Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02AMMAN2251
2002-05-07 14:48:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

PROPOSED MIDDLE EAST CONFERENCE GREETED WITH

Tags:  PREL KPAL IS JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002251 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/06/2012
TAGS: PREL KPAL IS JO
SUBJECT: PROPOSED MIDDLE EAST CONFERENCE GREETED WITH
SKEPTICISM

Classified By: CDA GREGORY L. BERRY FOR REASON 1.5 (B) AND (D).

-------
SUMMARY
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 002251

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/06/2012
TAGS: PREL KPAL IS JO
SUBJECT: PROPOSED MIDDLE EAST CONFERENCE GREETED WITH
SKEPTICISM

Classified By: CDA GREGORY L. BERRY FOR REASON 1.5 (B) AND (D).

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (C) A survey of political contacts suggests a general lack
of enthusiasm over the recent Quartet proposal to stage a
Middle East conference in the next few weeks. The GOJ has
endorsed the proposal with some caveats. While several
contacts condemned outright the idea of a conference, a few
made tentative suggestions about its content. Most contacts
questioned the need for such a conference when there are a
number of previously agreed upon measures that have not been
implemented. Most contacts were also deeply skeptical about
Israeli intentions if such a conference takes place. End
Summary.

--------------
GOJ ENDORSES CONFERENCE PROPOSAL
--------------


2. (C) The GOJ has publicly reacted positively to the idea of
a conference, focusing on its content and its participants.
King Abdullah issued a public statement from Washington
saying that the conference should be based on relevant
international resolutions, President Bush's speech to the UN,
and the Saudi initiative. King Abdullah also stressed that
all parties should participate in the conference. Privately,
however, GOJ contacts have a number of questions about the
concept. Foreign Minister Muasher's personal assistant Ali
al-Ayed, told PolCouns that it is the substance of a
conference and its necessary outcome--creation of a
Palestinian state--that would likely govern the level of the
GOJ's support. Jordan, he said, would hope any conference
would not be "just another forum for expressing views," but
rather geared to concrete political accomplishments.

--------------
JORDANIANS SUSPICIOUS OF CONFERENCE'S PURPOSE
--------------


3. (C) Outside the government, some Jordanians welcomed the
call for a conference with qualifications. However, all were
concerned that the real purpose of the conference was to
change the rules of the peace process and annul Oslo,
Mitchell, and Tenet. East Banker and former Minister Nasir
Lawzi endorsed the conference if the purpose was to find a
way to implement Mitchell and Tenet. He urged the U.S. to
include Syria and Lebanon in the conference, so the entire
region would be onboard. He also cautioned that no such
conference could be held without Arafat, a condition echoed
by many contacts. Former Royal Court advisor Adnan Abu Odeh
favored the concept of a conference if it had the moral
authority to implement any results, but also thought the
conference would find little popular support in Jordan.


4. (C) Among less moderate Jordanians, the conference was
roundly criticized. One PolFSN contact reinforced the
widely-felt distrust of Israeli intentions towards peace
negotiations, "Israel has its own agenda--if it really wanted
peace, why did it not agree to the Saudi plan?" The same
source accused Israel of asking for this conference as a way
to delay and drag out the issues. Faleh Taweel, former
Jordanian Ambassador to Iraq and an advocate of most
anti-Israeli conspiracy theories, said that "if the
conference is going to be based on the Saudi initiative, it
will be accepted." Press coverage in Jordan was both
suspicious and skeptical of the conference, and more moderate
Palestinians appeared frustrated with the idea. "Why not
implement what we've already decided on?" One press contact
viewed the conference as likely to be insignificant if it is
held below the summit level. Almost all contacts agree that
Arafat, Syria, and Lebanon must be involved if the conference
is to have any legitimacy.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


5. (C) While the GOJ endorses the idea of a conference, many
Jordanians view the proposal as ineffective--or worse, as a
U.S.-backed Israeli plan to dismantle previous agreements and
to deflect popular anger. Our argument that a political
process is one necessary part of any progress is greeted with
deep skepticism. The Jordanians' comments reflect a growing
level of frustration with the drawn-out nature of the
political process, seen here as having gained little for
Palestinians over the past 9 years.

BERRY