Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02KATHMANDU1336
2002-07-10 03:33:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

PRESS FREEDOM UNDER NEPAL'S STATE OF EMERGENCY

Tags:  PHUM PGOV SOCI PTER NP 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 KATHMANDU 001336 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

LONDON FOR POL/RIEDEL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV SOCI PTER NP
SUBJECT: PRESS FREEDOM UNDER NEPAL'S STATE OF EMERGENCY

------
SUMMARY
-------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 KATHMANDU 001336

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

LONDON FOR POL/RIEDEL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV SOCI PTER NP
SUBJECT: PRESS FREEDOM UNDER NEPAL'S STATE OF EMERGENCY

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Since the beginning of the State of
Emergency in Nepal, 123 journalists have been arrested, with
35 still detained, three tortured, and one reportedly killed.
Inaccuracy and partisanship in the press have led to
government mistrust and restrictions on publications. Press
reaction has ranged from outrage at the questionable
circumstances of and motives for the arrests, to welcome
acceptance of government restrictions as a means of insuring
increased accuracy of reporting. Nepal's Maoists also
restrict the press, as they have threatened journalists with
death for writing certain kinds of articles. Currently, the
press is pushing for increased access to conflict areas and a
Freedom of Information Bill to help expand press freedoms in
Nepal. The Embassy will continue to press formore cooperative
military-press relations. End Summary.

--------------
ARREST OF JOURNALISTS
--------------


2. (U) As of June 26, 2002, the Informal Sector Service
Center (INSEC),a Nepali human rights NGO, reports that 123
Nepali journalists have been arrested under the Terrorist and
Destructive Activities Ordinance (TADO). Of these, 35 are
still in custody. (Note: INSEC provides the names and dates
of arrest and release for all these cases. End note.) Three
journalists, Shankar Khanal of Space Time Daily, Shyam
Shrestha of Mulyankan, and Bijay Raj Acharya of Srijanashil
Prakashan, have reported being tortured while in police
custody. The actual number of journalists tortured is rumored
to be higher. Recently, Jana Astha, a left-leaning newspaper
with a fairly good track record for accuracy, reported that a
Maoist journalist who was arrested in May, Krishna Sen, was
killed in custody. (Note: The government has not confirmed
reports of Sen's death. The Home Ministry says it has no
information on Sen's whereabouts; the Defense Ministry says
the same. Prime Minister Deuba told the press June 27 that
the government will disclose the facts regarding Mr. Sen's
wherabouts at the time of his death in "due time." The Prime
Minister assured the Ambassador privately on July 4 that his
government would initiate an inquiry. End note.)



3. (U) Of those arrested, most were uncharged and can only
speculate on what led to their detention. Under TADO anyone
suspected of terrorist activities may be held for 90 days
without charge, extendable by 90 more days with Home Ministry
permission. The reasons for arrest go beyond pro-Maoist
publications, which are clearly prohibited, and security
personnel admit to arresting journalists to pressure them
into revealing Maoist contacts and other information. The
Prime Minister is quoted as saying in a March 6 statement
that Gopal Budhatoka, editor of Sangher, was arrested for
"spreading rumors and demoralizing the army." Colleagues of
Mr. Budhatoki attribute his arrest to an article he published
about financial irregularities in helicopter purchases by the
Royal Nepal Army.

--------------
GOVERNMENT POSITION
--------------


4. (U) The Secretary at the Ministry of Information
reiterated in a private interview on June 3 that the
curtailment of rights under the emergency is not directed
against the press, but added that the press cannot publish
items that favor the Maoists or demoralize the military.
When asked to elaborate on what qualifies as demoralization,
he gave an example of a report that RNA personnel committed
human rights abuses or killed civilians, when reporters had
not been there to verify the information firsthand.

--------------
CREDIBILITY OF THE PRESS
--------------


5. (SBU) Nepal's press faces a credibility gap because of
their inaccuracy, history of leniancy in their criticism of
the Maoists, and political partisanship. A military source
said that the military feels reluctant to facilitate
information gathering by journalists because events are
frequently misreported. Journalists also report that before
the state of emergency, the press seemed to favor the
Maoists, raising concerns that increased press freedom and
access to conflict areas will lead to unbalanced criticism of
the military rather than of the Maoists. Many newspapers
also have strong political ties, creating questions about the
fairness of reporting. The government argues that
restrictions on the press are in the interest of preventing
the spread of untrue and potentially dangerous statements.
On the other side, the press argues that government oversight
reduces its credibility in the public eye, as journalists are
seen as government mouthpieces.

