Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02ABUJA3304
2002-12-12 15:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Abuja
Cable title:  

NIGERIAN TEXTILE BAN: "WE'RE DOING THIS FOR AGOA"

Tags:  ETRD BEXP KTEX ECON NI 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ABUJA 003304 

SIPDIS


STATE FOR EB/TPP AND AF/W
STATE PASS USTR FOR CMILLER AND PCOLEMAN
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC
GENEVA PASS USTR FOR TAGLIANI


E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/01/2012
TAGS: ETRD BEXP KTEX ECON NI
SUBJECT: NIGERIAN TEXTILE BAN: "WE'RE DOING THIS FOR AGOA"


REF: A. USDOC 6040

B. LAGOS 2034

C. ABUJA 1810


Classified by Ambassador Howard F. Jeter; Reasons 1.5 (b) and
(d).


Summary
-------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ABUJA 003304

SIPDIS


STATE FOR EB/TPP AND AF/W
STATE PASS USTR FOR CMILLER AND PCOLEMAN
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC
GENEVA PASS USTR FOR TAGLIANI


E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/01/2012
TAGS: ETRD BEXP KTEX ECON NI
SUBJECT: NIGERIAN TEXTILE BAN: "WE'RE DOING THIS FOR AGOA"


REF: A. USDOC 6040

B. LAGOS 2034

C. ABUJA 1810


Classified by Ambassador Howard F. Jeter; Reasons 1.5 (b) and
(d).


Summary
--------------

1. (U) Standing the spirit of free trade on its head, a
senior Nigerian Commerce Ministry official says the GON
temporarily banned imports of certain printed fabrics and now
imposes import restrictions on these items as part of the
country's efforts to qualify for AGOA trade benefits. The
Standards Organization of Nigeria will implement these new
regulations, which include testing for dangerous chemicals,
labeling, and enforcement of intellectual property rights. In
addition, the Nigeria Customs Administration will enforce
minimum values and shipping restrictions announced August
2002 (Ref. B). The Commerce official also claims the new
regulations are WTO consistent and that HS code 5210.600
exists at the international level.



2. (C) There is a much simpler, more plausible explanation
for the new trade regime in textiles: the protection of a
troubled domestic industry. Additionally, a poor
understanding of the international trading system among GON
trade policy experts and systemic corruption in the Customs
Service that makes tariff collection difficult explains why
protection for these textile manufacturers was granted in
this WTO-inconsistent fashion. End Summary.



3. (U) Ministry of Commerce Director for External Trade Y.F.
Agah met November 29 with Econoff to discuss the GON's import
ban and new registration system for textiles known as
"African prints." These textiles, usually brightly colored
and printed on both sides, are primarily used to make
traditional attire for both men and women. Agah--three months
ago promoted from Deputy Director for Multilateral Trade to
Director for External Trade--has been working on this issue
for the GON at the interagency level since 2000.


A New Import Licensing Regime
--------------

4. (U) Agah maintained that the ban on imports of African
prints was intended to regulate the textile trade by
eliminating illegal trans-shipments so that Nigeria could
qualify for AGOA textile benefits. He said the GON recognized

that Nigerian manufacturers could become competitive
exporters of African prints to the United States if AGOA
benefits were accorded. The first step was to gain
recognition of Nigerian African prints as folkloric articles,
something he claims AUSTR Rosa Whitaker agreed to at the
April 2002 TIFA held in Washington.



5. (U) The second step was to regulate imports of Asian-made
African prints into Nigeria, much of which had illegally
passed through Atlantic ports or across the Benin border. He
said that before the GON could establish a workable visa
system to prevent trans-shipment, it was necessary to first
establish an orderly, legal trading regime. Agah separately
mentioned legislation now pending in the National Assembly
for an AGOA-consistent textile visa system that would be the
next step in efforts to prevent trans-shipment.



6. (U) On August 27, the Ministry of Finance announced a ban
on imports of African prints effective on August 31. The ban
was intended to be temporary, pending establishment of new
import regulations for those textiles (Ref. B). Agah claimed
the system was now in place and the temporary ban was lifted
in October. Agah mentioned that in addition to the import
requirements in the August 27 notice--such as a minimum
import price, restriction of imports to Apapa and Tin Can
ports only, and incentive pay for customs agents--the GON had
established other import rules that would be implemented by
the Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON).



7. (U) First, the SON would certify harmful chemicals were
not used in manufacturing the fabric. Agah claimed many
foreign manufacturers used dangerous chemicals--chlorides and
sulfates--in printing the fabrics. According to Agah, these
chemicals often precipitate severe allergic skin reactions.
Second, the SON would verify that each bolt of fabric or
finished garment is accurately stamped to indicate the
country of origin and manufacturer. He asserted that many
imported fabrics were fraudulently stamped "Made in Nigeria,"
when in fact they were not. Frequently, the fabric would not
include any information at all on its origin. Third, the SON
would certify that the designs used in the African print were
original and not copied from other manufacturers.



