Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
01ABUJA1921
2001-08-02 10:00:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Abuja
Cable title:  

NIGERIA: OBASANJO IS READY TO WORK WITH U.S. ON

Tags:  PHUM PREL NI WCAR 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001921 

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/31/2011
TAGS: PHUM PREL NI WCAR
SUBJECT: NIGERIA: OBASANJO IS READY TO WORK WITH U.S. ON
WCAR


REF: (A) STATE 130883 (B) ABUJA 966 (C) ABUJA 1156


Classified by Ambassador Howard F. Jeter for reasons 1.5 (b)
and (d).


C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001921

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/31/2011
TAGS: PHUM PREL NI WCAR
SUBJECT: NIGERIA: OBASANJO IS READY TO WORK WITH U.S. ON
WCAR


REF: (A) STATE 130883 (B) ABUJA 966 (C) ABUJA 1156


Classified by Ambassador Howard F. Jeter for reasons 1.5 (b)
and (d).



1. (C) Per Ref A request, Ambassador met with President
Olusegun Obasanjo on July 31 to discuss the WCAR. Other
issues raised were Nigeria's role in Zimbabwe and post-JEPC
bilateral engagement, both covered in septels. This cable
reports on the WCAR discussion.



2. Ambassador Jeter expressed the USG desire to work with
Nigeria and emphasized the importance of using Geneva for a
constructive dialogue on WCAR. The Ambassador stressed that
together we can use this opportunity to lead the
international community to confront the scourge of racism.
However, he explained, the USG could not participate in WCAR
unless there is agreement to remove unacceptable language
involving reparations for the slave trade and comparisons
between Zionism and racism.



3. (C) President Obasanjo agreed that all forms of
discrimination must be condemned and that Zionism cannot be
equated with racism. The President emphatically asserted
that he would oppose the demand for reparations at the Geneva
meeting, calling the concept "complete nonsense." He then
described the possible involvement of his own great, great
grandfather in assisting slave traders. Pointing to
Ambassador Jeter, an African American, he asked rhetorically,
&who should be compensated, my great, great grandfather who
helped to perpetuate the slave trade, or your great, great,
grandfather who was a victim of it.8 Obasanjo argued that
reparations to African countries whose forefathers helped to
perpetrate these acts is simply "not right". He rhetorically
asked how we could expect reparations when even today the
slave trade continues in Africa. &Don,t worry. That will
not happen,8 he said.



4. (C) Ambassador Jeter noted that the President's position
was radically different from that of his representatives in
Geneva and in the Foreign Ministry. The President replied
that the Nigerian Permanent Representatives in New York and
Geneva "did not know my mind before, but now they do." He
went on to explain that he had briefed Ambassador Mbanefo at
the UN Mission in New York on Nigeria,s position. Asking
his Ambassador in Geneva to stand-down, the President had
ordered Mbanefo to attend the Geneva meeting to present GON
views.



5. (C) Comment. President Obasanjo's position came as a
complete surprise. Embassy demarches on this issue thus far
have been politely but firmly rebuffed, particularly at the
Second United Nations Unit of the MFA (see Refs B and C).
While inclusion of language concerning Zionism and racism
usually appears less important to Foreign Ministry personnel,
they uniformly assert the need for WCAR discussion of
reparations and apologies for colonial-era transatlantic
slave trading. They become visibly uncomfortable when asked
about ongoing trafficking in persons. The most senior
official demarched prior to the President offered only that
Nigeria could be flexible on the form (increased aid, debt
forgiveness, etc.) that "reparations" might take. Our next
interaction with our WCAR interlocutors at MFA should be
enlightening.



6. (C) Comment continued: Obasanjo's new position on the WCAR
is just one more example of foreign policy making at the
highest levels of the GON. This is not the first time
Obasanjo has turned a policy on its head, leaving us to
wonder whether Obasanjo's views have filtered through the
bureaucracy. End Comment.
Jeter