule suspension, but he took the points that:

(i) it is not necessary for the TPC to wait the full four
months before deciding whether to extend the rule suspension,
and

(ii) if the next TPC meeting is not until April, it should be
earlier in the month, i.e. not quite four months from the
date of the rule suspension, to keep the suspension from
lapsing.


B. ICRC has still not proposed a specific date for the
upcoming extraordinary meeting, but we expect it to be in the
December 14-20 timeframe. We will advise USMission Geneva
immediately when we know the date, in order to secure hotel
accommodations. Regarding the spring 2003 TPC meeting, we
recommend holding onto the reservations made for March 6-7;
we will advise as soon as any new dates for that meeting are
confirmed.


8. (C) ACTION REQUESTED: Department, in consultation with
OSD/DPMO, is requested to advise as soon as possible (a)
whether the draft Minutes as per paragraphs 4 and 5 above are
acceptable to the USG; (b) whether we should push in Geneva
for a meeting with the Iraqis in the revised TSC context, and
how hard (also, should we flag this now in our comments on
the draft Minutes?); (c) if the Iraqis refuse to meet with
us, whether we should object to the proposed rule change; (d)
if the Iraqis are amenable and leave the choice to us, which
if any country we would prefer as the third party. We would
be most grateful for an answer to (a) by our oob Tuesday
December 10, as ICRC is keen to finalize the draft Minutes
and present them to Iraq.
JONES