8. (U) Agah could not provide additional information on the
process an importer would go through to get SON
certifications. Nor could he say whether any importers had
applied for SON certification or whether any African prints
had actually been imported under the new system. He said the
regime had only been in place for two months, and the SON had
probably not clearly defined these import procedures. He
suggested Econoff contact the SON, based in Lagos. (Note:
Lagos Econoff has been unable to contact a SON official who
is aware of these new certification requirements for imported
African prints. End Note.)


WTO Concerns
--------------

9. (U) Agah told Econoff that Article XVIII of the GATT
Agreement permits restrictions on imports of printed fabrics
as a safeguard measure to protect local industry from an
import surge. When asked how the GON determined there was a
damaging import surge, he answered that the markets were
being flooded with cheap printed fabrics from India and
China. At least four Indian companies were mass-producing for
the Nigerian market, Agah maintained. He said that the market
price for imported fabrics was 250 Naira (about $2),while
similar Nigerian fabrics sold for 850 to 1,000 Naira ($6.50
to $7.75). Agah acknowledged that no notification had been
made yet to the WTO on this justification for the new import
regime.



10. (U) Agah argued that Article XX also allowed for the
import restrictions based on public health concerns. As
mentioned above, Agah claimed that many imported African
prints are made using harmful chemicals. He said that it was
consistent with the WTO framework that the GON be allowed to
regulate this trade.



11. (U) On the issue of national treatment, Agah stated that
domestic manufacturers of African prints already
"scrupulously" followed the regulations the SON would now
enforce for imported fabrics. He indicated that the SON
regularly visited textile manufacturers to ensure compliance.
Therefore, there was no reason to also restrict the sale of
local textiles.


Customs Implementation
--------------

12. (U) Agah explained that the Bureau of Customs would not
only enforce a minimum import price but also a minimum volume
per 20-foot container. The Ministry of Finance had not yet
determined the import price to be applied, he said. The
minimum quantity, however, would be 6,000 meters of fabric
per container. Such a minimum was necessary because,
according to Agah, all too often importers had claimed to
bring in half-full containers when in fact the container was
full to the brim. He indicated that physical inspection of
each and every container was not practical, and therefore a
minimum volume and price is necessary to prevent
under-invoicing.



13. (U) Agah said that the import regime would be applied
only for goods declared under the Harmonized System heading
of 5210.6000, which he claims exists at the international
level. He indicated the heading was established to ensure
that only African fabrics, and not other printed or dyed
fabrics, would be affected by the new import regime.



14. (U) Agah claims that the WTO Agreement on Customs
Valuation has not yet been implemented in Nigeria, and
therefore establishing a minimum import price was not
contrary to WTO rules. He believes that in the wake of the
lack of progress at the 2000 WTO Ministerial in Seattle, many
developing countries, including Nigeria, were granted a de
facto temporary exemption from implementing a customs
valuation system based on transaction values. In the long
run, he said the GON is planning to implement transaction
value and move away from its current pre-shipment inspection
regime that is based on reference values, but he was unable
to provide a timeline for this changeover. (Note: The
Comptroller of Customs for the Lagos Zone told Econoff in
Lagos that he has no knowledge of the lifting of the ban or
any standards to be implemented by the Customs Service.)


Comment
--------------

15. (C) Contrary to Agah's claim, Nigeria's efforts to become
a textile exporter under AGOA was not the sole reason for the
ban on African prints and the new import regime. It likely
was not even the primary reason. A more significant factor
was the GON attempt to protect the domestic market for
domestic textile manufacturers, who include wealthy,
politically connected businessman such as Aliko Dangote. For
quite some time, local manufacturers have been vociferously
complaining about being unfairly squeezed by Indian
competitors. We have seen similar trade measures imposed on
goods such as used automobiles and frozen chickens. In those
cases, the GON similarly claimed it wanted to stop smuggling
or protect consumer health.



16. (C) Embassy and Washington-based officials have
previously briefed Agah on the requirements of an
AGOA-consistent textile visa system. The GON should be aware
that such a system is based on record-keeping by producers to
prevent trans-shipments, not on import restrictions. Agah
seemed genuinely surprised that we would find GON textile
trade restrictions, ostensibly implemented for the sake of
AGOA, an unwelcome development. This episode shows that GON
officials have a relatively shallow understanding of
international trading rules. (Agah, although wrong on many
points, is truly one of the GON's most senior trade experts.)



17. (C) Another reason the GON is employing WTO-inconsistent
non-tariff barriers to protect domestic industry is that
tariffs are extremely difficult to administer in Nigeria.
Smuggling--facilitated by corrupt customs officials--is
rampant, and any tariff enacted to protect domestic industry
is easily circumvented and therefore does not satisfy local
manufacturers. GON officials apparently believe they can
better control trade through non-tariff barriers. End Comment.
JETER