--------------
LEGAL CONCERNS
--------------


6. (U) Journalists and their families have raised concerns
about the legality of arrests and the "disappearance" of
arrested journalists. They have made multiple allegations of
violations of the law prohibiting the military from
participating in civilian arrests or interrogation. This is
a legally murky area, as TADO requires that the army hand
over civilians, but not combatants, to the police, and the
army claims it is arresting suspected Maoists, not
"civilians." There have also been complaints of raids of
press offices by both uniformed and plainclothes police
without warrants, though this is allowed under TADO. Finding
the location of arrested journalists is a major issue, as
security forces frequently do not disclose the location where
the arrested person is being held, and generally do not allow
visits by family members. There is also the problem of
determining whether an arrested journalist is being held by
the police or the army, as both frequently deny any knowledge
of the whereabouts of arrested persons. The right to file
writs of habeas corpus is still guaranteed, however, and many
colleagues and relatives of those arrested have been making
use of this right. The relatives of ten arrested journalists
filed such a writ earlier this year. After filing, the
family members report that they were harassed repeatedly by
security personnel. A writ of habeas corpus has also been
filed by the Nepal Press Institute for one of its members,
and the Supreme Court has ordered that he be found. To date,
these journalists have not been produced.


7. (SBU) The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has
been prominent in its attempts to gain access to information
about journalists who have been arrested, interrogated, or
detained. The NHRC works for accountability in the security
forces and tries to ensure that actions taken against
journalists stay within the legal provisions of the state of
emergency and TADO. This Commission has made inquiries and
requested notification within three days of the whereabouts
of arrested journalists. An official in the complaint
division reports, however, that it has experienced extreme
difficulties in its work as the government is very
uncooperative in responding to its inquiries. The "response
is always that they haven't arrested anybody." Despite these
difficulties, as a constitutional body the NHRC is the most
powerful force in Nepal in the monitoring of treatment of
journalists.

--------------
MAOISTS
--------------


8. (U) The Press is restricted by the Maoists as well.
There have been reports from all over the country that
newspapers have been warned against "collaborating with the
government" by printing articles on certain subjects. As of
now, however, only one serious incident has been reported.
Demling Lama, a correspondent of Radio Nepal, was abducted by
Maoists and held for 36 hours, because, he believes, of an
article that he wrote about their activities. While
torturing him, they told him that they were planning to kill
other journalists in the country. Mr. Lama managed to
escape, fearing for his life.

--------------
PRESS REACTION
--------------


9. (SBU) In conversation with five journalists, all stated
that self-censorship is practiced by everyone in the media in
the form of avoiding materials that may violate the 16
directives for the press (See para 12) or lead to
repercussions by law enforcement agencies. A member of INSEC
complained that the press does not publish reports of human
rights abuses because they are "totally self-censored."
Taranath Dahal of the Federation of Nepali Journalists stated
"we have become suspects," and described an atmosphere of
fear and demoralization created by the arrests and
intimidation of journalists around Nepal. The National Human
Rights Commission also reports a situation of intense fear.
An official at the Commission stated that he has received
from journalists many reports of torture by police, but "most
people request us not to report these because they are so
scared...those people could be arrested again tomorrow."
When asked if he thinks the press is afraid to print the full
news, he gave an example of an occasion near Nepalgunj where
members of the NHRC were led by journalists to four bodies,
presumably shot by the RNA. When the members asked the
journalists why they had not reported the incident, the
journalists responded that they were afraid of retribution
from the military.


10. (U) In contrast, Krishna Timilsina, Executive Director
of the Nepal Press Institute (NPI),stated that he believes
the censorship measures taken by the government are
necessary, explaining that "In this abnormal situation no one
can expect the freedoms guaranteed constitutionally...In war
we have to observe some special rules and regulations and
abide by the legal provisions." He also considered it a
matter of ethics not to criticise the military or the
monarchy, and supported the directive against publishing
articles that may be demoralizing to the military. He
explained that the NPI practices rigorous self-censorship,
and as a result has not experienced government interference.


