Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
02ABUJA1218
2002-04-18 16:40:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Abuja
Cable title:  

NIGERIA: RESPONSE TO UN RESOLUTION ON CUBA

Tags:  PREL PHUM NI UNHRC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001218 

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR AF/W AND IO


E.O. 12958: 18/04/02
TAGS: PREL PHUM NI UNHRC
SUBJECT: NIGERIA: RESPONSE TO UN RESOLUTION ON CUBA


REF: A.) ABUJA 1164 B.) STATE 64509 C.) STATE 65639


CLASSIFIED BY CDA ANDREWS FOR REASON 1.5(D)


C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001218

SIPDIS


DEPT FOR AF/W AND IO


E.O. 12958: 18/04/02
TAGS: PREL PHUM NI UNHRC
SUBJECT: NIGERIA: RESPONSE TO UN RESOLUTION ON CUBA


REF: A.) ABUJA 1164 B.) STATE 64509 C.) STATE 65639


CLASSIFIED BY CDA ANDREWS FOR REASON 1.5(D)



1. (C) MFA Permanent Secretary Hart was surprisingly
open to the possibility of a Nigerian abstention after
hearing our points April 17. Hart agreed that the
language was mild, saying, "Cuba should have nothing
to fear" from it." He said that he would discuss the
resolution with Foreign Minister Lamido when he
returned from Dakar. Hart also planned to contact
Nigeria's Ambassador in Geneva.



2. (C) Hart was particularly interested in the degree
of support the resolution had within GRULAC. Embassy
April 18 sent him a second copy of the resolution,
with co-sponsors appended, under cover of a Note
requesting Nigeria to vote "yes" on Friday.



3. (C) Hart told us afternoon of April 18 that
Nigeria's Ambassador in Geneva had not returned his
telephone call from mid-morning. The original
instructions had been to vote in line with Nigerian
practice (i.e., against the resolution),but there had
been a discussion with Lamido and others following our
demarche (para one) and receipt of our Note. It had
been agreed that the Uruguayan draft offered an
approach to Cuba new enough that further study was
merited. Hart said someone from his office was
enroute to Geneva and that he would speak with that
officer evening of April 18 if Nigeria's Ambassador
did not return his call in the interim. The
Ambassador, said Hart, had been asked to consult with
the Kenyan, Senegalese and Sierra Leonean delegations,
as well as to report on Latin sentiment.



4. (C) COMMENT: Nigeria's Ambassador is Geneva was
provided instructions based on the GON's experience
with past Cuba resolutions. We do not know whether he
is playing a useful or negative role. The knowledge
that he has not returned Hart's call leaves us ill at
ease, notwithstanding Hart's comment that the
Ambassador is doubtless very busy with his leading
role in the African Group. Clearly, there is at least
some thought in Abuja of abstaining, but Nigeria's
Ambassador -- perhaps having staked out a position in
the African Group that he does not want to give up --
appears not to be engaging in that dialogue with his
capital. We have no objection to USDEL informing
Nigeria's Ambassador that Embassy Abuja has held
fruitful discussions with very senior levels of the
GON and encouraging him to call home. We would
strongly encourage USDEL to motivate supportive
members of GRULAC to approach the Nigerian delegation
and urge Nigeria to take the lead within the African
Group and vote "yes." We have intimated in our
conversations, but not stated directly, that the
Latins are doing on Cuba what Africa should be doing
through NePAD and that the wishes of the responsible
regional group deserve respect.


ANDREWS