Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02KATHMANDU1344
2002-07-10 11:33:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

NEPAL'S FY 03 BUDGET FOCUSES ON SECURITY, CUTS

Tags:  EFIN EAID ECON NP GON 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 001344 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR SA/INS
LONDON FOR POL - RIEDEL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN EAID ECON NP GON
SUBJECT: NEPAL'S FY 03 BUDGET FOCUSES ON SECURITY, CUTS
DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE

-------
SUMMARY
----------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 001344

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR SA/INS
LONDON FOR POL - RIEDEL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN EAID ECON NEPAL'>NP GON
SUBJECT: NEPAL'S FY 03 BUDGET FOCUSES ON SECURITY, CUTS
DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) On July 8 Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba
presented a budget that for the first time puts "maintaining
peace and security" in the face of the Maoist insurgency
ahead of poverty alleviation as an "overriding priority."
Introduced by royal ordinance in the absence of Parliament,
the FY 03 budget increases security-related expenditures by
43 percent while cutting development expenditures by 23
percent. The lean budget, which features the narrowest
margin of increased expenditures ever, comes in the context
of a dismal .8 percent growth in GDP. End summary.


--------------
BUDGET BY ORDINANCE
--------------


2. (U) On July 8 Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba presented
the USD 1.2 billion FY 03 budget to an assembly that included
dignitaries from the Government of NEPAL (GON),
representatives from the undissolved Upper House of
Parliament, and members of the diplomatic community at the
National Planning Commission. The PM prefaced his speech by
justifying both his decision to extend the state of emergency
and his move to dissolve the Lower House of Parliament. In
the absence of Parliament, the budget had been approved by
royal ordinance earlier the same day. NEPAL's fiscal year
begins July 17.


3. (U) The budget, presented in the shadow of the
six-year-old Maoist insurgency, an extended state of
emergency, a dissolved Lower House of Parliament, and
impending national elections, was remarkable for several
"firsts." Projected expenditures, for example, for the first
time declined (albeit by a modest 3 percent) in comparison to
the previous fiscal year. Another first: "maintaining peace
and security" displaced poverty alleviation as an "overriding
priority" for the first time. Thus requested levels for
regular expenditures (about USD 736.4 million),boosted by a
43 percent surge in defense spending, outstripped requests
for development expenditures (about USD 495.8 million). An
effort to aim at more realistic revenue estimates, based
primarily on improved tax and customs collection and
increases in import duties for certain goods, resulted in
projections 9 percent lower than the previous year. Revenues

are expected to account for about 58 percent of expenditures,
with foreign grants and loans making up an additional 15
percent and internal and external borrowing another 12.5
percent. A budget deficit that is 5.2 percent of GDP is
projected.

--------------
WHAT MADE THE CUT
--------------


4. (SBU) Since "development is not possible without peace,"
funding for the Ministries of Home and Defense together
accounted for the single largest percent (23.6 percent) of
regular expenditures. Regular expenditures in general will
be trimmed by an embargo on the procurement of new vehicles
(except for the security forces),contracting out of cleaning
and guard services for government offices, and the
elimination of redundant positions in the Public Service
Commission and in loss-making state-owned enterprises. The
PM ranked poverty alleviation and employment promotion next
after this "investment for peace" required by the security
forces. Electricity and road construction programs received
the most generous allotment of development expenditures at 18
and 10 percent respectively, while education, irrigation, and
health services netted 8.5 percent, 7.7 percent, and 7.1
percent respectively.


5. (SBU) Some of the development projects that escaped
elimination under the uncharacteristically austere budget
included improved credit programs for agricultural borrowers;
subsidized training programs for former Maoists;
micro-hydropower schemes to provide electricity to another
5,000 households; the repair of infrastructure damaged by the
insurgents; expanded Food for Work programs for former bonded
laborers; and agricultural extension programs for apiculture,
sericulture, and livestock raising for remote rural areas.
The budget provided funding in the amount of approximately
USD 7 million for national elections, now scheduled for
November 13. In an acknowledgement of widening unemployment
figures, the PM also announced the Government plans to send
100,000 young people abroad for foreign employment, with
priority given to "people from poor, downtrodden and ethnic
groups." Foreign investment will be promoted by offering
ten-year, multiple-entry visas to non-resident NEPALi
investors and by creating "a congenial atmosphere" for
investors of other nationalities. Funding to begin
construction of an Export Processing Zone in the border city
of Bhairawa is also set aside.
--------------
GRIM GROWTH FIGURES
--------------


6. (U) The budget presentation followed closely upon the
release of the annual Economic Survey, which reported a mere
.8 percent in GDP growth in FY 02, the smallest increase in
18 years. (Note: FY 01 GDP growth was 4.7 percent, while
6.14 percent growth was posted in FY 00. End note.)
Agricultural productivity grew by only 1.7 percent, compared
with 4.3 percent the previous year. Non-agricultural growth,
dragged down by the struggling tourism and garment
industries, meanwhile, grew by a minute .2 percent, compared
with 5 percent the previous year. Per capita income declined
from USD 240 to USD 226 during FY 02.


7. (SBU) The depressing performance of the current year
notwithstanding, the Government of NEPAL (GON) is nonetheless
predicting an optimistic aggregate economic growth rate of
4.3 percent during the upcoming fiscal year. Much of the
anticipated increase is predicated upon an inexplicably
projected 4.9 percent increase in the non-agricultural
sector.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


8. (SBU) So far the FY 03 budget has generated only muted
static from some quarters, including the Opposition Communist
Party of NEPAL - United Marxist Leninist (UML),both for its
slicing of the usual array of development programs and its
introduction despite the dissolution of Parliament. While
its estimates for next year's growth seem somewhat rosier
than warranted--especially since we see no immediate relief
in sight for the depressed garment and tourism
industries--the GON appears to have made a legitimate effort
to meet donor demands to pare expenditures and develop more
modest projections for revenues. In prior years the GON had
proved unable to spend all of the funds allocated for
development; the soaring costs of the insurgency have now
forced it to prioritize its spending. The scuttling of many
GON-funded development projects is an unfortunate, but
inescapable, casualty of the insurgency.
MALINOWSKI