11. (SBU) The political leanings of the press have been an
issue since the beginning of the state of emergency. In the
five years preceding the emergency, leading journalists say
that the majority of the press seemed to sympathize with the
Maoists to some extent. When the state of emergency was
declared, however, the publication of Maoist press releases
came to an immediate end and the press "surrendered" to
government directives. Media groups, they say, have been
eager to prove their patriotism by denouncing the Maoists and
practicing a self-censorship that in some cases goes beyond
the restrictions placed on them.

--------------
PRESS UNDER EMERGENCY
--------------


12. (U) Several Articles and Sections of the Nepali
Constitution were suspended by the State of Emergency imposed
on November 26, 2001 and the Terrorist and Destructive
Activities Ordinance (TADO). Two of these have direct
bearing on the press. These are Article 12.2, which
guarantees freedom of movement throughout the kingdom, and
Article 13, guaranteeing press and publication rights and
protection against censorship. Also suspended are Article 15
against preventive detention and Article 16 guaranteeing the
right to information. Two days after the declaration of
emergency, a set of 16 directives was issued to the press by
the Ministry of Information and Communication detailing what
information it considered fit to broadcast or publish. Among
the categories proscribed as not fit to publish are news
items hurting or shocking civilians, their faith, morality
and social norms; any item weakening multi-party democracy;
and any report insulting, humiliating, or shocking the army,
police, or civil servants. At the same time the press was
encouraged to publish the heroic deeds of the RNA as well as
verified news from the Ministry of Defense. The press has
largely followed these directives for a variety of reasons,
including patriotism and fear.

--------------
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
--------------


13. (U) Two current hot issues in the Nepali press freedom
debate both relate to access to information. The first is
the issue of media access to conflict areas and the right to
independent verification. At a seminar on June 5, a
representative of the RNA expressed the view that the
military is not interested in facilitating media access to
the field because security forces need to focus on their
primary objective of fighting the war, and could not
guarantee the safety of the journalists. He also reiterated
concern that the journalists would publish false information
that is damaging to the military. Journalists responded that
they were willing to accept the risk and burden of being in a
conflict zone, but they needed permission to travel to those
areas as well as increased military cooperation in providing
them with information to help ensure that they are able to
report accurately. Some progress was made on setting up a
meeting between media and military leaders to discuss this
issue further. The Embassy has encouraged greater involvement
of the press in conflict areas as a mutually beneficial
action, and the military has, on a few occasions, taken
members of the press to the field.


14. (U) The second high-profile issue regarding access to
information is a proposed Right to Information Bill, to take
effect after the State of Emergency. The right to
information is guaranteed in the presently suspended Article
16 of the Nepali Constitution, but the draft Bill defines who
will have this access, and specifies the kinds of information
included. Section 8 of the Bill requires the provision of
information regarding unlawful activities perpetrated by a
public official, and Section 14 defines the mechanism for
redress. The Bill was proposed jointly by the Nepal Press
Institute and the Federation of Nepali Journalists in 2001,
and the Secretary at the Ministry of Information announced
plans to introduce it in this year,s Parliamentary summer
session. With the dissolution of the Parliament,
consideration of the Bill has been postponed.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


15. COMMENT: Clearly, The Maoist insurrection and the
Government's counter-insurgency campaign have taken a serious
toll on press freedom in Nepal. Contributing to this problem
have been the low professionalism of elements of the press,
the expressed sympathy ofsome journalists for the Maoists
before the declaration of the state of emergency, and the
deeply ingrained habits of non-transparency of the RNA. The
Embassy has been working to encourage greater press freedom
in Nepal, arguing that the detention of journalists for the
purpose of intimidation is counterproductive in the fight
against Maoist terrorism and risks giving Nepal a bad human
rights reputation that could become an obstacle to continued
international assistance. The Ambassador plans to raise this
issue again with the Prime Minister during their next
meeting. US training now being planned for the RNA will
include discussion on more cooperative military-press
relations. End Comment.
MALINOWSKI