Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02ANKARA8564
2002-11-22 14:22:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

TURKISH BROADCASTING BOARD LIFTS SOME RESTRICTIONS

Tags:  PGOV PREL PHUM TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 008564 

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/03/2010
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: TURKISH BROADCASTING BOARD LIFTS SOME RESTRICTIONS
ON KURDISH BROADCASTS -- BUT EU UNDERWHELMED


REF: A. ANKARA 7290

B. ANKARA 8535

C. ANKARA 6904

D. ANKARA 6116


Classified by Acting Political Counselor Nicholas S. Kass.
Reasons: 1.5(b)(d).


C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 008564

SIPDIS


DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE


E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/03/2010
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM TU
SUBJECT: TURKISH BROADCASTING BOARD LIFTS SOME RESTRICTIONS
ON KURDISH BROADCASTS -- BUT EU UNDERWHELMED


REF: A. ANKARA 7290

B. ANKARA 8535

C. ANKARA 6904

D. ANKARA 6116


Classified by Acting Political Counselor Nicholas S. Kass.
Reasons: 1.5(b)(d).



1. (C) Summary: Turkey's High Radio and Television Board
(RTUK) enacts a regulation lifting some restrictions on TV
and radio broadcasts in Kurdish -- but only on state-owned
stations and under strict time limits. EU representatives in
Ankara said the limited regulation will not bolster Turkey's
EU bid. End Summary.



2. (U) The RTUK announced November 20 -- two days after the
new AK Government assumed power -- that it had implemented
regulations, pursuant to laws passed by the previous
Parliament, allowing broadcasts in Kurdish and other
non-Turkish languages traditionally used by Turkish citizens.
The regulation sets the following restrictions:


-- Non-Turkish broadcasts are permitted only on state-owned
media outlets.


-- TV broadcasts will be limited to 30 minutes per day, two
hours per week; radio broadcasts will be limited to 45
minutes per day, four hours per week.


-- Non-Turkish TV broadcasts must have Turkish subtitles, and
non-Turkish radio broadcasts must be followed by the same
program in Turkish.


-- Broadcasts aimed at teaching non-Turkish languages are
prohibited.



3. (C) The broadcasting measure completes the previous GOT's
efforts to adopt regulations implementing the August
EU-related legislative reform package (refs A,C,D). However,
Ankara-based EU and EU member state representatives are
criticizing the RTUK measure's restrictions -- as are local
human rights and pro Kurdish groups. They also predict that
what they describe as such half-hearted measures will not
bolster Turkey's EU candidacy.


-- Luigi Narbone, second in command at the EU office in
Ankara, told Poloff the GOT in the past had indicated to EU
officials it would adopt a more open approach to non-Turkish
broadcasting. He said the limited regulation could fuel EU
skepticism about GOT reforms.


-- A Danish diplomat also said he was disappointed with the
regulation, and expressed concern that publicity about the
restrictions could distract attention from positive
developments.


-- A British diplomat said the regulation's shortcomings
would not be a major factor in EU thinking, but would give
ammunition to Turkey's EU critics.


--------------
Euros Hoping AK Will Do Better
--------------



4. (C) Poloff urged the diplomats to view the RTUK measure as
an opening that can be exploited by a reform-minded
government -- noting that AK Party and government leaders are
signaling a desire to break new ground on human rights. The
diplomats agreed. Narbone noted that AK officials had
already told him they want to broaden the scope of
regulations on minority foundations (ref A),adding that he
hoped AK will take the same approach toward the broadcasting
regulation. (Note: Interior Minister Aksu issued a circular
Nov 21. encouraging strict protection of human rights -- ref

B. End note)


--------------
Comment
--------------



5. (C) The RTUK action is representative of the GOT's overall
reform efforts. It is at the same time both a groundbreaking
advance and a maddening example of stubborn resistance to
change -- particularly among Establishment Kemalists, who
regard "pro-Kurdish" reform as a direct assault on Turkey's
identity and on their own primacy in the current scheme of
things. Turkey has once again taken a step in the right
direction, but only a half step. The U.S. and EU must
continue to reward these efforts while pressing the new AK
Government to continue down the path toward permanent,
fundamental reform. AK's interest in changing the status quo
is a factor in favor of reform.
PEARSON